[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Jesus Crucified.jpg (128 KB, 986x1200)
128 KB
128 KB JPG
It's insane how much people hate this great man simply because he fought against slavery, colonialism, and apartheid.
>>
>>18361861
It's insane how much Jews hate him 2000 years later just cause he told them that, and I quote
>You ain't shit
>>
If Christ is resurrected, then he didn't save anyone. Hell, in Mel Gibson's new film, he'll prove it by saying that God must personally descend into hell and only then will you be saved.
>>
>>18361907
Christ was a Christian.
We ARE Israel.
You can go ahead and call me goy kadosh, goy (Jews are goyim are like you btw).
>>
>>18361907
>He didn't.

>The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.
Luke 4:18-19
>>
Jesus gay
>>
>>18361911
I like this guy
>>
>>18361861
He didn't exist and he never fought against slavery, colonialism, or apartheid.
The narrative literally says that slaves are to obey their masters. It also says that all knees will bend and people will say that he is lord, which is colonialism. The narrative said that he's only there for the Lost Sheep of Israel, and called a foreign female a dog, setup for apartheid.
>>
File: History of Biblical Canon.png (1.34 MB, 1080x1691)
1.34 MB
1.34 MB PNG
>>18361907
>>18361911
Jews were for a while the last remnant of "official" continuity Israel. But, because Juba II reinstated John the baptist as the high priest of the defunct church of Osiris,- the jews who killed the Baptist clearly didn't give a shit about honoring the name of Israel in its original intent and meaning;
The hebrew branch of Osirianism.
Judea rejected Johannes by killing him, so Jesus as his successor decided to rebuild Israel, starting with the Galatians whom descended from coastal english-channel Celts that fled from Romes expansion, triggering germanic counter expansion into the galatian homeland.
Juba II's family had been near friends with Bithynia forever, which is why he noticed the druidic megalithic background of the arriving celts, and that they and coastal germanics were fellow suncow-worshippers like Osiris himself and the agrarian part of the berbers.
Israel = Hebrew followers of Osiris of Elohim.
Christianity = Israels heir seeking out the believers of The Aesir of Alvheim.
Because they share EEF + Megalithic European beliefs.
>>
If he was real I'd hate him for being a disgusting jew.
>>
>>18362108
Nigger, that's not talking about the abolishment of slavery, that's talking about Jesus fulfilling something from the prophet Isaiah. Do you retards even understand what you're reading? Jesus is literally saying that he's fulfilling that prophecy by the people in Nazareth hearing him speak those words. They still kept doing slavery.

Us getting into the fact that Jesus didn't fulfil it, or that it's misquoted, is a completely separate topic, because Isaiah is talking about freeing the Hebrews from Babylon. Not the abolishment of slavery.
>>
File: beck.jpg (375 KB, 1400x1080)
375 KB
375 KB JPG
I communicate with God but nobody believes me, they call me a nutcase. This is why I don’t feel threatened by anything or anyone, and I’m carefree.
>>
>>18362076
>He didn't exist
Why do you midwits keep spouting this nonsense? Like its one thing to not believe His message. But to claim there was no such thing as an historical Jesus? It only makes you look really ignorant. Virtually every historian worth his salt agrees Jesus did exist as a person, regardless of how you feel about His message.
>>
kek
>>
Jesus was a proto-communist
>>
>>18362441
From a scientific point of view, Jesus is a Jew, and Christian fascists don't need such a Jesus.
>>
>>18361861
The Messiah is supposed to come and turn the whole world into Jerusalem's colony. Yet he will shower them with goodness and joy after all the wicked are gone.
>>
>>18362441
Nope, you're suffering from religious delusions, seek professional help

All gods are mythologies
All holy books are fictional
Politics is Treachery
Religion is Brainwashing
>>
>>18362650
>>18362680
>moving the goalposts
I expected nothing less
>>
File: 1754742757331852.png (1.73 MB, 1024x1536)
1.73 MB
1.73 MB PNG
>>18361861
he fought for God, and by realizing God in himself he could show others how to do it. Isa's message is about non-duality. Isa and God are one, like you and God are one. the difference is that Isa knows that and you don't
>>
>>18363268
I'm not reading your garbage. bye
>>
>>18361861
But why do I have to believe, cant it just happen irl?
>>
>>18362441
We can go over the 2 historians that you'll bring up.
>Josephus
>Tacitus
And I can show you how they're not actually original to the document, but later Christian tamperings.
Then we can go over all the people who either don't actually reference Jesus, and just talk about Christians or Jews, and how that's not actually evidence either.
Then you'll ragequit and never reply, because you'll have turned up the valve on the Hyper Copium bottle, and will be unable to respond.
Which would you like to start with?
Josephus?
Tacitus?
>>
File: 1744263915960.jpg (1.99 MB, 2580x2764)
1.99 MB
1.99 MB JPG
>>18361919
NTA but this is and has always been a widespread belief among all Christians except for boomer Evangelicals and some other weirdos in the recent past
>>
>>18363750
I am aware of the Josephus tampering, he most likely said something neutral about Jesus, but then the editing added language that borderline makes him look like a christian. But then there are still other multiple factors that when compounded make it so that the more likely explanation that a man named Jesus really did walk the earth 2000 years ago. I find this explanation more plausible through Occam's razor than any other explanation given, and this is the current concensus held by most historians, if anything claiming Jesus never existed is a fringe view. I am curious about how do you explain the rapid movement if Jesus Himself never existed? What do you make of that?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.