For much of humanity it was pretty much medieval, let me explainyou go back to the 1500s and it was some guy in armor with sword and shield....you go back 1000 years to 500 AD and its some guy with armor, sword and shield....you go back to 1000 years to 500 BC and its some guy with armor and shield...like its all pretty much the same shit. Why is that? Its only recently we got guns and shit
>>18362603European Favstian SOVL created the gun, the ocean going ship, the violin, the printing press, all instruments of distance from which the entire modern world was created. Favstian man's destiny is on the horizon which is why He came to dominate the world.
Because she abandoned paganism in favor of Christianity
>>18362603You don't seriously try to compare a 1400 Plate armor with a 1200 Chainmail armor and even a lorica segmentata from the High Roman Empire. Not to mention, the progress in architecture, agriculture, weapons (European swords didn't even commonly have crossguards because the entire defense was relegated to a big, unwieldy shield), metallurgy, shipbuilsing, the fucking printing press and much more.Might as well compare a Mark IV tank from WW1 with a Tiger I tank and a M1 Abrahams and say that military technology and tactics didn't progress for an entire century. History didn't start with guns, European Industrialisation wouldn't have been possible without the advancements from the medieval period.
>>18362615created by gun, perished by black penis. universe is a funny guy
>>18362603>50000 BC>some guy launching a projectile>2026 AD>some guy launching a projectileYet there's clearly a distinction in how sophisticated the method of projectile launching has become. In the same sense the full plate armor used by a 14th century knight is more sophisticated than the armor used by his 5th century counterpart or a Roman or Macedonian soldier.
Let me remind you that the chances of inventing an airplane in 4000 BC were higher than in the Middle Ages.
>>18362709duude those roman spartans were basicalyl knights lmao they all had steel armor and swords theres legit no difference except on how society worked
>>18362739They wore armor of bronze, leather or linen and didn't even cover their full body. Spartan armor would've been a joke compared to pic related.
>>18362751dude its the exact same shit lmao
>>18362752At a quick glance you can tell that armor is exposed at at least 10 different locations, the quality of the metal is massively inferior, it does not have flexible joints, neither does it have stirrups or pointed tips for horseriding. You're completely retarded so good job at getting 2 replies from me.
>>18362758>bro my guy covered in metal is different trust menigga its the exact same shit what difference is social context
