[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I'm reading this book written in 2001 and its incredible how far ahead of its time it was. No one in the mainstream was talking about white birth rates, anti-white propaganda, or a complete immigration moratorium. The republican party was focused on spineless and weak polices. If post cold war republican presidents started an isolationist foreign policy, and fought back against progressive advances in the culture war, then the right would have won by now.

Why was this brand of conservatism kept on the sidelines in the republican party before 2024?
>>
File: 1992.png (150 KB, 1066x803)
150 KB
150 KB PNG
This was in 1992
>>
>>18362995
Another win for the Amerimutts they were talking about the Great Replacement 10 years before the French fags who now take credits for awakening the White Race like how the farting Fuhrer and his pink swastika nazi fags took credits for the Amerimutts eugenics and race theories.
>>
>>18363030
>Blows Bill Clinton or a horse
>Makes America Gay Again
GOD bless America
>>
>>18362995

>No one in the mainstream was talking about white birth rates, anti-white propaganda, or a complete immigration moratorium.

And who exactly in the mainstream today is talking about this?
>>
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/529143269



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.