Why has cultural subversion been extremely successful in anti-socialist liberal democracies compared to socialist states?
>>18379372I don't know but Assassin's Creed should have stopped with the first game and Halo should have stopped with 3.
>>18379372Private ownership of media and non-profit activist groupsLarge number of extremely wealthy people willing to mindlessly put money into obscure non-profits which then direct the money towards political lobbying of media companies and patronizing of political activist artists Also, pic related. The Americans used the above-mentioned infrastructure to psyop themselves before the Soviets got the chance
Also the USSR was very anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist post-Stalin, which helped a lot
>>18379372Because liberal democracies developed their economies and most people could afford to consoom slop and become degenerates while socialist states remained poor and their lower classes generally remained trad.>anti-socialistThey are not anti-socialist. You can be a socialist in the west and no one will give a shit, whereas if you are a fascist or white supremacist you will be ostracized and sometimes charged with a hate crime. I don't know why you would say something so stupid unless you like to pretend socialists are underdogs or something.Socialists are ideologically TRANS, in the sense they are in denial of reality, whether it be the denial of the flaws of socialism or the denial they are not real women. Go on /leftypol/ and lay down some very low level criticism of the trans movement like the nature of "gender dysphoria" and whether it is really something innate and they will all defend it, they will all accuse you of being a "concern troll" or somesuch.
>>18379372>TQA2+???
