P1: If God exists in the actual world, he exists in all possible worlds.P2: It is not the case that God exists in all possible worlds.C: God does not exist in the actual world.
P1: if God exists in any possible worlds, He exists in all possible worldsP2: God exists in a possible worldC: God exists
>>18380486>world with no time>only three spatial dimensions >perfect sphere within them>no godDescribe a logical contradiction entitled in this world.
>>18380493>world *exists*>no GodThis is the contradiction.
>>18380498>heh, I presuppose itConcession accepted.
>>18380499Who are you quoting?
>>18380504(You). You need to presuppose God in order to claim that the world contains a contradiction because I does not contain the presupposed God.
>>18380509I would argue you need to presuppose God in order to know anything at all, however the proof of the contradiction is here >>18380486If there are any possible worlds in which God exists, then those worlds are contingent on God to exist. But if the world is contingent on God in any possible world, it follows that it is contingent on God in all of them. Therefore, God must exist.
>>18380519>If there are any possible worlds in which God exists, then those worlds are contingent on God to exist. But if the world is contingent on God in any possible world, it follows that it is contingent on God in all of them. Therefore, God must exist.But given that there is a possible world where God does not exist, there are no possible worlds where God exists. Thanks for playing!
>>18380523There is no possible world in which God does not exist, proven here >>18380486
>>18380493>Describe a logical contradiction entitled in this world."no god"
>>18380524There is no possible world in which God exists, proven here >>18380467.
>>18380527P2 is proven false, proven here >>18380486I accept your concession
>>18380526See >>18380499.
>>18380530P2 is proven wrong, proven here >>18380467.I did not concede, you are lying. That's a sin. You care more about looking cool on an anonymous imageboard than about avoiding sin!
>>18380537>heh, I presuppose itConcession accepted.
>>18380538I did not presuppose it. My argument for supporting premise 2 is to propose a world without God and with no apparent contradictions. Your only argument against this supporting argument was to presuppose God!No wonder a Christian who cares more about looking cool on 4chan than about avoiding sin is this bad at defending Christianity.
>>18380543Nope, wrong.
>>18380551>I yield! I yield!Heh.
>>18380555I didn’t yield, you yielded. I winJesus won
>>18380557Nope, I was the last person itt to present an argument. You just went nuh-uh.Btw I'm farming sin from you by making you lie in ways that you likely will not repent for. Keep it up!
