If you were starting a government from scratch after a revolution do you believe in hard coding reforms in a constitution or should the constitution be as plain and simple and barebones as possible to just set the structure and then reform by statute
>>18387445What's funnier is that people somehow think you can just start governing from scratch. Good luck overthrowing a system and NOT keeping its old administrative regulations and legal code. You change it through a sequence of spaced out reforms or you risk a collapse in government altogether.
No one under 110 IQ gets to vote
>>18387709>votelmao
>>18387445Doesn’t matter because any constitution is/should be amendable.
>>18387445I would stablish moral commandments and legal punishments to be unchanging and unreformable then let the entire economy up to public debate
>>18387964I would unironically write into the constitution that the state can swap at any time from full on communism to capitalism through elections and dictate a seven year period where all private property is redistributed, all legal records and debts are anulled, every previous politician is sacrificed (including me) and new ones are elected. The one year period of chaos would allow society and its strata to be in an eternal state of mobility. One man would spend 7 years homeless and the other 7 in charge of a mega corporation
>>18387445Nothing. just pure anarchy.
>>18387445The constitution should serve to limit government power as much as possible.
>>18387445As long as corruption and lying in government is punished severely than everything else falls into place from there.
>>18387445Monarchy is the only system that works thoughever. They need enough authority to squash corruption and be accountable to no one. Separated powers are a breeding ground for corruption.Anything that's written on paper will be twisted, diluted, distorted for the agendas of the merchant class.
