[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


...and not a single Female Genius has appeared.

When are historians going to accept the fact they are simply not capable of Genius?
>>
File: madonna.jpg (69 KB, 736x721)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>>18389927
Yeah, about that.
>>
>>18389933
A Female can be exceptionally gifted, or talented, or even have an element of greatness (not quite as much as a male) in a field like music, but she can never be 'Genius'.
>>
>>18389927
Ayn Rand is pretty up there for me. Her philosophy isn't for everyone but her mind is definitely exceptional.
>>
>>18389944
If you decide from the outset you can't then you won't find any. That's how confirmation bias works



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.