if women are so oppressed why do they never form armed militias to actually kill all men?
It's easier and more likely to work to just gatekeep chuddies out of getting laid.
>>18400541They did Check-out the shemaidens and Sarmatians
>>18400549no it isn't lol, that has only caused misoginy to skyrocketyou lose if you don't kill your enemy
>>18400541Like abortion centers?
>>18400554neither of those were female-only societies
>>18400541Because women are biologically equal to men and make up roughly half the population meaning a man-woman civil war would have about a 50% chance of victory for either side.It definitely wouldn't be a total slamdunk for the men
>>18400577through history, men have rebelled against oppressors even knowing they would lose because they would rather die than be slaves, why don't women do the same?
>>18400541Because it's easier to manipulate men into fighting for them.
>>184005921. Women are so vastly unmatched that that they know they'd never win2. Women don't genuinely feel that their quality of life is that much worse than it otherwise could beMix of these
>>18400599*outmatched
>>18400592Because they expect men to do all the fighting
>>18400599>Women are so vastly unmatched that that they know they'd never winwhy haven't they prepared? they're absolutely unprepared for any sort of conflict>Women don't genuinely feel that their quality of life is that much worse than it otherwise could bethis is true, al least firstie white womenand the reason why I'm posing this thought "exercise" is that for all the radical feminist discourse online, there seems to be a complete disconnect with a fundamental reality of existing which is deadly conflict, I obviously know that the reason why is because women have been historically shielded from conflict since that task was delegated to men in every society, but honestly their complete lack of preparation or even awareness for real deadly conflict makes me lose all respect for so called radical feminist women
>>18400549Sounds like somebody's projecting...
>>18400610There is one.
>>18400627>a single meme manifesto and an individual assasination attempt over a personal feudso a nothingburgerwhere's the recruitment networks? the funding? the production of weapons? the organizing? the ideological consensus?women need to get better at conflict if they want their rights to be respected
>>18400541because when push comes to shove, a lot of women aren't that oppressed, take american women for example, they live better than the vast majority of thirdie men and they benefit from white men and capitalism every single day, why would they risk their lives in an armed gender conflict?also much of the feminist discourse online nowadays is actually just straight up hedonism, women repeating nonstop how they won't have children and just enjoy capitalism until they die, which will ironically condemn future generations of women to what seems to be a regression in their rights if current trends continue, zero planning for the future, zero awareness of social dynamics outside a simple-minded first world feminist dichotomy, etc, just an individualistic selfish mindsetSimply existing will inevitably lead to conflict because everyone has different interests, sometimes these conflicts are intergenerational and if you don't fight back, you will eventually lose, modern women not having children is a cowardly opt out and they will be remembered as the generation that selfishly fucked women over
>>18400541Because they just want to whine and they expect that the whining will be enough to get things handed to them. They're basically spoiled children.
>>18400549>Sorry, Mr. Chudmeyer, but your contract has been terminated. We need to make room for all the random bullshit jobs we need to create to make female labor seem important. Oh, and your wife just left you. Trust me, I know. I fucked her last night. She's also pregnant with triplets, so better take a loan. No hard feelings though, right?
>>18400541Patriarchy has never existed. It's literal blood libel for men. Women are the gender who gender police and uphold gender norms. Mothers teach norms to their sons and girlfriends shame men for not living up to gender norms. The worst atrocities against women (FGM, Footbinding, being homebound, not working, etc..) where promoted/advocated by women. And we can see this to a lesser extent with the internal gender hierarchies of women when it comes to looks and makeup. Society is Anti-Male as Males experience explicit legal and social discrimination (today and throughout history). Saying otherwise is just pathological narcissistic projection.
>>18400541Some Greek sailors recounted meeting Amazonian tribes who frequently maimed all males and kept them as slaves.>> Some tell a story how the Amazonian women dislocate the joints of their male children while mere infants, some at the knee, and others at the hip-joint, that they may be maimed, and that the male sex may not conspire against the female, and that they use them as artisans to perform any sedentary work, such as that of a shoemaker or brazier. Whether these things be true or not I do not know, but this I know,
>>18401225literal bronze age fairytales with no archeological evidence
>>18401242Sources
>>18400541I unironically won't respect women until they form organized paramilitary groups en masse. Until then, as far I'm concerned they don't even believe they have it that bad.
>>18400541No balls, simple as.
>>18401277OP here, that's exactly my mindset, the patriarchy is described as the absolute most evil oppressive system ever in the history of humanity, if the system is so incredibly oppressive, it's literally illogical to not rebel violently because life is not worth living under it, yet there's never been actual organized armed resistance against it, the most violent feminist resistance was probably from the 20th century english suffraggettes and they were extremely non-violent, women lack leadership and conviction
>>18401315Suffragettes achieved their goals. When looking critically at feminist movements you cannot say that, in their case, non-violence wasn't successful. You could argue what were the true motivations were behind extending the franchise, but to suggest that violent feminine-identity partisans would have done better is baseless.
>>18400541Feminism is a psyop pushed by commies who want to destroy the family unit.
>>18401429>X is Y psyop pushed by Z to do A I've seen these arguments before
>>18401432What are you trying to say?
>>18401398>but to suggest that violent feminine-identity partisans would have done better is baseless.Like I said, the patriarchy is the most evil oppressive system ever according to them and all men are misogynists so the fact that there are no violent feminist movements means that A. They're exaggerating, B. They're cowards or C. A combination of both
>>184005411: They weren't and aren't oppressed2: Have you ever seen modern women try to organize something by themselves? They'd be splitting into armed cliques and shooting each other en-masse before any actual work was done.>>18400554>ShieldmaidensAhistorical Norse musclemommie fantasy, and a complete cope. There's literally better historical evidence for the (obviously mythological) claim that angels flew over Constantine's army after he converted to Christianity.>SarmatiansA few noblewomen dressed up in military cosplay for burial doesn't mean anything.
>>18400577>Because women are biologically equal to menSo why are the Olympics and most athletic competitions sex segregated?
>>18401747Don't forget chess.
>>18401501He's saying your worldview is pre-digested retardation
>>18400541BBecause they are weaker than men and know they'd lose attempting to do so. Besides it's really tiresomeand it's much easier to shit up teh Internet with their bosh.
>>18400541Look the reason women don’t ever fight is because of their survival instincts. Look at every conquest throughout history the women of the defeated tribe know that their pussies have inherent value to the conqueror so they spread their legs to the guys who just slaughtered their male relatives hoping the top brass find her sexy enough to take as a concubine which in their minds is much better than dying.
Women are too kind to opress men.
>>18403512Most women, at least. There will always be exceptions. The Dahomey Amazons, Joan of Arc, etc. Some women are more masculine than others, the same way most men are willing to fight and die for their country, but some are cowards.
>>18403529>kindmore like complacent, women clearly hate men specially nowadays but they don't actually do anything because violent conflict is too much of hassle to them even as a collective
>>18403616>The Dahomey AmazonsSlavers who got absolutely roflstomped the first time they fought actual soldiers.>Joan of ArcLiterally just a cheerleader in knight cosplay, also burned at the stake by the people she was 'fighting' for the moment she became politically inconvenient. Most likely also a literal schizophrenic.Do you want to do the rest of the usual 'impressive women throughout history' list? Because it's getting kind of boring how people like you who accept that list seem to know absolutely nothing about the women they idolise while also being absolutely allergic to context and nuance.
>>18403529That and we can just end their rule in a single day if we wanted to
>>18403980Joan of arc was hot though
>this entire threadyou don't have to justify some persecution complex if you have a distaste for womenthat's just called being gay/bisexualthe sooner you accept it, the sooner you'll find happiness, see you on the other sideo7
Low test
>>18400549They've been doing that for millions of years with no material difference
>>18400554Reminder that ancient/prehistorical matriarchies never existed.
Careful anon you're asking dangerous questions now.If you want a woman to freak out, ask her thisHow come in every single civilization, in every corner of the world, at any time during the history of civilizations, has the women been either ensalved or subservient to the man despite being 50% of the population.The real answer is not the fact that women are physically weaker than men, but becuse they are simply less prone to violence than men. Men are programmed for violence while women rather subject themselves than exposing themselves to danger, and thats why they have always been enslaved by men everywhere in the world despite having the exact same numbers. Just like everything else in this worlds; those who cannot bring themselves to violence will always be subservient to those who can
>>18400577>women are biologically equal to men
>>18405387It's actually because women can give birth to kids, therefore anything a woman does is less valuable than her giving birth.
>>18404980Dilate
>>18405324>never existed for long (outside of ridiculously specific and unusual situations)FTFY. There's one matriarchal society in the remoter parts of western China that was just too far away from anybody else to ever have any competition, so it survived. It's now a tourist attraction where large numbers of Chinese nationals pay for tickets to look at how incredibly primitive and barbaric the people are.
>>18400541They did. The women's right's movement was very ugly.
