What happened?
Please tell me exactly what you find hypocritical about this image? That the dictatorship of the proletariat can't have a place for people to shop for clothing?
>>18400848Gucci is a brand that sells tacky overpriced garbage to women who want to pretend their husbands are rich. The profit margin is insane, making the business extremely exploitative in marxist terms(a lot of alienates labour) while less exploitative alternatives exist.
>>18400848Why is the strong proletariat allowing itself to be exploited by international capitalists?
>>18400804The Chinese are too high iq to believe socialism works
>>18400901Chinese collectivism is already enough, they never needed socialism. Just a strong benevolent state
>>18400901Communism, socialism, marxism are empty words to the Chinese, they mean whatever they want them to mean and what the Chinese want is high-functioning ethno-nationalism.
>>18400901And yet they fall for the "socialism with Chinese characteristics" meme.
Why? Because the fundamental difference is that they have to play by the Chinese government's rules. China unironically understands that communism isn't something that can be achieved immediately or even quickly. But they're still slowly drifting towards command economics, centralized government, social programs. Gucci is allowed to do business with China because in order to access its market ot needs to follow China's rules, even political like recognizing Chinese Taipei instead of Taiwan. And you already known what China does its own billionaires.
>>18400901Chang please, dont you have some work to do for your hive? Stop wasting time talking nonsense.
>>18400804they lambasted and killed the oppressors in picture 1, leading to the chinese people being able to afford gucci in picture 2. problem? socialism works
>>18400804
>>18401508>Because the fundamental difference is that they have to play by the Chinese government's rules.the only thing they really have to do is give all their data to the government. other than that they don't care. the concept of IP doesn't exist in china. in that sense they are even more capitalist than the west. if you can get the capital together and have the right connections your business can succeed very easily in china.
>>18401502Nobody falls for that, not even the government.
>>18400804Deng realised starving to death wasn't necessary anymore since fat retard Mao had died.
>>18401977The recent Chinese tech crackdown shows that the Chinese government can and will completely topple high ranking company positions and influence for criticizing the government. Whether or not you agree with them is besides the point, but China is "more capitalist than the west" is a very stupid thing to say
>>18402272Go easy on him, A lot of Americans have spent their whole lives being indoctrinated with the lie that "Communism is when the government does something, and the more it does the more communist it is", which means they have no real mental framework to understand what's happening whenever the Capitalist class uses the state to support its interests.
