>& HumanitiesWhy should criminals have human rights?
>>18402825Eye to eye, etc. Trump should be rape in blackies jail for his crimes
>>18402829>americans literally have dungeons full of black rapists where they throw White men who misbehave>both right-wingers and left-wingers support this policyFundamentally unserious country
>>18402825Denying criminals human rights immediately makes any notion of an unbiased justice system a moot point and turns you into a dictatorship. Then you have to wonder what will become classified as a crime next, and what they're gonna do to you for that time you jaywalked or pirated a movie.
>>18402840This is the case in literally every system. In Germany they arrest people for Holocaust revisionism.
>>18402840You're not a criminal until your guilt is proven and offences that are at best only punished with a fine do not count.
>>18402825because they are still human
>>18402863>because they are still humanthis thinking is fundamentally incorrect, you can still have a human body but you can also not be a human, looking like a human=/=being a human, there is a standard, meet it, you degen, i will not elaborate further
>>18402869>i will not elaborate furtheryou won't because you can't. you're child-brained and are upset that people you don't like get the same rights you do
>>18402848Elon hates it, which means it's probably a morally good action beneficial to humanity at large.
>>18402825yeah i'm sure it's working out well for russia right now where posting on the internet "i dont want to die in ukraine" will get you sent to prison where you'll be raped and killed
>>18402825Because "crime" is a nebulous thing that changes depending on the current power enforcing things.Sure, a serial murderer or rapist that is doing it for fun should lose rights, but a homeless person arrested for stealing goyslop from a convenience store has already lost their human rights long before they got caught.
>>18402930>>18402825Aren't most of the criminals he arrested like legit murderers?We aren't talking about lesser crimes here.
>>18402935I am only speaking in general, but "murder" can be nebulous too. A crime of passion (husband killing a cheating wife when caught in the act) is bad but would that individual commit that same act against a random person for no reason? I wouldn't define them in the same category as a Dahmer, etc.
Many may think that criminals shouldn't have human rights, although when we talk about criminals in general, they have different classifications and reasons for commiting their crimes. Yes, one person might have commited murder for pleasure, while another have done so, for example, a mother who saw her daughter die in front of her and then she kills the murder, even if this is a very specific example, that's when a moral dilemma might arise: does she deserve to be treated with respect because she's a criminal? Both of them shpuldn't have rights? I think asking the question "why should criminals have human rights? and answering "they shouldn't" is classifying all criminals as the same and not taking into account their reasons and the seriousness of their crimes, that's a fallacy of generalization. For example, a poor person steals because of hunger, but at the same time, the poor person might steal because of the politician, whose also a criminal. Do you understand? Both of them shouldn't have rights? Although I don't agree with criminals because I obviously belive there are depraved people in this world I think we should think a little more about the issue, instead of generalizing. In the case of politicians, it's quite disappointing, because if you know the path to the "power" (in most countries), you'll know that even with good intentions, the "path" won't allow you; (and there's also people who didn't even have good intentions at the beigining). nobody gets to the postulation completely clean, and this is no way justifiable, nor should we have compassion by saying "they did difficult things" I don't even know how politicians sleep in peace. But we can't say "they did bad things they shouldn't have human rights" because honestly, that's not how the world works, even if it is unfair, that's how it will stay.
>>18402825Because you might support them. You love this guy
>>18402825Because human rights are inherent.
>>18402848Germany won't arrest you for just asking questions or speaking in good faith. They only prosecute people who are trying to rehabilitate the image of Nazism
>>18402825Not everyone the police arrests is guilty, and them having no recourse whatsoever makes it nearly impossible to prove they are innocent. You can see this with Mr. Bukkang's state of exception. 10% of those detained were innocent, by his own admission (God knows what the real number is).>>18402935Well no, they were gang members, which is co-morbid with being a murderer but not identical to it.
>>18402935No. That's mathematically impossible.
>>18402990They actually could be alot more strict in that.Picrelated is Der Dritte Weg who officially only hail the Strasserists, but literally everyone knows that they go further than that behind closed doors, yet they're still allowed to operate.
I like how you faggots keep pointing fingers to other parties and countries for thousands of years as if the next Freemason is magically going to be the good guy. News flash. The second coming is already here and no one knows his name.
>>18403021Because thats a literal honeypot
>>18403021Holy based
>>18403047What do you mean? They linguistically entrap you?
>>18402863and?
>>18403074No, he means that German law enforcement controls them to attract, entrap, and control neo-fascists.They actually do things like this fairly often.
>>18402825Just a little time ago, a woman in my country was arrested for saying men are not women.No, I don't want that to be a way to lose your rights.
>>18403219idiot. i was clearly being facetious.
>>18402825>>18402869I accused you of a crime OP. Because you have no rights there is no trail and you are sent to rape jail for 100 years
>>18402825I think the optic is wrong, you shouldn't think about crime and vengeance, instead about how you fix the issue.Terminally.
>>18403399Nobody wants to take away rights from people who have only been flimsily accused of commiting a crime.
>>18403410Yes they do, power tripping authorities violate people’s rights all the time. A good percentage of the police would openly steal from you if they could get away with it
>>18403410Except Mr. Nayib Bukkele, who has already done so.
Because the overwhelming majority of criminals usually have a lot of context that pattern like clockwork.In Sweden the overwhelming majority of male criminals have some sort of diagnose. The overwhelming majority have been abusing drugs and alcohol, especially as the crime was committed. A lot of criminals were recruited in an early age, dropped out of school and doesnt know any better, and they are more tempted to fall back into crime than becoming an ordinary citizen after serving their time because they have to start from 0 and become a loser and work a low pay job versus coming back to their organization and now have respect and status from serving time.An overwhelming majority of these guys also have personality disorders like being extremely impulsive and low patience and low concentration ability (again, some sort of diagnose). They also suffer from extremely poor self-esteem.For the women there is also an extremely obvious pattern in every criminal, and that is that the overwhelming majoirty of female criminals has suffered sexual assault and other sexual traumas, or also been recruited at an early age.If we take away their human rights because "they are not human" then what is human? All of the flaws I just listed are very human and we have to accept the human flaw in a democratic state. Society is systematically flawed.Also, there has been multiple research on the topic of harsh punishment = Less crime. The results has told us it's bullshit. Crime isnt influenced by level of punishment, it's influenced by the percieved possibility of getting away with it./used to work as a correction officer
>>18402825I just don't think anyone should be raped by nogs in prison because they got caught shoplifting and said nogs thought they were an easy target, no matter how much malicious normies convince themselves that 'it only happens to the (actually) bad ones'
>>18403428He will and has released suspects if their innocence has been proven, and those people still often love him, believing that losing a couple of months of freedom is worth it to end the rampage of the gangs.
>>18403442I kinda find funny only literal commiejews and browns seethe about him. Fun fact, he considers Hamas just another terrorist gang.
>>18402829>>18403435Do Americans only think about rape? In prison, criminals should be forced to do hard labor and be punished both physically and psychologically—for example, by being deprived of sleep for more than 48 hours or having all their teeth pulled out one by one. There are many more examples, but in general, prisons in El Salvador, Brazil, Russia, Central Asia, China, and the Middle East are much more “creative” and know how to instill fear in criminals. If fear and terror are not instilled in gangs and drug traffickers, crime will never disappear.
>>18403442According to himself, anyway. The mere fact ten percent of his detainees have proven to wrongfully imprisoned already shows the issue here.
>>18403433Harsher punishments do not prevent first time offenders from appearing, sure, that premise I accept, but how does keeping repeat offenders locked up not prevent them from repeating their crimes?
>>18402838Just dont go to jail. The dungeons are really for niggers to be slaves
>>18402838Except white prisoners mostly run that shit even when they are a minority.
>>18403456If Brazil is an example, it doesn't seem to be doing much. Their prisons are notorious but they still have a crime problem. Their homicide rate is something like 20/100k. Physical and especially psychological torture and abuse is also pretty common in many US facilities.
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/531556134
