Is cultural relevancy just a proxy for population size? Eastern Europe, for what was only got relevant once they got big clusters like Moscow or Krakow for example, and Italy ruled because they had big cities.
>>18403090The fuck is that map even supposed to be?
>>18403090Slavic micro-State lovers will hate this map. They (especially Balkanics) don't even want to admit they speak similar languages.
>>18403090take this nonsense to >>>/bant/, thanks
>>18403090First, that map is bullshitSecond, Cracow wasn't really even the biggest city in Austrian Galicia. That title would go to Lemberg. During PLC times Danzig/Gdansk was much bigger and more important.
>>18403839We are talking about culture, not shekels per goyim
>>18403090enter!
>>18403090Why is Dagestan considered Russian?
>Muh cultureEverything should be Italian then.France and Spain are Roman. The Balkans too.Greece is Roman.Anatolia.Everything is Roman.
Everything should be Jewish desu
>>18403090>Is cultural relevancy just a proxy for population size?Cultural relevancy is a result of having creative people, who can create interesting and compelling art. Population size is irrelevant - China is a cultural vacuum, because they don't seem to carry any genes for invention. Western Europe on the other hand has plenty of people with hyperphantasia (look it up), who have the imagination to visualize and conceptualize vast worlds, and then put them onto paper/marble/canvas/film reel, etc.
>>18405402For the same reason why Azerbaijan isn't Iranian. Because it's just shitty map with "pretty" borders.
