Why did Germans get along with his plans?All he promised them was never-ending war and hard work for some vague glory in the far future.How is that appealing to a normal person?
>>18403592>Why did Germans get along with his plans?They didn't, Nazi Germany was full of resistance groups and the top brass were plotting to assassinate Hitler before the war was even over
>>18403592Violence and group-loyalty is human nature. Why do you deny your humanity?
>>18403662I'm not a monkey.
>>18403592>Vengeance for the Versailles treaty>Destruction of communismTwo good reasons right there
>>18403592The Nazi party never had majority support. They hijacked the German Reichstag through brute force. The Germans never wanted another war.
>>18403724Men like war and women like men who like war. What's there not to get?
>>18403592>promise to eliminate jewry in europe>spends the entire war not deporting or even killing a single jewhow did germans fall for this? are they retarded?
>>18403741>listening blindly to what women wantPretty cucked desu
>>18403592Weimar was falling apart and it was either him or Communism.>>18403740Hitler was popular between '33 and '39 though. He did the FDR trick of spamming tons of public works to give people something to do.
>>18403786>Hitler was popular between '33 and '39 thoughThere's no way to know as the German democracy was virtually extinguished by then. In the last free election of '32, the NSDAP were far from the desired majority.
>>18403592>All he promised them was never-ending war and hard work for some vague glory in the far futurethis is completely untrue. Your perception of their goals and promises obviously is entirely based on Jewish propaganda that portrays Hitler as some sort of cartoonish super villain.The only point in the NSDAP's 25-point plan that the average person may have assumed to necessitate war was the call for the re-establishment of colonies. But even on that point, the historical context is that the German colonial empire had started by German merchants buying up land overseas, against the wishes of Bismarck and without war. Most of what Germany did acquire through war was acquired in just one year, 1884.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program
>>18403793The rest of the party program was focused on - saving Germans from the Jewish-led Bolsheviks who were murdering tens of millions of eastern Europeans at the time and had already succeeded in establishing a mass-murderous dictatorship in Bavaria (see Churchill's article "Zionism versus Bolshevism" on this topic as well as https://web.archive.org/web/20190917061611/https://thepurityspiral.com/the-jews-behind-the-bavarian-soviet-republic-of-1919/ - PREVENTING unnecessary wars by confiscating the profits of war profiteers- a more just economic system by outlawing usury, making companies share their profits with their workers and establishing access to higher education for poor people, and taking various measures to support an economically independent middle class - Stengthening the German family such as giving interest-free loans to newly-wed couples and creating affordable housing with and vegetable gardeAnd unlike anti-Nazi propagandists claim, they made considerable progress on many of these points. On the usury issue for example, they reformed the German central bank, which after WW1 was established by the Allies as a privately owned entity lending out money to the German state and paying out the interest as huge dividends to the foreign bankers who owned the bank, effectively robbing the German nation by way of the currency Germans were forced to use.Hitler kicked all non-German members off the Reichsbank's board as early as 1933, and completely nationalized it in 1938, thus ending the scam. I read all the original German laws and decrees on this issue, but info on this topic is hard to even get a hold of in English. See the chapter on the Reichsbank in "A History of Central Banking" by Stephen Mitford Goodson and https://odysee.com/@machainevrai:6/Comprendre-Hitler-et-l%E2%80%99usure-avec-Rabbi-Yaron-Reuven-(traduction-E-R).:5
>>18403794>giving interest-free loans to newly-wed couples and creating affordable housing with and vegetable gardethe loans were forgiven after the birth of two children, which was one of the reason the birthrate shot up massively under Hitler.The vegetable gardens (look up Schreber gardens) continue to be treasured possessions of many German working and middle class people to this day. Many of the remaining legal protections of German workers are also still holdovers from the National Socialist era, among them the legal requirement to provide at least a 30 minute lunch break on a work day and various provisions for tax-free bonuses. Not that modern Germans would ever express any gratitude towards the Nazis for these things, of course.
>>18403791There is a way to know just as there is a way to know today of leadership approvals in undemocratic countries. Historical consensus is that Hitler was popular, with a slight dip in the war years.
>>18403592Because the alternative was paying humiliating reparations to war victors, and people respond positively to nationalist and totalitarian aesthetics because it makes them feel epic and powerful. Even Bolsheviks used those vibes because it helps to mobilize people >>18403593These resistance groups didn't really do much and some of them actually joined the Nazishttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beefsteak_NaziThe assassination attempts came when Germany started losing the war
>>18403592>a normal personyour desire to do nothing but consume slop is the exception in historical terms, not the norm.
>>18403861>alternative was paying humiliating reparations to war victorsAllies completly canceled german reparations in 1932, year before Hitler
>>18403794>saving Germans from the Jewish-led BolsheviksBut they made a military alliance with Jewish-led Bolsheviks, holded joint military parades together, were sending them shitload of weapon technologies and machines in 1939-1941 and apparently would be OK with this until USSR was about to invade them
>>18403592>All he promised them was never-ending warexcept he didn't do that. I'm not aware of a single speech in which he openly advocated for war. Everything from the attack on Poland onwards was framed as a defensive action. They knew that war was unpopular (Goebbels writes so in his diary) and that the german people only supported the revision of the Versailles treaty if it didn't involve direct war
>>18403791>There's no way to know as the German democracy was virtually extinguished by thenit's like the Jim Crow South. major voter suppression to keep the Democrat Party in power.
>>18403819>>18403819what happens was children as young as 13 were encouraged to fuck and get knocked up to make as many babies as possible, shit was degenerate as fuck
>>18404180>he didn't do that.he did that to German generals, that's why he betrayed socialist in 1934 that the generals hated
>>18403592Because the Memelland was illegally occupied by Fascists and the rest of East Prussia was threatened as such. It's like asking why Ukrainians get along with Zelensky.
>>18403786>it was either him or CommunismYeah so why not communism? Unironic question.
>>18404261A communist Germany at the time would’ve lost its sovereignty to the USSR, it would inevitably become a Soviet puppet state. Not to mention communism would’ve made Germany even more poor than it already was and wealthy Germans were not keen on communists seizing power for obvious reasons.
>>18404261Because it's a repugnant atheist vanguard.
>>18403733>Vengeance for the Versailles treatyThat treaty wasnt even THAT harsh.>>18403740This as well, they never managed to gather a majority through fair elections.
>>18403740>>18404986NSDAP and BNVP held 42% of the Reichstag before it was set on fire. Meanwhile the Bolsheviks held a mere 24% of the Russian Assembly before seizing power.
>>18403823No there isnt.You're taken in by propaganda videos just like neonazies to believe NSDAP support was universal, which is bullshit.The other anon is correct, in the last free election the socialist parties got more than NSDAP.And war has a tendency to make people fall in line, in fact it's a common strategy for dictators to start wars in order to quell domestic division. Theres endless research that has been done on this social psychology.
>>18405017>universal supportNo one says there was universal support, just that Hitler was popular>The other anon is correct, in the last free election the socialist parties got more than NSDAPNSDAP was the biggest party in the Reichstag. It's disingenuous to claim that all SPD seats were socialist but even if they were, NSDAP + DNVP still had more than the Communists + SPD.
>>18405021DNVP were basically the party of the traditional elites, the junkers, prussian landowners, who were nostalgic for the 1870 Kaiserreich and wanted to restore Wilhelm as the absolute monarch. The nazies were kinda seething about them since they hated aristocracy but since both were nationalists they cooperated but in almost everything else they were polar opposite because the nazies were a revolutionary egalitarian (albeit racial) working class partySPD and KPD had far more in common since both were socialists through and through. It's still significant that both of these made up of almost 40% of the entire German voting population, so claiming that Germany was homogeneous in the slightest is ridiculous. The state apparatus was built on trying to present it as such tho.>No one says there was universal support, just that Hitler was popularPopular among his supporters yes, but behind the camera people were living under oppression. Kim Jong Un is also popular in front of the cameras and his popularity seems universal at a glance. Do you think this is the case?
>>18405029>the party of monarchists don't count but every SPD voter was a socialistlol. >Popular among his supporters yes, but behind the camera people were living under oppression. Kim Jong Un is also popular in front of the cameras and his popularity seems universal at a glance. Do you think this is the case?Well yeah, 'popular' is when you have a lot of supporters. As said here >>18403786 Hitler focused on short-term economic recovery of Germany(with a lot public programs and spending) which is a cheat code for short-term popularity, yes even in dictatorships.
>>18403592Hegel grindset. Conflict to accelerate. Result? Modern Israel and nuclear politics as next steps
>>18404261They only like communism if it's racist. Which is basically what national socialism is.
>>18405146Also the fact that Hitler was a nationalist, and socialists/communists are strictly against that. They want allegience to your class not your nation. Communism literally wants to absolish everything altogehter.So basically these people were traitors to Germany since they did not have a 'do-or'die' attitude to Germany.Otherwise yes, National-Socialism is basically socialism based on race rather than class, and being a nationalist. Hitler did a few pragmatic tweaks once he became head of state just to solidify support from the aristocracy, such as allowing private property, but NS in its core was against that. They were batshit crazy socialists fixated on racial purity.
>>18405370only communists, socialists in Weimar were super nationalistic (like every other party)
>>18404267>A communist Germany at the time would’ve lost its sovereignty to the USSR,no it would not what absolute dilusion, if anything it would be the other way around a communist germany would likely take command of the global communist movement.you a literal example of this with China not playing ball with the soviet union and doing its own thing.>Not to mention communism would’ve made Germany even more poor than it already was and wealthy Germans were not keen on communists seizing power for obvious reasons.too bad for them? They were the ones always benifiting from german down falls. The massive loans given and then forgiven by the former entant powers only benifited the wealthy upper class of germany will the people still lined up for billion marks bread.The ussr was the only state that not only avoied the 1929 depression but actualy grew its economy exponationaly. If a shithole backwater country that was still industrializing could do it , the very industrial germany would blow that out of the water.
>>18403794>>18403794>formed the German central bank, which after WW1 was established by the Allies as a privately owned entity lending out money to the German statepol niggers trying to go 5 secconds without lying is like a only fans slut trying to not suck cock.the Reichsbank was the exact same institution since 1876, not only that but it was always a private enterprise, until hitler sized it, and was also publicly traded. The allies or da jooos or whatever you retards try to peddle had nothing to do with its founding or it being a private institution.>effectively robbing the German nation by way of the currency Germans were forced to use.nice of you to leave out the detail that germany very intentionaly tanked its own currency as a way to get 2/3s of its war debt forgiven. Not only that but they also got acess to massive low interest loans. Yet 90 years latter retarded faggots cry about usury when germany got the most lenient treatment possible after ww1>thus ending the scamkekw. And then turning around and doing the most jewish thing possible, taking out massive loads that he never paid or infact intented to pay.
>>18403750>>18403724>pretending to not understandepitome of liberal debate tactics.>erm akshually im right wingyou are a either a liberal or a slavic racial nationalist.
