They're more often stereotyped as literal cavemen than the more primitive people's of Africa. They independently developed agriculture and iron metallurgy, "civilized" most of SSA via the Bantu, and even those mud huts everyone hates were only universal amongst poors and remained popular because they were simple, easy, and worked quite well. Technologically speaking, I think they can really only be harshly criticized for their lack of nautical ability (Homo Erectus unironically might've been superior to them in that area, but I'm not knowledgeable enough about that particular subject to say so with certainty).
>>18403611We wuz Ironmen
>>18403617>We wuz IronmenBut they weren't. Blacks, Asians, Hispanics, even whites, have all piggy-backed off of the Arabs in terms of technology and politics.
high contrast to whites in the americas and more primitive peoples like abos are more scarce
>>18403622>arabsthose dancing boy fuckers haven't been relevant for millennia now
>>18403622then why does metallurgy in west africa predate any of it neighbours? Did a persian just spawn their one day with a completely unique technique?
>>18403611Racism is just an extension of basic tribalism. And most people aren't self-aware or honest enough to go "yeah I don't like them cause they're not part of my community" so they make up stuff about how [insert outsider group] are objectively inferior subhumans or whatever. And the more different the outsiders look, and the more different their culture, the easier it is to dehumanize them.
>Homo ErectusFictional characters
>>18403629neither are blacks except for being performing monkeys for white people
>>18403632Metallurgy technology was imported from North Africa to West Africa.
>>18403712blacks are relevant for having the most attractive women of all races on earth…
>>18403713Their methods are quite distinct from those elsewhere...
>>18403718Based, but unfortunately most disagree.>>18403712You make it sound like they're just jesters when people all over the world wish to imitate them.
>>18403718Black women are attractive but paradoxically it's partly racism and historical/cultural baggage and power relations that make them hot.If you were a black tribesman you'd find them less attractive than if you were a white explorer in Africa
>>18403622Hispanics are europeans and whites (from spain).
>>18403713It was not the process is too different they don't even use water and based on archeological evidence West Africans worked iron before the rest of the world was working with bronze.
>>18403712they have bigger cultural and historical influence than Southeast Asians for example there is 450 mln Indonesians and Filipinos but if you asked average French, Argentinian or Russian they would be absolutely unable to name onenow West Africans and its diaspora and you have Kobe Bryant, Michael Jackson, maybe Nhkrumah or Sankara just off the top of the head
>>18403611>They independently developed agriculture and iron metallurgyAnd kept up in those areas with the rest of the world for centuries. Despite the fact that most of the region didn't use plough agricultural productivity was higher than in places like West Asia and North Africa, a British official operating in Gold Coast in the mid 19th century reported yields approaching the vicinity of 40 bushel per acre.West African blacksmiths were skilled enough to fix defective firearms replace entire parts and even making them from scratch coastal states preferred buying due to it being more cost effective from their perspective whereas in the more interior parts (Hausa states, Bornu) they were locally manufactured.>those mud huts everyone hatesThe type of dwelling people lived varied greatly depending on your class, whether you lived in a urban or rural area and region, Asante elites for example lived in big 2 floor houses with indoor plumbing system.
>>18403894Hurrrduur what is a Bruno Mars, Enrique Iglesias, and Olivia Rodrigo?You = Pea brain.
>>18403945>SAAAR WE WUZ LATINX N SHIIEET
>>18403841If I was an explorer in Africa none of that racism or historical/cultural context or power relations would exist in my experience
>>18404102What?
>>18403611They got enslaved by everybody
>>18404140Explorers in Africa were interacting with indigenous tribals, if anyone held power it was them, and they didn’t have a context of generations of master-slave relations.
>>18403689The reverse is we wuzz-ing because your own people's history was shit and embarrassing.
>Technologically speaking, I think they can really only be harshly criticized for their lack of nautical abilityWest African sailors travelled to the coast of Kongo before Europeans and made extensive use of the Niger river
>>18404145It's more like they enslaved each other and the rest of the world took advantage. Modern africa is the same warlord ridden black continent it used to be.
>>18404230>It's more like they enslaved each other and the rest of the world took advantageThe vast majority of slaves exported to the Americas came from the Portuguese colony of Angola, far more than all of West Africa combined. Not to mention that states like Benin banned it for most of the early modern period. The phenomenon wasn't even exclusive to the continent of Africa
>>18403611Probably because they're the ancestors of black Americans so they're too close in people's minds to those bad stereotypes, fair or not.
>>18403622>BlacksYou could say so, East Africans especially made a fortune from selling castrated slaves to the Arab merchants.>AsiansLul what? Iran, India, and China already had highly developed civilizations before Muhammad and his descendants founded the caliphates.>HispanicsI assume you mean Iberians? In that case I'd also argue that this is not the case, the Andalusians did some cool shit but most did not consider themselves Arab and had a deep admiration for the Greco-Roman world (as did many of the scholars of the Islamic Golden Age). On top of that, the technologies which allowed Portugal and Spain to build the first truly global empires were gunpowder (brought over from China but innovatived in Europe) and intercontinental sailing which they themselves kickstarted with the invention of the Caravel.>whitesInitially they were somewhat behind but they caught up relatively quickly, retaking Iberia and Southern Italy.>inb4 the OttomansNot Arabs, and even then they only really held on to the Balkans which were impoverished and constantly resisted their occupation. If it wasn't for the British the Russians and Austrians would've taken it all by the early 19th century.
>>18403718nigger women are the most hideous repulsive monkeys on earth, no one likes those ugly baboonsstop shilling your ugly ass women to other races of men, jamal, no one wants to fuck them
>>18403622Lol
>>18403894>they have bigger cultural and historical influence than Southeast Asians for exampleonly because like I said, they're the performing monkeys of white americans, if blacks hadn't been enslaved and exported to the USA they would be as relevant as abos
>>18403894>Nhkrumah or Sankarano one knows who they are
>>184045951 Many black slaves were chosen for their skills in cultivating particular crops like rice 2 There are many US scientific discoveries that were made by black Americans 3 Without black American culture US soft power would be in the shitters
>>18404608you listed 3 things that only happened because blacks were enslaved and sent to the USA, only african americans are relevant because they're the mascots of the most powerful country in history, sub saharan niggers are irrelevant as fuck despite being billions
>>18403718Keyed
>>184046111 The famous "Moroccan" leather that was used to bind books in Europe actually came from the Sahelian region.2 Most of the gold circulating in medieval Europe was produced in West Africa.3 Kongolese raffia clothes and West African ivory artifacts which were very priced and praised by Portuguese for their quality ended up in prestigious European courts art collections.4 West Africans and East Africans had a big musical influence in the Middle East and North Africa.
>>18404638all of the things you listed prove sub saharans are just peripheral at best to races that are actually relevant (europeans and arabs), sub saharans are irrelevant apes
>>18404650>all of the things you listed prove sub saharans are just peripheralDoubt you understand anything of what I just wrote>sub saharans are irrelevant apesAnd yet European slave owners needed their farming expertise
>>18404653>Doubt you understand anything of what I just wroteyou wrote that niggers are only slightly relevant for interacting with races that are actually relevant>And yet European slave owners needed their farming expertisethey just needed slaves lol sub saharans are only acknowledged for selling their own race into slavery to races that are actually the relevant ones, if not they would just be abos 2.0
>>18403611>Technologically speaking, I think they can really only be harshly criticized for their lack of nautical abilitywym? they sailed rivers and had watercraft like everyone else. Keep in mind most inland Eurasian populatioons were not seafaring
>>18403723They literally are jesters for white hegemony and yes, some retarded normies imitate them because normies are retarded, blacks are like a race of junk food, popular but extremely shitty in every sense
>>18404661They taught European slave owners how to farm rice and sorghum. What little seamonkeys taught Europeans ?
>>18404661>you wrote that niggers are only slightly relevant for interacting with races that are actually relevantNope I wrote about how much Africans have contributed to the global economy especially the European one whereas Europe didn't really contribute much of the internal developments in Africa prior to the industrial era, as OP stated agriculture and metallurgy were independently developed in West Africa and there was very little that Europeans merchants had that Africans wanted.>they just needed slaves lolBecause there were crops that Europeans didn't know how to grow... are you illiterate anon?>selling their own raceNo one viewed themselves as being part of this supposed "black race" before colonialism, it's an identity that was imposed by Europeans
>>18404678why is every single one of your examples in relation to how much your race is a slave to your white mastas?
>>18404681at least learn English before typing little seamonkey
>>18404684your race will always be the pets of white people, that's your biggest achievement really
>>18404690and your race always will be sex meat to them both women and men
>>18404688>Because sub saharan africa was and still is an irrelevant shithole, dumbass, peripheral states contribute to the relevant imperial statesLmao love the attempt at deflectionbut doesn't change the reality the pre industrial Europe had nothing to offer besides firearms>so? The same could apply to any other non-european race, that doesn't make sub saharan apes relevant in the slightestTriggered much? Africans didn't needed help to grow foreign crops and fruits>I know, in fact niggers killed and raped each other all the time and they still doIsn't that the history of humanity?
>>18404696so ? negro-white mix is still miles ahead in IQ and physical beauty than seamonkey-white/Korean/, Indian one
>>18404702didn't read lol sub saharan africa is objectively an historically irrelevant shithole, stick to dancing and chasing balls for your white mastas jamal
>>18404706that's what seamonkey men and women do for their white masters thoeverbeit
If i remember correctly the gulf of Guinea was very dangerous for ships even the portuguese in the 16th century had problems with it
>>18404620
>>18404706>didn't read lolHoly moly so you really are illiterate
>>18404705>than seamonkey-white/Korean/, Indian oneI don't give a shit about racemixing with other women because I'm not a self hating cuck like the average black
>>18404712Sexo
>>18404712>ayo pls fuck our women pathetic lol why don't fuck them yourself jamal? is your race that ugly to you?
>>18404708ok plantation rapebaby
>>18404720Is that your cope for black and brown baddies rejecting you?Whats next you are gonna tell us that you are virgin by choice?
>>18404733I don't base my worth on the approval of the females, much less females of other races, I don't need to be atttactive to any other women except the women of my own race, you on the other hand, are a pathetic nigger who knows his race is objectively inferior, hence why you want to reproduce with a non-nigger to improve your shitty, ugly, inferior bloodline
>>18404738So you are virgin, thanks for the confirmation anon
>>18404744yet another nigger projection
>>18404561>India>already had highly developed civilizationsYou know, you almost fooled me Shivansh
>>18403914>And kept up in those areas with the rest of the world for centuries. Despite the fact that most of the region didn't use plough agricultural productivity was higher than in places like West Asia and North Africa, a British official operating in Gold Coast in the mid 19th century reported yields approaching the vicinity of 40 bushel per acre.My understanding is that relative to other subregions of Eurasia, Sub-Saharan Africa, including West Africa, was fairly lightly populated in comparison. Even though West Africa was overall more "developed" than anywhere else in Sub-Saharan Africa outside of the Horn that had Aksum and Ethiopic successor kingdoms.
>>18404771>My understanding is that relative to other subregions of Eurasia, Sub-Saharan Africa, including West Africa, was fairly lightly populated in comparison.Population density in areas like the Lower Guinea Coast during the 18th century was estimated to be almost as high as the one in the European heartland of the Rhine Valley and Northern Italy (Thornton, The Historian and the Precolonial African Economy, p 51)
>>18404696> nigger men worship non-nigger womenThis is only somewhat true in america, where black men rate AA women with high SSA lower than white men do. The males of all races practice homophily.
>>18404784*AA men
>>18404696>>18404784In my opinion a lot of that dynamic disproportionately comes down to the fact that Afro-texture hair doesn't how length in the same way as loose hair, the visual properties are different, and in the West especially long hair is associated with women and femininity very strongly. Obviously there are ways to get longer hair, but still. And obviously Black men are attracted to Black women.
>>18404817nigger hair is ugly as shit>And obviously Black men are attracted to Black women.no they aren't, even an isolated nigger from a sub saharan tribe would worship literally any non-nigger female if he encountered one, blacks are a race of self hating cucks
The WHG (native Europeans) were arguably dumber than Africans. No agriculture, no metallurgy, no pottery, nothing.
>>18404822True. Blacks are actually somewhat impressive when you look at how long they've been farming; it only took them ~2000 years to develop iron metallurgy.
>>18404784>The males of all races practice homophilyAll men are gay?
>>18403611>Why were West-Africans so slandered?Long story short it's because humans are naturally evil. They're happy to completely dehumanize an entire race of people if it meant they got to be part of the "better" group that looked down on them. Because that strokes their ego and gets to be one extra thing that keeps them from having to reflect on themselves.
>>18404836>naturally evil No such thing as evil, life is a competitionSimple as
>>18404784Black men are the equivalent of Asian women, basically race traitors who are disgusted by the opposite gender of their respective races because deep down, they consider their race aesthetically inferior to other races
>>18403718You're thinking of Italians.
>>18403611Whenever I want to know the truth on question (like did niggers independently come up with metal working) I ask ChatGPT what famous 19th century researchers thought about the question.
>>18403718I too love long legs and fat asses
>>18403611Slavery. Westoids had to dehumanize the peoples they were enslaving, and that was mostly agrarians and not jungle hunter-gatherers (who were far less numerous and far harder to capture)
>>18404838dumb
>>18404936Shut the fuck up faggot, everyone including you competes for literally everything
>>18404608>Without black American culture US soft power would be in the shittersOnly musically (and even there it was mostly white musicians playing music that originated in black culture at least until rap garbage took over). Coca Cola, Hollywood, McDonalds, and all the other American cultural landmarks were all whites or Jews.
>>18404729but thats the thing, arabs castrated their slaves, whites came out with a Blacked fetishthese two are not the same
>>18404946and that's about as substantial a note as saying we breath
>>18404849Unbelievable trvke
>>18403695Bait
>>18404724No ones forcing you to fuck black women...its not like one would want to fuck you anyways...
>>18404756They were the first ones to invent sewage..tho its alien technology nowadays
>>18404946Einstein!!!
>>18404954 #>Only musicallyMusic is by far US biggest cultural export.Black culture also had a huge impact in the slang and fashion>all whites or Jews.You said white twice
>>18404954>all whites or JewsYou said Jews twice.
70 years of relentless propaganda still has not turned blacks into humans
>>18405234> That is NOT found in the DNA of present-day Asians or CaucasiansThis wasn't even true in the original study that confirmed it's existence, they explicitly stated that it was detected in Mormons and Chinese people. More recent ones have detected it in all humans. Furthermore, you intentionally misrepresent the data; 2-19% reffered to the potential average and it was suggested that the answer was closest to 7%. Also, it is almost certainly homo heidelbergensis.
>>18405275If I'm not mistaken, blacks are more closely related to Denisovans and Neanderthals than at least some groups that actually have their DNA. Would also align best with the suggested split time.
>>18405277source, everywhere I look the opposite is the case unless you think melanese are black
>>18405543I don't recall the exact source, but I still have the figures.
>>18405747
>>18405275>it was detected in Mormonswell that checks out
>>18405995"Mormon" was obviously used there as a euphemism for Utah Whites.
>>18405275>it was detected in MormonsWhy them in particular?
>>18406267That's just who was tested. More recent studies find it literally everywhere, just peaking in Africans.
>>18406315>>18405747>>18405750The Pygmy' and Khoisan are the one's most related to the known archaics, so the west-african ghost hominid probably isn't so western after all. The Pygmy are significantly mixed with bantus in modern day BTW.
>>18403632tell me more>>18403887>>18403720elaborate
>>18406323Iirc iron metallurgy in West-Africa started in Nigeria and is like, 3500 years old, whereas mettalurgy in North Africa is only around 2700 years old. I don't know enough about North African mettalurgy to make great comment on their differences, but I'm pretty sure the North Africans used water while the West-Africans didn't.
>>18406400The forging of new tools was sort of a special event in at least a few West-African cultures. There's this documentary about it that I didn't finish, brb.
>>18406401https://youtu.be/RuCnZClWwpQ?si=tdXFbDkEnCs-8fCA
>>18406402>>18406401danke
>>18404906>I'm brown and gay and a Jew told me this.Not a valid source, this isn't a university. There's no need to dehumanize anyone when noting the obvious differences between Europeans building steam ships and one of the crudest races on earth.
>>18404608is this bait. Just LMAO. nice job I guess
>>18405275>detected in Mormons and Chinese peoplesource?
>>18406412You are desperate to feel like you are a part of something. Men' this is whay happens when kids gets neglected for too long and grows up.
>>18404962>arabs castrated their slavesNot really, if you mean harem guards then those got castrated regardless of race also in the MENA there were slaves of all races and of indigenous peoples in the region. Marsh Arabs tended to be a victim of it and were a major group in the slave rebellions back in the day.
>>18403611Blacks are literal cavemen compared to every other ethnicity on the planet (except for abos, who are straight up Home Erectus). Blacks never developed writing, farming, metal working, domesticating animals, sailing, etc. literally everything that constitutes civilization was handed to them by outsiders.
>>18407529>Blacks never developed writing, farming, metal working, domesticating animals, sailing, etc. literally everything that constitutes civilization was handed to them by outsiders.Wow that also describes literally everyone on Earth too!!
>>18403611no stone architecture. also, their american descendants via the slave trade are absolutely retarded
>>18407557>no stone architectureThe thing is only retards on this board care about stone specifically and foreign writers have written a ton about local building styles and methods.>their american descendants via the slave trade are absolutely retardedThat seems super petty to say. The only reason why people say that about them or any American is because the US is the most watched state on Earth in general. I don't see any reason to call them or any American exceptionally retarded.
>>18407567That and many places have their on unfortunately super storied histories with racism towards West Africans without any American involvement or influence. Hell Euros in 20th century colonial Africa were wagging their fingers at the severity of their bigotry/petty obssession towards blacks while being equally as bad or notably worse and calquing new world racial/racist terms innthe meanwhile into their old world regimes.
>>18403611>and even those mud huts everyone hates were only universal amongst poorsThe mud hut was the average dwelling in precolonial Subsaharan Africa virtually everywhere outside of a few Sahelian and Somalian cities.It was the norm, not the exception.Even capital cities of kingdoms had them.
>>18403894>now West Africans and its diaspora and you have Kobe Bryant, Michael Jackson, maybe Nhkrumah or Sankara just off the top of the headFirst two are Americans, and anyone who knows Sankara likely also know Pol Pot
>>18407602>The mud hut was the average dwelling in precolonial Subsaharan AfricaWhy call every structure a "mud hut"?>everywhere outside of a few Sahelian and Somalian cities.You can't even do basic research?>It was the norm, not the exception.>Even capital cities of kingdoms had them.And why do you fixate on it so much? You do know capitals worldwide back in the day had a massive spectrum in housing too between those higher up in the heriachy and the common masses?
>>18407529So what? Their women give me a boner
>>18403723Why though? I never found "gangsta" behaviors one bit enticing. And the music is awful.>>18404906>WestoidEasiest way to tell someone brown typed this post, dead giveaway.
>>18407526At least I have a father
>>18407798I WILL inject her with my white seed and we WILL produce mixed offspring that carry my superior white genetics. We will save Africa one woman at a time until our genes are widespread and our eugenics program will be successful. Every white man deserves a Nubian goddess.
>>18407529>>18407557The rage bait isn't as effective if it isn't true. Why the lies though?
>>18407808Blacks invented Jazz Cope about how "I don't like Jazz"Guess what? A lot of other white people do love Jazz.
>>18407824At least fetishize a good looking foid.That woman just looks ill
>>18407968Cope
>>18407529>Slavs are literal cavemen compared to every other ethnicity on the planet (except for abos, who are straight up Home Erectus). Slavs never developed writing, farming, metal working, domesticating animals, sailing, etc. literally everything that constitutes civilization was handed to them by outsidersFify
>>18407624>Why call every structure a "mud hut"?You're right I used that term incorrectlyBy "mud hut" I actually mean the neolithic round hut everyone (rightfully) associates with African architectureTechnically the Sahelian huts, though more advanced than the Subsaharan average, were also made of mud, and are thus also mudhuts
>>18408082>Mud hutInteresting way to describe timber framed structures with multiple floors and rooms
>>18407602Which is precisely why I said they were only universal amongst poors rather than claiming that they were limited to them.
>>18407519Sorry for my lateness.
>>18408623https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015685/
>>18408082>By "mud hut" I actually mean the neolithic round hut everyone (rightfully) associates with African architectureCountless counter examples anon.>the Sahelian huts, though more advanced than the Subsaharan average, were also made of mud, and are thus also mudhutsSo why hate mud and adobe as a construction material which I 'll mention wasn't the only thing used? You honestly think it was just solely mud and nothing else?
>>18406415Everything he mentioned was at least 50% true besides the scientific achievement one; I can't think of a single black contribution in that area, and I'm actually black.
>>18404670I straight up didn't know that they had boats. Blacks were probably invited to madagascar and I've heard actual proud africans effectively insult their own abilities in that area, so I thought it was accurate. I imagine this applies primarily to some specific areas?
>>18405053> You said white twiceIf jews are white, then so are american mullatos. Both are 60% white, and for jews, that's actually a higher estimate iirc.
>>18408788I did google search I and you lied anon and I'm not even American. I find black girls hot though
>>18408125The royal palace on your pic doesnt have multiple floors though
>>18408949And you are shifting the goalposts.
"Western Civlilization" itself is "Black"using the disparate races as expendable livestock to be used, managed and ultimately disposed of, because these affairs extend beyond the useful idiots that help validate itso pledge your allegiance, pay your tithes, and prostate before the sacrificial altar because the meta remains that the cattle will forever be Built for the Big Black Cockbecause you live on a Animal Farm, lest we forget
>>18408949 British accounts confirm that all the nobles lived in 2 floor houses, which includes the substitute palace made after the British destroyed the first one.
>>18409070As per usual from /pol/bitch>>18409070Nice attempt at derailng /pol/bitch
>>18406317>>18406317>The Pygmy are significantly mixed with bantus in modern day BTW.no they are only related to their neighbours they are very distant to any other group especially west africans, you are looking at one gene not total fst genes shared. Obviously Africans are going to be more closely related to older groups they are an older population this doesn't say anything about decent.
>>18409050And you're claiming shit that's not real kek. Your average African lived in mud and thatch and they still do today.
>>18409259>2 storyPathetic>Also surrounded by mudhutsSad!
>>18409563>Your average AfricanNew goalpost unlocked
>>18409565A drawing Anon are you for real lmao
>>18409565>Gets desperate so he posts an idealised illustrationAyo
>>18409567Those are shithole hovels
>>18409570>>18409573>OH NO OH NO OH NO
>>18409570>>18409573OH NO OH NO OH NO BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA>You see Africa wasn't a shithole because the 1% of the 1% got to live in a shack which roughly matches that of a medieval serfs homeDamn you showed me. But why were they living like that up until colonization during the 1800’s?
>>18408797>I've heard actual proud africans effectively insult their own abilities in that area,they're normies, no more knowledgeable about their history than your average white normie is knowledgeable about his.
>>18409567>>18409570>>18409573This is what the 1% of Whites got to live in during the same time period. Where is the African equivalent?
>>18409565Most places in Europe and Asia at the had around 2-3 floors at the time. >Also surrounded by mudhutsThey are timber framed structures probably apartments for the servants >>18409577>>18409580Those are random images you found on Google anon >>18409597 Where is the African equivalent?The pic I posted only shows a small portion of the stone building, which in turn was a small part of the palace complex, described by the British as an immense building with courtyards big enough to contain 300 people each and indoor plumbing in the upper floors.
>>18409278yet the fact remains, considering the white man only has what is given to hima residue of yearning imprinted as if you were a suckling calf and provided an upright identity distant from your humble beginningsnow you reflect the image of your masters
>>18409577>>18409580>>18409581>>18409597>>18409565>Schizopost in desperation Anon...
>>18409577That's a royal palace btw
>>18409563>Your average African lived in mud and thatch and they still do today.No. Like im not sure why you keep doing this. Are you that crazy half-Filipino guy from Australia? There's some crazy Filipino descent poster who posts about "mudhuts" all day.
>>18410321bazed benin :DDDDDDmy ansgezdors :DDDD
>>18409259Kek this tiny fortress was literally designed by the Dutch, who also carved the stones for the negroesThe fact this is the greatest thing you could find is sad
>>18410325The average African definitely lived in mud huts before colonial rule.They no longer do though, a courtesy of whitey who built them proper cities
>>18409786>>18409070
>>18404896I like black tits
>>18410321>20th century The palace was burned down by the Brits in late 19th century and the few pics we have look nothing like that. That is just a random section of the city in ruins lmao did you edited the caption or got fooled by AI?>>18410332>was literally designed by the Dutch,Based on what evidence exactly? Even the Wikipedia article you lazily posted states that the building followed Asante architectural features and that the labour also included Fante masons.When you use Wikipedia make sure to read the whole article Anon
>>18410697And primary sources make no mention of the Dutch just the Fante
>>18410697>coping this hardYes Anon. I'm sure naked jungle dwellers constructed grand cities and structures, but, like Wakanda, were lost prior to the White mans discovery (or did they steal it?). Anyways if Afrixans were at all advanced then they shouldn't have been so easy to conquer. But they were so *shrug*
>>18410986>But they were so *shrug*Not really? Most of the conquests in the euro empires across Asia and Europe were pretty late. Also you point makes no sense when France collapsed faster than Poland to Nazi Germany and the intervention of the US and Soviets was the sole reason they all didn't get wrecked. Like why embarass yourself like this? We get it, you hate yourself or something and you lash out on a dead board because you failed to thrive growing up.
>>18411009Asia and Africa*
>>18410986Your attempt at gaslighting to deflect from the fact that you were using image AI chatbot gave you are pathetic.Abomey royal palace was also mostly destroyed but I see nothing wrong with the timber framed structures that survived.>But they were so *shrug*Oh really is that why European only started to win major battles in West Africa in the second half of the 19th century?Even a mid regional power like Dahomey easily took over a Dutch and a French fort
>>18410986if africans were so easy to conquer then why did europe never manage to get anything beyond coastal forts until the 19th century
>>18411094why bother when africans enslave each other on their own
>>18410346
>>18411127Except that Europeans had been trying to find access routes to the hinterland since the 15th century and it was not just West Africa, after the defeat at Kitombo the Portuguese had to postpone their plans to conquer Kongo and its vassals.
>>18411347also>human I was being extremely generous there
>>18410616Name please?
>>18411412Idk
>>18411128Kek
>>18410986opulent!
>>18411031>but I see nothing wrongYou mean besides the fact it looks like the restroom shack of some camp ground even tho it's supposed to be a royal palace?>European only started to win major battles in West Africa in the second half of the 19th centuryYeah that's also the moment they started fighting battles there in the first place
>>18411721>that's also the moment they started fighting battles there in the first placeFalse. For Kongo they baaically were trying to get an in on the state and it took centuries before the eventual collapse from internal power politics gave Portugal an opportunity. The Dutch tried to have a go in the region too.
>>18411347>europeans never gave that much of a shitLmao peak sour grapes.>why invest so many resources in expeditions when you can easily just buy nigger slaves from the local ooga booga kang?Countless forts and incursion attempts and military movements says otherwise.
>>18411767There wasn't really a plan to settle the entire continent, it's always been too much of a shithole filled with creatures that are so visually horrendous no one would like to live there, in South Africa, however (the only actual place where europeans had an actual plan to settle where europeans did plan to settle), they did so easily and humilliated the africans so fucking hard that the entire world begged them to stop cucking them so much with apartheid>>18411767
>>18403622>piggy-backed off the Arabs>off the Arabs>Arabs
>>18411721>You mean besides the fact it looks like the restroom shack of some camp ground even tho it's supposed to be a royal palace? Nah it doesn't you are just mad for being proved wrong and then exposed for asking the AI chatbot for help.>Yeah that's also the moment they started fighting battles there in the first placeThey started in the 15th century, Portuguese tried to raid some villages in the Senegambian region only to got their ass kicked by the locals, which is why they started moving south and targeted less developed area in terms of military power >>18411873>There wasn't really a plan to settle the entire continent, it's always been too much of a shitholePortuguese founded the settle colonies of Angola and Mozambique, some of them moved to Kongo and married local women. In the later centuries Europeans founded settlements near the forts in West Africa and sometimes married locals.Are you gonna randomly post images of European castles to deflect from this claim too?
>>18411417God I wish I had a black gf
