[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (2.31 MB, 863x1390)
2.31 MB
2.31 MB PNG
Is it possible that gypsies are related to the old druids? We know the druids disappeared, we know Romani people are Aryans, and we know English/Roman law hated both of them. Pure coincidence?
>>
>>18405010
Bait thread
>>
>>18405014
Howso?
>>
>>18405047
They’re from Northern India
>>
>>18405052
Why the fuck would Pakistanis go all the way to England unless their kin had been there too? They are from the Aryan language family.
>>
>>18405010
One thing should be made clear:

Gypsy: Someone who is descended from people who were expelled from India around 1400.
Irish traveller: Someone who is a full blooded Irishman, thus not a Gypsy.
>>
>>18405083
>Gypsy: Someone who is descended from people who were expelled from India around 1400.

I feel like there's a connection here with the people who call themselves Jews. The Khazars could have been Persians who migrated north during the Zoroastrian orthodoxy 200-600 AD in Persia, and the Gypsies migrated out of the same region and into the same region. Perhaps the Khazars tried to "adopt" the Gypsies for their operational purposes. Obviously some gypsies stayed as gypsies, but perhaps others were roped into Khazar activities.
>>
>>18405531
Ashkenazi Jews are from the levant and not Persia.
>>
>>18405910
Where in the "levant"?

The Ascanius tribe (of which Julius Caesar was a member) supposedly comes from Cappadocia/Armenia/Hyrcania. That's not the Levant, although that is where some of the stories of the Levant could source from. Enoch might be the connection... that's myth of Wolf Country in the Levant.
>>
>>18405978
>myth of Wolf Country in the Levant.
Or perhaps I should say, the wolf in the land of the snake. Benjamin and Dan. Dan = Phoenician = Venetian. Benjamin = Judah = Roman.
>>
haploautism deniers are responsible for these garbage /x/ tier threads btw
>>
>>18406007
Elites don't move with their native population. At any point back in time, we could say that they weren't native to that place. Maybe over 10k years ago, we could say everyone was in their true native location, which even then I would seriously doubt, but that has no bearing on the past 10k years.

Haploautism tells you about populations, but not the movement of elites since the agricultural revolution.
>>
>>18406016
except when they analyze the remains of lavish tombs? but im sure we're missing the trvth about pashtun/albanese/basque elites civilizing everyone o algo
>>
>>18406034
I don't know how much we have of that. Is there a book or something you'd recommend?
>>
>>18406007
>saar the gypsy samples are 34% I2c while romanian samples are only 29% I2c this means that the gypsies are descended from swedish (56% I2c) BVLLS that colonised the romanian shudra dalits saaaaarrrr
>>
>>18406007
It's impossible to study history if you are a race denier. It's impossible to study race if you believe in 19th century Anglo retardation like the three race theory, phrenology, etc. Haplogroups are genetics, and genetics are based.
>>
>>18406063
>racism: hipster edition
>>
>>18406093
No, you're an "-ism". Now I win because I have pathologized your worldview.

Faggot.
>>
>>18406109
just be racist if you want to be bro, you don't need to act like a hipster about it
>>
>>18406112
>If you are willing to go where the data takes you, you're just being a hipster about your bias
Ok bro.
You sound insecure.
>>
>>18405010
God I want to sniff those stinky gyppo feet
>>
>>18405010
Gypsies=groups formed somewhere in Anatolia or the Balkans from members of a general Indian diaspora who transitioned to a nomadic lifestyle (around the same time a bunch of other itinerant groups emerged, of fully European origins: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itinerant_groups_in_Europe ). There is no answer to the question where the Gypsies came from because they didn't arrive in one group, they blended together long after their ancestors migrated West.

Everything recognized as Gypsy culture (dress, music etc.) today besides their language can be traced back to archaic Balkan culture. There is nothing really Indian about it anymore, and there is no recorded Gypsy folklore about their migration from Asia. It seemed that when they formed as groups disctinct from Europeans and Turky, they were already somewhat assimilated.
>>
>>18406416
This was very informative and makes a lot of sense. Thank you.
>>
>>18406416
Right but why do they behave like niggers though
>>
>>18406093
>>18406112
Haplofags single handedly saved racial science discourse. The only reason libtards won the culture war on that front is because low IQ retards like you kept discrediting the entire field of anthropology by dogmatically worshipping the half baked writings of retards from 1800.
>>
>>18405083
>Irish traveller: Someone who is a full blooded Irishman, thus not a Gypsy.
They're colloquially Gypsies too, just not Romani or of Indian descent.

>>18405910
Ashkenazi Jews have multiple possible points of origin and none of them are in the Levant. Anatolia is the closest possible origin of them.
>>
>>18407862
Literally no one outside your haploautist corners of the internet cares about which pottery culture raped another pottery culture 10,000 years ago
>>
>>18410265
>>18411768
You got less than 26 posts in 4 days bro, time to let it go



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.