[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 12673.jpg (1.72 MB, 2365x1888)
1.72 MB
1.72 MB JPG
I read on the internet a common origin for some names of gods in different Indo-European languages: - Lithuanian Vělinas - Gaulish Vellaunos - And Vedic Váruṇaḥ

These names may derive from *Ṷelonos, *Ṷelunos, or another derivative with "n" from the root *ṷel- "to see". Is this legitimate?
>>
>>18405612
First, if the names are similar, determine if they have regular sound correspondences.
Second, determine if the words have similar meanings and if the gods have similar themes.

>Lithuanian Vělinas
>Vedic Váruṇaḥ
These vowels are wrong. Keep tables like these handy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ThaesOfereode/Indo-European_sound_correspondences

Also ⟨ě⟩ is not standard Lithuanian orthography. Did you actually copy a Lithuanian word? Perhaps ⟨ė⟩ was intended.
>>
>>18405782
I copied this from an article I read. But then there's no similarity between these terms? None at all? Varuna is a Vedic innovation apparently, but I read that there are several words with *ṷel-
>>
>>18405872
You're not giving us much to go by. The correct spelling of the Lithuanian word needs clarification. I suppose the root *u̯el- could potentially be involved in one or more terms, but you haven't provided any meanings of these words or associated themes.
If the Lithuanian word is correctly spelled ⟨Vėl-⟩ then we have an unexpected long vowel.
>>
>>18405782
Stop humiliating others, you egocentric jerk.
>>
>>18405899
>>
>>18405907
This guy thinks he's the best, but I've already humiliated him three times in a discussion about the etymology of "Poseidon," which, ironically, he insisted was related to "varuna," and he plays this huge mental game about water droplets and the ocean being related.
>>
>>18405612
I don't think so
PIEs would hardly worship a water deity.
>>
>>18405921
What would stop them?
>>
>>18405922
Perhaps it's because they live on the steppe? There's no ocean there Dhur
>>
>>18405931
But that's false the oldest cultures of the Iberian Peninsula also lived near the Black Sea, and in all branches there is a word for ocean.
>>
>>18405917
>>18405907
meds
>>
>>18405911
>*U̯elonos, *U̯elunos
A variation *-onus ~ *-unos doesn't make much sense, and I'm not sure why the author gives this. It is possible that the words involved use the root *u̯el- but, again, the Lithuanian word still needs clarification.

>In the study of the PIE gods, however, if one restricts one's search to cognate correspondences in the names (as if one were searching for cognate words) and insists on considering only gods with linguistically cognate names as having a common origin, one would draw the false conclusion that PIE religion was sparsely populated with gods in comparison to the later cults. Instead of concentrating totally upon the phonology of a particular name (which is but a single aspect of the entire complex of motifs surrounding a particular deity), one must look at the whole attribute structure surrounding each of the otherwise cognate gods (a major aspect of which is the total semantic field generated by all of the bynames of the particular deity). One should recall that in the comparative field of folklore, changing the names of the characters in a folktale does not change the tale's location in the Motif Index. Thus a deity, like a folktale, must be defined by the total motif repertoire. The complex of bynames is but one subfield among the total field of all of the attributes of a particular deity.
I agree with this paragraph.
>>
>>18406061
OP eurocentric btw
>>
>>18406067
meds
>>
>>18405612
Probably. The Baltic languages (especially Old Lithuanian) are noted for preserving some very Vedic-sounding words, including deity names.
Here's some other examples.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dievas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%C5%A1vieniai
There's also a Parjanya/Perkunos, and a personification of literal wind named Vejas/Vejo(patis) similar to the Hindu Vayu (literally air) and other more dubious examples.
>>
>>18406077
According to this guy>>18406061
Doesn't fit well
>and other more dubious examples.
For example? Parjanya/Perkunos From what I could understand, there is a parallel of perkunos in practically all branches, even possibly in the Thracian, and an epithet for Zeus.
>>
>>18405782
Saar
>>
>>18406061
I did a quick search and the author did indeed mean ⟨Vėl-⟩.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithuanian_mythology#Gods_and_mythological_figures
>Velnias (Velas, Velinas) – chthonic god of the underworld, related to the cult of dead.[30] The root of the word is the same as of Lithuanian: vėlė ('soul of the deceased'). After the introduction of Christianity, it was equated with evil, and Velnias became the Lithuanian name for devil. In some tales, Velnias (the devil) was the first owner of fire. God sent a swallow, which managed to steal the fire.[31]
Note that ⟨vėlė⟩ "soul of the deceased" has a long vowel and comes from the root *u̯elh3- “death”. I assume the long ⟨ė⟩ is the result of vṛddhi, which was a productive process in Balto-Slavic.
>>
>>18405782
Firster than your first of all, all languages and philosophies of indoeurasia share one single common origin point. The real redpill is that there are no "germanic and romance languages". If you go back far enough, you'll see that they both share the same root.
>>
File: Vallaunus.png (401 KB, 2086x1064)
401 KB
401 KB PNG
>>18405612
>Gaulish Vellaunos
https://lexlep.univie.ac.at/wiki/u%CC%AFallau%CC%AFn-
>The element uellaun-/uallaun- is widely attested in Celtic onomastics: Gaulish personal names (uellaunus, uercassiuellaunus, ualauna), theonyms (icouellauna), ethnonyms (κατουελλαυοί, segouellauni) and toponyms (uellaunodunum); OBrit. personal names (cassiuellaunus, dubnouellaunus, ualauneicus) and ethnonyms (catuuellauni), OW -gwallawn (cadwallaun, MW casswallawn); Ogam valamni (CIIC 125), OIr. folloman; lexically in OIr. *follomon- 'ruler, chief' ( follaimnigid 'rules', etc.). See Holder 1896-1907: III 94, KGP: 288 f., GPN: 272–277 (with older literature), Lambert 1990: 206–208, DLG: 311, Delamarre 2007: 188, 235.
>>
>>18406238
>Wikipedia
>>
>>18406597
Yes, varuna its a indian god
Not "pie"
>>
>>18406677
We know
>>
File: Olsen Varuna.png (627 KB, 1432x1670)
627 KB
627 KB PNG
>>18405612
>Vedic Váruṇaḥ
I took a minute to find a reasonable analysis of this word for you.
In short, it appears to reflect PIE *u̯elHu-mn+ó- and is cognate with
• Lat ⟨volūmen⟩
• Gk ⟨eílūma⟩
• Arm ⟨gelowmn⟩
https://logeion.uchicago.edu/%CE%B5%E1%BC%B4%CE%BB%CF%85%CE%BC%CE%B1
>>
>>18406238
Stop using Wikipedia

it cites Gimbutas, which is totally biased and outdated.
>>
Andajus=indra??
>>
>>18406843
Hi! Thanks for the help. And please don't think I'm one of those guys who are disrupting my thread If you could post the links for us, that would be great.
>>
>>18406844
OP won't even bother to look up the words to see how they're actually spelled.
>>
>>18406854
https://www.stockholmuniversitypress.se/books/121/files/dac7c245-c7c2-4b4f-9dc8-fbbcb2509aa3.pdf
>>
>>18406843
So we have a problem here. Either Varuna in Vedic wasn't even the name of this god but an epithet, which is unlikely given that we have an inscription in Mittani, or perhaps the old theory that Varuna wasn't a sea god is correct.
>>
>>18406862
Thank you lil anon you are kind.
>>
>>18406843
>>18406597
>>18405612
We need to overcome this bias we have when studying Indo-European mythology based on Vedic mythology, as if we had full comparative authority on the subject. Not everything should be compared to Vedic mythology, okay? Did you know that Indo-European only arrived in India at the end of the Bronze Age? Europe was Indo-European from the end of the Neolithic period.
>>
>>18406872
>Not everything should be compared to Vedic mythology, okay?
No, everything should be compared. That's the entire point. If we do not compare, then we cannot see what words are similar to other words and what themes are similar to other themes.
Without the comparative method, you have no way to verify or debunk.
>>
>>18406852
I didn't find any information online, only a blog post by larpagan that apparently "Andajus" was linked to serpents and was more like an a primordial being. I think I agree with him>>18406872
Perhaps Indra and Varuna are innovations.
>>
>>18406875
You're not understanding. I said that we should stop using Vedic mythology as a kind of core or bias when comparing myths, when in the thread we were asking:
>Where is myth X from the Vedas in Europe?
>Where is Vedic God Y in Europe?

And so on, sometimes it seems that Vedic mythology is the comparative source of everything, and it isn't. Believe it or not, we have more preservation of Hellenic myths than Vedic ones, which are restricted to poetry.
>>
>>18406875
>comparative method
Dead Science
>>
>>18406877
Ok
>>
>>18406862
You're the first to discredit other people's sources, and then you post a poorly cited source like this?
>>
>>18406862
Loved the article
>>
Considering Varuna's aspect as a god associated with death, in an abstract way (bcause Yama being the "god of death" himself, like Hades), allows us to compare him with other Indo-European gods who share a common root, as already mentioneh here
>>
>>18406958
Varuna wasn't a god of sea
>>
>>18406958
It's very helpful to have an accurate etymology for a god like Varuna even if no other IE gods have that precise name. It allows us to compare themes associated with Varuna's name.
>>
>>18406958
>>18407127
Varuna is indic deity not IE
>>
>>18406881
But maruts is cognate with roman mars
>>
>>18407130
>wishful thinking
>>
>>18406958
Nice reference to kurgans at the end
>>
>>18405782
The gods do not always share themes with their cognates, it's very frequent that pantheons see roles shift to different gods. See: Zeus/Jupiter vs Tyr, close etymological relatives, but role shifts entirely to thunor or w/e in germanic pantheon.
>>
>>18407198
Yes. Its a PIE heritage
>>
>>18407195
You guys couldn't prove me wrong
>>
>>18407299
You didn't make an argument.
You expressed what you wish to be true.
>>
>>18407325
Show me the nordic varuna
>>
>>18407338
That's not an argument either. You are pitifully dumb.
>>
>>18407345
I accept your defeat
>>
>>18407351
I haven't made any claims. You made a claim without evidence. You defeated yourself and I just observed.
>>
So: varuna its a Indic god
>>
>>18407359
>varuna its a Indic god
No evidence for this has been presented. You are hallucinating.
>>
Although it's not possible to find a varuna in other Indo-European branches, unfortunately for the cods, the vast majority of their myths are Indo-European. West has a good entry on this in his Indo-European poetry and mythology.

Apam napat is PIE. But of course, someone could make a thread specifically for these myths, but I forgot that 2/3 are saars today. The root is the same root word for nephew and nepotism in English, obviously through the Greek for nepotism. I think the Irish Nechtan also has something to do with it? Cry, saars. You guys LOST again
>>
>>18407367
You haven't shown any cognates with varuna yet.
>apam napat
The burden is on you. Where is the evidence? I'm curious.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.