Is this view consistent with historic Christian doctrine?
More or less yeah. Historically the most vocal anti-racists (abolitionists et al) were Christian groups
>Sixth Day People>Nephilim>Curse of HamNo.
>>18405741>protestant>christianenjoy hell
>>18405785Protestant and Christian are two words for the same thing>>18405741If by race we mean human subspecies, yes it’s true
>>18405745None of the Pre-flood beings are relevant. According to the Old Testament we are all ultimately children of Noah regardless of race since everything else but the animals fucking died in a flood.
The amount of time people waste on this shit is incomprehensible.
>>18405786>Protestant and Christian are two words for the same thingenjoy hell
>>18405741Let me guess. He is a zionist?
>>18405741>Is this view consistent with historic Christian doctrine?There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus
Acts 17:26 says that God created all the nations of men from one man. In the Greek, that word for "nation" is ἔθνος or ethnos, which is where we get the word ethnic. In other words, all the races of men are descended from one man, but they exist as distinct groups by God's design.
>>18405745Curse of Ham was a colonial era innovation, Christians before the age of discovery didn't think of black people as cursed to become slaves
