[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Helen_Keller_(circa_1904).jpg (200 KB, 1280x1594)
200 KB
200 KB JPG
Was Helen Killer faking being blind and deaf? Was Helen Keller really blind and deaf but her writings were fake? Was she the real deal? Discuss.
>>
>>18406309
Keller wasn't as disabled as people claim until her 4th or 5th year. Her writings and political activities were tied to her then handler and her husband and conveniantly stopped after changing handlers. The claim that she founded and cofounded various institutions and wrote over a 100 books is pure bogus. Keller's story is fake, but she wasn't the fraud, the frauds were her handlers who used a disabled woman who didn't know any better to promote their own views and ideas. How could she be a fraud when her outside world is filtered through her very opinionated handler and her political activist husband?
>>
>>18406329
This, and worth mentioning that said handlers were Marxists of course.
>>
>>18406309
Bump



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.