How common is it historically for men who had or bragged about sex with multiple women (eg. a king, soldier, celebrity) that he raped at least one of them?Conversely, how common is it for women who had sex with multiple men (eg. a prostitute, queen, or someone who rebelled against society) that she was raped by at least one of them?This post was inspired when I was lurking r/femaledatingstrategy a long time ago, and they probably raise a valid point here. I have a hard time believing that every woman a chad encounters is willing to have sex with him, and especially those chads tend to have the power to do whatever he wants and get away with it.
>>18407605Rape is a social construct that is in the eye of the beholder. Would appreciate if you used objective language on what you mean
>>18407640Literally came here to post this. Rape is a meaningless term in the context you are talking about.
>>18407605Most sex in history was non-consensual to some degree by today's standards. Factor in arranged marriages, war rape, marriages out of financial necessity, marital rape, etc.Men constantly harass women even today, let alone back when there was actual patriarchy in society
>>18407802No such thing as patriarchy. Men's entire existence throughout history was to serve women. Any claim to the contrary is ahistorical.
>>18407605so common that bashing a woman with a club and dragging her back to your cave was the standard mating ritual for far longer than civilization has been around.
>>18407605In the Prehistoric era they had primitive sexual communism (rape)
>>18407802today's standards are based on a historically recent concept of individuality. premodern rape would be more akin to theft from either a woman's father or her husband, both regarded as the representative of a greater family/clan. i would also add that a even in economic marriages a woman is not treated as the exclusive possession of her husband, such marriages tend to include practices like dowries which always belong to the wife and return to her clan's possession if the marriage fails. you could do whatever you wanted to slave, however
>>18407605>I have a hard time believing that every woman a chad encounters is willing to have sex with him, and especially those chads tend to have the power to do whatever he wants and get away with it.Personally I do believe all interaction between men and women is rooted in rape. The reason why men managed to have sex for most of history is because they had genuine patriarchy back then, which Stockholm Syndrome'd women into having sex
