Do the idiots who push this narrative not realize that they're implying that for 200+ years before the Civil War blacks were accepting of slavery?
>>18407713They don't realize anything. Someone at a college wrote a shitty paper about how blacks contributed an insignificant amount to the Union war effort and make it out like they single-handedly won the war for the Union side and that Lincoln was forced to free them because of that. Some even more retarded individuals read the title and maybe some of the abstract and spread some shitty infographics to others. It's an article of faith. No argumentation is involved.
>>18407713I would be rather be a black slave than a modern line cook.
>>18407713There were multiple acts of slave resistance before the Civil War (such as Nat Turner)
>>18408130https://gutenberg.org/ebooks/15333
>>18408130that's just blacks being violent and murderous
>>18407713I mean if they were not running off in numbers enough to make a nuisance of themselves, the slave-hunting would never have reached the level where northerners would've become annoyed enough to go to war in order to reform and socialize US slave ownership.Because that's what happened. Post-Civil War Reforms is the single largest communist institution in the US.
>>18408130That does not in itself constitute blacks freeing themselves
>>18408331I don't think you understand communism
>>18408331lol they didn't even throw out the old shitty constitution that created the problem in the first place like they should have.
