In psalm 69 David asks god to deny entry to heaven for wicked people.
Nothing in the world of the Christian is reality. Ignore it altogether
>>18415583The more correct term would be, "Enjoy Gehenna" because the concept of "Hell" as it has been reinterpreted over the centuries (esp. by Dante) isn't actually Biblical canon
>>18415583Where does it say you can't? If it triggers you, you gotta Romans 12 renew your mind it.
>>18415583Don't judge and you won't be judged
>>18415679The context of that in matthew is not to be hypocritical.
>>18415681says who?
>>18415688Jesus
>>18415583«ALLOWED»? THERE IS NO CATHOLICAL MORAL POLICE FORCE, NOR A CATHOLICAL MORAL JUDICIAL CODE; YOU MEAN TO ASK IF IT IS MORALLY REPREHENSIBLE.IT IS NOT MORALLY REPREHENSIBLE, ALTHOUGH, SUCH IRONICAL SCORN SHOULD NOT BE USED FRIVOLOUSLY, SINCE IT IS SEVERE.
>>18415700Enjoy Hell, Catholic! (And I don't use that frivolously)
It’s ok to say enjoy hell if you’re trying to wake someone up to the reality of their sin and its consequences
Jesus had amnesia
Isn't it kind of fucked up to send people to hell in a deterministic universe?"Enjoy hell" is cruel and sick, but at least makes sense in a framework where one has the free will to choose to have faith in a religion which lacks any evidence.But in a deterministic world, saying "enjoy hell" to nonbelievers takes on an even more twisted aspect, don't you think?
>>18416124The world belongs to assertive people, the true jesus was non assertive. The antichrist was assertive. Whenever you read we have to assume he is not the same jesus.
>>18416135>The antichrist was assertive.>The antichrist was>WasWho do you believe was the antichrist anon? Obama?
>>18416136Im not telling you anything anymore
>>18416124No, because you will go to hell for your sin
>>18416141Which sin? Which hell?
>>18416151Every sin and the real hell.
>>18416153And where is this real hell located?
>>18416155Furthest from God
>>18416157Okay, well where is your God?
>>18416158Heaven and earth are full of His glory.
>>18416161I never saw any of his glory, but then I guess it's more of an intangible unprovable supernatural quality huh? Still you avoided the question. Where is he?
>>18416124I'm not a calvinist.
>>18416165>I never saw any of his gloryYou’ve never seen anything else>intangible unprovable supernatural quality huh?The Christian religion obviously rejects the presupposition that the only things which are real or knowable are articles of matter.>Where is he?Asked and answered.
