Spring breakers on Balboa Beach, California in 1947.
>>18419134Big. Nippon. Cock.
Wasn't swimwear just cotton at this time?
>>18419144yes. most artificial fibers other than nylon are 1950s onward inventions.
>>18419134imagine the smell. many baby boomers were conceived that day.
>>18419154
>>18419134How come they're all uggos? I thought this was le golden age?
>>18419134Balboa Beach still looks like that today, Newport is nothing but rich white people.
>>18419134Stupid granny hairdos.
>>18419363Anything can be fucked with a shot or two of liquor.
>>18419363no makeup
>>18419363Now you realize just how amazing Audrey Hepburn would have been
>>18419134those women are all dead now. that's kind of depressing.
>>18419363These two are pretty though.
>>18420339That's a man.
>>18420347Troons didn't exist in the 40s
>>18420347There were no trannies in the 1940s. This was also a time when biological women in pictures looked human before plastic surgery, piles of makeup, and AI filters existed.
>>18420357>>18420359Isnt there a part in catcher in the rye where the protagonist catches a tranny crossdressing in a hotel room?
>>18420372Don't know, haven't read it, but people who crossdress in private are a couple steps away from being troons.
>>18420359There were, I once saw a pic in a book of a transvestite being loaded into the back of a paddy wagon in NYC after the vice squad arrested him.
Ernest Hemingway's son was trans
>>18420403A transvestite is nothing more than a crossdresser. No men were taking hormones at that time. No men could even come close to passing as women. That other retard anon was implying these obviously biological women were men which would have been impossible at that time. Even today it's difficult for a tranny to pass as a biological women, the only ones who usually pull it off transition during puberty and even then a close look at their bone structure gives them away. Look up Emma Ellingsen, the most passing tranny I can think of it, you can still tell that this is just a beautiful femboy on hormones, and not an actual biological girl.
>>18420359>This was also a time when biological women in pictures looked human before plastic surgery, piles of makeup, andsay what? they had awful and really thick makeup in the 40s that looked like clown makeup due to the chemical composition of it.
>>18420436You don't understand anon, the concept of trannies and makeup didn't exist until the year 2000, everything before this was BASED and TRAD o algo
>>18420436The 40s-50s was already too late for that; it had been normalized since the 1920s for women to wear makeup, short skirts, go clubbing, etc. Women's magazines from the 50s were saying how it's ok to cheat sometimes.
The average aristocratic man in the 1700s and 1800s wore a thick coat of powder on their faces, makeup, and wigs on their heads. They were all makeup wearing trannies as far as I'm concerned.
>>18420433>unironically nitpicking distinctions between faggots who wear dresses and ladies underwearI think you might actually be a faggot.
>>18420359>before plastic surgeryBecause the technology was barely a few decades old.>piles of makeupThe 1950s was probably the most gaudy decade for women's makeup. Literally just caked on with bright red lipstick.>AI filters existed.Airbrushing and photo manipulation existed back then.
>>18420491Those are the distinctions. A crossdresser simply wears women's clothes. A transgender is a man chemically altering themselves, and sometimes using plastic surgery to look more like the opposite sex. Crossdressers have already existed while trannies are a recent phenomenon. If you think obvious biological women from the 1940s are men you are retarded.
>>18419363>How come they're all uggos?because you're a worthless incel
