Why did he spend all that time writing a preface to a sprawling, encyclopedic work? Did you read it? If so, what did you understand from it?
Read second preface to his Logic (don't remember which of the two), there he subtly disoarages the method in PoS—aka excessive repetition. But that even his Logic had some of this which is why he was working on a revision of it.Essentially the Encyclopedia is all you need then you can read PoS preface. And if you've read and understood PoS Preface then most of the PoS is superfluous masturbatory repetition.
>>18419739It’s all bullshit, Phenomenologies as a whole are just fairy tales no diffident from Bible or Quran. Read Quine, Frege or even Wittgenstein if you want to know some real philosophy
