[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images (15).jpg (9 KB, 299x168)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
Why didn't Hitler focus on people of color? Germany had colonies in Africa, he could just have sent his soldiers to execute poc. Also, why didn't Brits exterminate all Indians, Africans, and other poc?
>>
>>18420768
Namibia was lost after WWI and handed over to South Africa at that time. It became “North west South Africa.”
>>
>>18420768
>why wasn't Hitler some mindless redneck subhuman like me?
Because he was a German revanchist first and foremost. Blacks and other browns were a non-factor in his plans aside from a few exceptions like the Rhineland bastards.
>>
>>18420768
I don't know if you've ever heard of a historical event called World War I...
>>
>who are the Rhineland Bastards
>>
>>18420768
Look, Europeans used to travel far and wide to pick fights with distant people, but travelling is always a pain, you know? It's a lot easier just to pick a fight with your neighbours or your own countrymen.
>>
>>18420768
because it would be a waste of time spending your resources to execute africans who pose no threat to germany
he wanted to kill jews and slavs because he thought they were dangers to the german race

>Also, why didn't Brits exterminate all Indians, Africans, and other poc?
why would they do that? colonisation wasn't about killing people. it was about making use of resources and it's hard to do that if all the native workers are dead.

also they weren't as racist as hitler was.
>>
>>18420768
he wanted to but the *nglos cockblocked him by occupying german colonies so he had to direct his rightful fury onto the next thing which was sl*vs
>>
genocide is hard
>>
You have to be older than 18 to post here.
>>
>>18421081
>he thought they were dangers to the german race
He just wanted to clearly land colonialism style. Them being a threat is just rhetoric used to gloss up that fact.

>colonisation wasn't about killing people.
A big component of it is killing people.
>it was about making use of resources and it's hard to do that if all the native workers are dead
Colonialism eas never an efficient machine and there's been tons of retarded self destructive policies over the many centuries.
>also they weren't as racist as hitler was.
Hahahahahahahahahahaha. The only difference between Hitler and the other is.perial powers was that he was a little too close to them. Every other empire did equally as bad or often times worse shit while using even more dubious logic to justify it.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.