[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why has circumcision as a tradition developed independently in multiple ancient cultures and persisted for thousands of years, historically speaking?
>>
>>18421037
It's a relatively nonlethal but undeniably honest signal of tribal loyalty.
>>
>>18421037
It's a form of tribal scarification, usually to indicate masculinity, adulthood, or just tribal identity. Guys think about their cocks all the time so not surprising they'd get the idea to do something with it to establish some kind of symbolic meaning.

Good to note that most practices of circumcision worldwide weren't tight though, usually just the tip of the skin or a dorsal slit. Tight circumcisions, that we know to be specifically tight, come entirely from Jewish influence. Jews living among Greeks would stretch their remaining foreskin to restore it in order to fit in socially and access gymnasiums, so rabbis began requiring tight circumcisions to prevent this from being done.
>>
>>18421037
I don't believe non jews practiced it tbqh
>>
>>18421071
Egyptians did it before them
>>
File: IMG_0405.jpg (292 KB, 996x993)
292 KB
292 KB JPG
>>18421037
None of those cultures where European all of them where desert creeps . Zeus or Odin never had comendments about cutting your smekel.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.