TO WHAT ARE YOU REFERRING, SPECIFICALLY?

IF ALL THAT YOU MEAN IS «EVERYTHING», THEN, YOUR PRESSUMPTION IS FALSE.

>>18421834
>Why can't Christians agree on anything?
Because humans can't agree on anything

>>18421834
Christians agree Jesus Christ was the Son of God and that he was crucified and rose from the dead

>>18421834
Experience, and thus life, is objective? No, its subjective, thus there's a billion ways to think and understand, so basically, religions that are based on books and doctrines are understood different by each person. To put it into perspective, there's a billion Christians? Then there's one billion Christian religions. That is the problem with holy book religions.
As you may understand, the absence of feedback tends to color the mind with imagined feedback from coincidence, pareidolia, synchronicity, etc

>>18421834
It's all made up bullshit

>>18421834
Judge smol matters

You can focus on a few verses of the Bible to support just about any interpretation.

>>18421834
How many religions are fully united in belief? Jainism, Sikhism, and Bahai maybe? Though they could be very divided and I could just be ignorant regarding that division. But most religions as a whole are extremely divided. Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc. The more people there are in a religion (any group at all for that matter), the more likely some people will have disagreements and their own views.

>>18421840
You seethe about Protestants and Gnostics and brand them as heretics

>>18421834
>vague argument
it's not Jews and their tricks. It is Atheists and their tricks