There were at least eight English bibles before the KJV In 1611 The KJV was largely based on the Tyndale Bible before it. The KJV continued to be revised until 1769 so it wasn’t even complete in 1611 Upon what basis do you try to claim the KJV is somehow the divinely inspired and perfect English version?
>>18424284>The KJV continued to be revised The Enuma Elish, scribed on clay tablets 4000 years before the bible, has had no revisions.
>>18424303Based. Hail Marduk
The bible itself is false and incoherent
>>18424284>Upon what basis do you try to claim the KJV is somehow the divinely inspired and perfect English version?The basis for verification is the way jews attack it, trying to substitute in its place their perverse modern translations paired with their heretical dispensationalism fantasies.
>Upon what basis do you try to claim the KJV is somehow the divinely inspired and perfect English version?I grew up on the KJV
>>18424370euphoric
>>18424284It doesn't matter which translation, it is all the same old bullshit mythology at it's corehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zead6Zwy_U
>>18424284Enjoy hell
>>18424372Dispensationalism was literally invented by Cyrus Scofield who cited the KJV for his claims. The Scofield Bible is just an annotated KJV
>>18424484Oh I will enjoy hell very much
>>18424652It was invented by John Nelson Darby.
>>18424284KJV-onlyism is debunked by the material supplied with the original 1611 KJV. https://www.bible-researcher.com/kjvpref.html
>>18424652>Dispensationalism was literally invented by Cyrus ScofieldYou are a liar, like your father, a devil.
>>18424372>The basis for verification is the way jews attack itTranslation:>The basis for verification is the way [anyone] attack[s] it, [because whenever anyone attacks it I will assume they must be Jewish, so anything other than a pure absence of criticism is evidence of Jewish conspiracy against it and therefore also evidence of its perfection.]
