[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


No longer down for maintenance!

[Advertise on 4chan]


What were the cultural differences between Angle, Saxon, Jute (and Frisian) settlement and their low term impact on Britain?
>>
/his/ can't get a thread going about this kind of basic topic? I was legit interested in the opinions on this here.
t. not OP
>>
>>18425861
Jutes were specific and one of the northernmost migrations of Anglo-Saxons prior to the Vikings. Likely they were among the first on the isle because some Danish tribes were like small client states of Rome, and we have remains from them from closer to Caesar's time already in Britain that were more northern-shifted, with very little continental ancestry.
>>
>>18425854
>low term impact on Britain
>>
>>18425861
every one of those is wrong, are you retarded?
>>18426756
I wish I knew enough to say something of interest.
>>
>>18426756
you don't want that, unless you want this thread to be bumped by browns favelaposting
>>
>in line with evidence in northern Germany of settlements coming to sudden ends in the fifth or sixth centuries C.E. Researchers have proposed changing climate and pressure from other groups pushed people to migrate, and that the end of Roman control opened new opportunities in England.
Why would settlements there come to sudden ends? Pressure from neighboring tribes?

>Traces of western British and Irish ancestry in people buried on the continent suggest a reverse migration, too, with migrants’ descendants moving back after generations in Great Britain. “the North Sea was a highway, where people were coming and going"
>>
>>18426756
Brown people aren't interested in Anglo Saxon England. And honestly that good thing for (you)
>>
>>18425854
There's not much. All these groups were related by blood, laws and customs which is why they fused without much issues over time. It's rarely mentioned but there's also supposedly some Frisian settlement in England as well, but it's hard to recognise them as well.
>>
>>18426848
Yeah the North sea as a communication artery is something that isn't that often spoken of. Anglo-Saxons, Germans and the Scandinavians very obviously exchanged a lot of information between each other, so for instance the legends about Theodoric the Great and the Amalungs showed up in Anglo-Saxon England and Norway alike.
>>
>>18425854
Angles and Saxons were pretty similar, there was a greater cultural divide between the angles north and south of the Humber than the southern Angles and Saxons. With the north adopting far more Celtic traditions (though all did to some extent) and the Mercians being more connected with the other southern English. There was however a significant dialectical divide between the saxons and angles.
The jutes on the other hand appear to have had more in common with the Franks. Similar societial organisation, artifact designs, etc. some have suggested they were actually decented from franks and somehow got misidentified as being from Jutland. Others say they were just culturally influenced by the nearby franks.
>>
>>18428793
>With the north adopting far more Celtic traditions (though all did to some extent) and the Mercians being more connected with the other southern English
no proof of this
no such thing as celtic
>>
>>18426836
Bumpinho

>>18426853
I am, is one of my favorite topics
>>
>>18428248
>there's also supposedly some Frisian settlement in England as well, but it's hard to recognise them as well.
I'd expect so. Maybe some Franks as well?
>>
>>18426848
Climate change. The north sea has changed a bit in the past 2000 years.
>>
File: iu[1].png (3.64 MB, 2000x1225)
3.64 MB
3.64 MB PNG
>>18425854
Jutes: north Danish
Angles: south Danish
Saxons: north Germans who had been migrating west
>>
Jutes were a relatively small group that settled in Kent and mixed with the Saxons. Angles and Saxons were similar in size claiming large plots of land to which they give their names, East Anglia, Essex and Sussex. The Angles also settled Lindisware/Lincolnshire north of the fens, the fens being a massive swamp at the time.

This map shamelessly pulled from wikipedia is from a much later period after a 2nd migration.
>>
>>18425854
>>18426848
The Anglo-Saxon spread across Britain came in 3 phases. Saxons and other Germanic tribes had been raiding the coast through the 4th century along with Picts and Gaels and from 400-440 Romano-Briton collapsed under the strain and apparently large areas of the country became sparsely inhabited and the Angles, Jutes and Saxons moved into the agriculturally abundant southeast.

Various factors were at play explaining their success. Other Germanic tribes invading the Roman Empire at the time had potent military practices with their shield walls and adoption of new cavalry from the east. Climate change possibly weakened the Roman style latifundia, lowering populations and the size of armies and garrisons Romano-Britons. Of course it would also weaken the Germanic tribes, but perhaps less so due to their ad-hoc semi-nomadic slash and burn style agriculture, it may have also prompted them to make daring invasions in order to secure land for crops and prevent most of their own population dying in famine.

A 2nd phase occurred in the mid 6th century with Anglo-Saxons spreading out through England which seemed to be more of a conquest than a migration and resulted in Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms being completely Christianized by their new subjects. There was then a final phase where Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms secured more rugged western regions and parts of Scotland and Wales spanning the 6th century up to Strathclyde being dissolved by 1030, though in large part by the now extant and Celtic Scot Kingdom of Scotland.

During this time Angles and Saxons mixed and traded, there was of course further invasions by Danes and also Norwegians which injected Nordic culture again into Britain before the Norman invasion and medieval warm periods brought the Kingdom of England away from the north Sea into the Frankish continental world.
>>
>>18425854
Imagine literally being called angels

Cucked as fuck
>>
File: angel.png (368 KB, 959x821)
368 KB
368 KB PNG
>>18429507
you mean based, anglos are possessed of an otherworldly terrifying countenance
>>
my ancestors :)
>>
>>18428922
Genetically speaking, youre not related to the archaic Ingaevonic tribesmen who invaded the Iron age Roman province of Britain.
>>
>>18429513
>>
File: destruction of rome.jpg (486 KB, 1276x830)
486 KB
486 KB JPG
>>18426848
>Why would settlements there come to sudden ends?
>>
>>18429272
It has largely been proven genetically. https://youtube.com/watch?v=gDO-nSSuFSw

We wuz Alfred AND Charlemagne and Vikangz. All of them are just like me pretty much.
>>
>>18429306
also Frisians, the fourth and most ignored tribe.
>>
>>18425854
>Name the kingdom of Saxons to the south "South Sax"
>Name the kingdom of Saxons to the west "West Sax"
>Name the kingdom of Saxons to the east "East Sax"
>Name the kingdom of Angles to the east "East Angles"
Seriously? Are the writers even trying anymore this season?
>>
>>18431723
>Jutes come from Jutland
>Franks from Francia



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.