Are sexual fetishes inherently counter-revolutionary and reactionary?
I love this picture. Leftists have now become puritan pearl clutchers. This is beyond parody. Man I fucking LOVE this clown world
Both the people who made this image and those described in it deserve public corporal punishment
>>18426966>politics, history and lived experiences The right can play that game too.
>>18426999What's wrong with kinbaku?
>>18426966No, now fuck off.
>>18427233Why so angry?
>>18426966>traditional 1950's household play
>>18426966Both Christianity and leftism are puritan castrated dickless tranny faggots who hate being male.
>>18426966Which fetishes are not problematic?Is toonification communism-approved?
>>18426966Is fun inherently counter-revolutionary and reactionary?
>>18427286Rent free in your tranny atheist head
>>18427300>toonificationOh that's a funny one. Never heard about it.
>>18427334On your knees you filthy little christranny. Lick my shoes nice and clean faggot.
>>18427338It's the patrician's kink
>>18427342Why does her toon version have 20x bigger tits?
>>18426966Yes
>>18427351Cause it's fun
>>18427358>puritan chuds have the most degenerate and depraved fetishes
>>18427358>communists are just into sadism against women>everyone else is extremely degenerate in various ways
>>18427368>>18427365For me its yellow square
>>18427358>self reported paedophilia in the authright boxdefinitely accurate and organic surverying
>>18427382Epstein files my man
>>18427351Toon fetish artists usually draw it that way, probably because it's satisfying to see a flat titlet woman get huge gazongas upon getting tooned. But in some contexts I think it makes sense to draw toon titlets
>>18427420>HELP, HELP, I'M BEING TRANSFORMED FROM A BIG-BOOBED CARTOON TO A BIG-BOOBED CARTOON
>>18427430
>>18427358>incest >necrophilia >humiliation >latex >futa
>>18427456based mutt
>>18427384Exposed nazis like Bill Clinton
>>18427384Which showed that Epstein was a bog-standard resist lib and the only implication of Trump being a schizo FBI hotline caller? Those Epstein files?
>>18427358Seriously? All those "libertarians are pedos" jokes and pedophilia ends up on the authright square?
>>18427358>>18427365Anon, it says it was made by Aella, which if you had the misfortune of knowing who that is you'd know not to take that pic seriously.
>>18427358>all correlations were very small, though significant>max correlation was r=0.06Does this mouthbreather know what "significant" means? If your correlation is below r=0.1 it's guaranteed to be random noise.
>>18427334But Jesus commands it
>>18426993>nowHave you been in a box since the 19th-century?
>>18426966Yeah, if you cherry pick. Tell me more about how femdom is secretly fascist.
>>18426966>,,words"esl spotted opinion rejected
>>18427668It means the correlation is almost certainly present in the population and not just the sample. They're talking about statistical significance
>>18427816Yeah the p-value is statistically significant, the correlation itself is so weak that it's practically random. That chart is a bunch of noisy nonsense.
>>18427810lol good catch
>>18427340Weirdo
>>18427456Deserve every boot on your soil
The rot of the puritan mindset. Communists themselves have it, despite not being puritans; its an endless drive toward moral purism and utter offense at the idea that any body else would ever deign to live a life differently to your own personal code of ethics or desires. The tolerance of intolerance paradox; when encountering a puritan movement, whether it be social justice warriors, communism, conservative religious dogma, its better to mass kill them to keep liberty than let their authoritarian mental illness fester in the body politic. (yes, I'm aware of my hypocrisy).
>>18428108>mass kill people who want to limit consumption
>>18428129You might be the first communist to admit that you want to make the world overall poorer.
>>18428108>its better to mass kill them to keep liberty than let their authoritarian mental illness fester in the body politicWhat's wrong with authoritarianism?
>>18428201I know you imagine yourself as a party bureaucrat with power and connections, but the reality is that in any truly authoritarian system, you'd do all the boring, monotone things you do today, only you'd do them with less pay, and less ability to enjoy things in your private or personal life. Its just a net negative overall. The few positives it has are only really relevant in war time.
>>18428202I feel myself becoming more authoritarian when I interact with people and realize that their personal freedoms all bother me in some way.For example they will bog their face with botox and it looks ugly and depressing. Or they smoke cigarettes, which smells bad and is unhealthy. Or they'll have tattoos, which is trashy and ugly, etc.I think Queen Victoria got it more or less right with her puritanism. Just remove the christcuck nonsense.
>you believe moral restrictions like those that defined every single civilization before sexual liberation are necessary?>that's doing a heckin' bureaucracy, pal. bet you think you'll work at the politburo, huh? i'm very smart and insightful
>>18428202>your private or personal life.Which as we all know is all there is to society, There's no such thing as greater good, no such thing as sacrifices, only personal entitlements where consent is the highest ideal rather than purpose.
>>18427810care to explain why do you think 'ESL' is a problem?
>>18428222What gives the state the personal entitlement to strip away my rights? The state itself is just a collection of individuals. Sorry that I don't buy into your privilege horseshit, but authoritarianism isn't necessary for a healthy social body, and in many ways is actively deleterious toward it anyway.
When you think about it, chuds are alot like lazy malesubs in femdom spaces.They want to be dominated, but only on their terms and when they like it. They have little regard about what their dominant might be into. They also have very little respect or loyalty to their dominant themselves as a person. Only seeing them as a kink dispenser.Now replace "dominant" with "the state" and "domination" with whatever trad policies the chud believes in.I call this the femdom theory of authoritarianism.
>>18428258>What gives the state the personal entitlement to strip away my rightsThe social contract. >The state itself is just a collection of individualsWhich is the only thing keeping you from having to live like a wild animal, so you better care for its common good and not atomize it.>authoritarianism isn't necessary for a healthy social body, and in many ways is actively deleterious toward it anyway.The past century or so of sexual liberation has proven otherwise, neglecting moral restrictions is an act of societal suicide.>>18428262>They also have very little respect or loyalty to their dominant themselves as a personProjecting are we
>>18428270It's not projection to point out a widespread phenomenon.
>how your kink defines your politicsI dunno I just like having sex with my girlfriend simple as
>>18426999>deserve public corporal punishment>>18427228>What's wrong with kinbaku?deserve decapitationnoone (seems to have?) has a decapitation fetishor firing squad
>>18428339Schizopost
>>18427430Based?
>>18426966>This poster is not about kink shaming>But you should be ashamed of your kinks because I have decided that they are politically 'problematic'Even by their own standards leftists are hypocrites and terrible people.
>>18426966>kink-shaming is morally wrong!>but you should be ashamed of your kinks because, uhhh, because you're a chud!ok man.
>>18426993I hate leftists, but this isn't pearl-clutching or anti-sex/anti-kink in any way
>>18428623>YOUR KINKS ARE EVIL, SLAVERY ADJACENT, AND ONLY SERVE TO REEMPHASISE HISTORIC PATTERNS OF ABUSE AN OPPRESSION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111>Not anti-sex/anti-kink in any wayWhat did the leftist cultist mean by this?
>>18428486>>18428619>>18428628Wait! There's a way out!You can "deconstruct" your fetishes so they're no longer problematic
>>18428677Does that require a level of 'irony'? Or can I just flood the chat with word salad to justify my kinks?
>>18428623are you dense?
>>18427664It aligns perfectly with the conclusion he already wants to believe, so he will take it as fact and further his terminally online delusional complex. I almost pity the people that use the internet for serious things. Almost.
>>18427358>max correlation 0.06Wow, it's fucking nothing
someone posted this on /lgbt/ and it caused massive seething lmfao>>>/lgbt/43236297
>>18428262All right gang, let's see who this anon really is.>*pulls off rubber face*Michel Foucault?
