>Sarah told her husband Abraham to have a child with her brown maidservantUh...bros?? My catholic priest (who molested me btw) never told me there was cuckholdry in the Good Book????
>>18434230>brownKing James Bible:And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai.your attempts to retroactively insert hell-spawned demons into the definition of Israel are retarded and you are retarded
>>18434254>King James versionfake Bible
>>18434254How does your quote refute anything
>>18434230There is a lot of unhinged stuff in the good book if you actually read it.
>>18434230Sarah and Abraham were from Iraq so they were brown too
>>18434230Because Sarah was Aryan and nordic and a white supremacist?
>>18434510They were aryans from alabama you brownie.
>Immediately assuming her slave was black
>>18435666she was aliterally egyptian
>>18435742we wuz eyptians n shieeet
>>18434230That's not cuckoldry, that's using a slave for surrogacy and adoption. Also I think the authors of Genesis did not really approve of this practice, because they show how it creates domestic strife rather than harmony. It is Sarah's idea, yet when Abraham actually does it she becomes jealous and abuses her entirely innocent slave, to the point she is so distrought that she cannot endure her service anymore and runs away. Then later on she and Ishmael are quite despicably abandoned.
>>18435666No one said anything about blacks
>>18435815>That's not cuckoldry, that's using a slave for surrogacy and adoptionHe has sex with her, retard
>>18435815>the authors of GenesisMoses wrote Genesis
>>18435868He didn’t, Genesis was at best written during the Persian period and no earlier than that. The Tower of Babel was a polemic against Babylon and only makes sense in the context of the Babylonian exile.
>>18435874>He didn’tProof ?>Genesis was at best written during the Persian period and no earlier than thatIt was written in 1513 BCE>The Tower of Babel was a polemic against Babylon and only makes sense in the context of the Babylonian exile.It was a historical event
>>18435877Genesis plagiarized the Enuma Elish. Proof? Read the Enuma Elish.
>>18435905No, the enuma elish and Genesis are both based on a historical eventThe difference is that Genesis is divinely inspired
>>18435905I don't think you know what plagiarism is.
>>18435862she was his property and it was done with his wife's consent to acquire a child. It was slave surrogacy/concubinage. That's not the same thing as cuckoldry, which requires deception or a breaking of trust.
>>18436760No, cuckoldry overwhelmingly takes place with the man's agreement or even on his insistence to a hesitant wife, that's why it's called the cuck chair, because he willingly watches from his chair and enjoys doing so
