[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.18434830
No.18434830 Archived
why didn't the United States develop into confederations like Europe did after the fall of Rome? it would be cool to see how different early nationalities would have made different principalities based on ethno-cultural grounds.
>inb4 the civil war
not what I'm talking about
>inb4 the articles of confederation
also not what I'm talking about
>>
Anonymous
 No.18434837
No.18434837
>>18434830
>inb4 obvious reason
>inb4 another obvious reason
/thread, I guess. Good job, OP.
>>
Anonymous
 No.18434876
No.18434876
>>18434837
These reasons aren't obvious, dipshit. I'm talking about prior to revolution.
>>
Anonymous
 No.18435068
No.18435068
>>18434830
Because technology was developed enough to allow a central government to forcefully unite disperate groups. The civil war proved that any state that wants independence will be crushed. Pre civil war any ideas of independence will be smothered by economic pressures.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.