why is when you have a country dedicated to the plurality of perspectives in terms of what can be deduced versus what cannot, why do history departments in these particular countries have only accepted narrative of history and others are verboten? before you shoot the messenger I live in the US midwest.
>>18436805English America was best America
>>18436805You godda have a narative to sell to people. Doesn't matter what you are where you came from, you pledge allegiance to the flag and we can all live happily ever after
freedom is impossible for any nation in history except america and even then its slowly corroding and turning into over violence. gangs now rule formerly white cities. more mexicans more gangs your freedom is disappearing lasted for about 250 years good luck next time. and europe will be consumed literally by muslims and terrorists.
Probably because you're an uneducated retard trying to argue something stupid. History academia is full of arguements and debates over all sorts of things. Ask three different historians the same question and you're liable to get three different answers. This doesn't mean they'll entertain you're theories that the moon is made of cheese
>>18436805>why do history departments in these particular countries have only accepted narrative of history and others are verboten?History is disturbing and whatever ideology or historical LARP regime you're into probably did some disastrous things, and the point is to face up to that and work through it rather than trying to renarrate it. That's true even if there was a rational core of what Adolf Stalingruber was trying to do in his own time.>>18436851>gangs now rule formerly white cities ... europe will be consumed literally by muslims and terrorists.Homicides in the U.S. are at 1950s levels right now, man. People don't go outside, they're all watching Netflix, and the Muslim world in the future will be wracked by nihilistic anime femboy revolutions.
>>18436894probably because theyre taking all the guns including the gang bangers guns so. who cares though racial replacement will utterly destroy any trace of white culture still alive duh no guns hahahaha noooo fuck we acted too slow welp lets watch netflix lobotomized complete.
>>18436894>>18436854Not necessarily. What I'm trying to say is that in order for a nation to exist, there has to a common thread uniting all of it, when that thread actively works against the nation's best interests it tends to unravel pretty quickly. If you have a nation built on an a priori democratic framework, the narrative will fall apart if there's not at least a basic consensus that unites each position. Regardless, this can either justify horrible human rights abuses or even racism (regardless of where it comes from) or even ideas that are meant to undermine the core founding stock population or any other stocks of people. What I'm trying to say is that certain political and philosophical doctrines are capable of unraveling narratives and some are culpable of uniting them. This isn't a conservative/liberal or left/right dichotomy either. Liberal epistemology can undermine any proposal by its ontological existence.
>>18437845Liberal/democratic epistemology is only tangibly related to political liberal democracy and the starting point of coming to those conclusions. Although it does not necessarily predicate the teleological direction of such inquiry. Thats how so-called liberal democracy can eventually produce demagogues through the course of history. Now, I'm just assuming here, but I'm somewhat certain that related theories were made by Amaury De Reincourt in books like The Coming Caesars.
