[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Should constitutions entrench cultural matters to mold the behavioral framework of the people?
>>
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS «CULTURE»; THERE ARE MORALS.

A POLITICAL CONSTITUTION SHOULD HAVE A MORAL BASIS; THAT IS THE ENTIRE PURPOSE OF POLITICS: TO MANAGE MORALITY IN THE PUBLIC AMBIT, AND TO FORM THE SUBJECTS OF THE POLITY IN ACCORDANCE TO CERTAINS MORALS.
>>
>>18437646
I dunno but does this honey have nudes?
>>
If you can't mold the constitution, the behavioral framework must not be that good. In the modern age, executing the world's centuries-long industrialization project is the first priority; constitutions should be subject to practical concerns, which constrain behavior in a way that facilitates future learning, to be more sure about behavioral questions. Permanent dictatorship is the nightmare, whereas a decent civilization has license to think and uses adaptation to survive. Ideally, freedom is about novelty and creativity. It is effective at what it pursues. It hastens the settlement toward the possibility of an intellectual end-state of morality.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.