[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images(2).jpg (56 KB, 489x626)
56 KB JPG
Why didnt the botton % of males just unionize and kill of the top 20% of males historicaly speaking?
>>
you seem to be bottom percent of men if you know what i mean hanahanana
>>
File: IMG_6324.jpg (671 KB, 1170x1252)
671 KB JPG
>>18438634
Because most of the world’s men arent pathetic, envious marxists?
>>
>>18438634
Because they're the bottom for a reason.
>>
>>18438634
Because Marx was wrong when he argued that they only have their chains to lose. No, they have their families, livelihoods, homes and religions to lose. The working class as it exists (not the Marxist idealized "proletariat") is not some entity that can ignore all of that and throw men, women and children, themselves, into gunfire for the vague hope of "overthrowing bourgeois oppression" or whatever. The majority of them want to live a quiet life and practice their culture and religion, two ideas Marxists spit at.
>>
>>18439260
>families, livelihoods, homes and religions
Four things modern young, able bodied men no longer have
>>
>>18439260
No it's simpler than that marx didn't understand that most people don't actually want to die for their causes and it has always just been a minority that did.
>>
>>18438634
Because bottom 20% believe they are also part of the top 20%.
>>
>>18438634
Pol Pot was strongly opposed to adultery, insofar is he basically arranged mass marriages for unmarried men. I think he is quite overhated and this is one of the reasons.
>>
It's inherited goyimhood. During the bronze age throughout the early modern period. Mass insurgencies were practically impossible. Because centralized states had a severe military advantage.

Even if you gather up all your local villagers and gather up a horde of 10,000 or 30,000. An expriced well supplied military of just 1 or 2 thousand could Plausibly rout&destroy you.

So population groups that regularly challenged organization states got culled presumably.

The crazy thing is that modern states quite possibly no longer have ANY real military advantage over a Rebellious civilian population. Tanks, artillery, jets all require complex industry to produce in even small amounts, meanwhile human waves, drones ak47s and c4 land mines are dirt cheap.


Once the Civil War in a modern country gains momentum its impossible to stop unless the insurgents just agree to stop fighting, assuming they have access to even just basic cheap small arms.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.