[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Paul.jpg (57 KB, 500x683)
57 KB JPG
"Muslims" have been cutting their dicks because they decided to believe scholars and their Hadith instead of believing in the Quran (the Word of God).
God gave no such command for them to cut their dicks.

The Christians got it right. Paul the Apostle explains that the "true" covenant sign is no longer physical. It is inner transformation, sometimes called "circumcision of the heart."
>>
>>18439210
Circumcision is a ritual prominent since at least ancient Egypt that has health benefits in those regions. Jews claiming it as a sign of superiority is retarded and is why Islam doesn't work outside of MENA.
>>
but the quran says to listen to the prophet, and he says you should circumcise
>>
>>18439287
No, scholars claim he said that. That's different.
>>
i met a quranist in saudi arabia who said cutting the dick off is against the quran which says dont mutilate or disregard the body.
>>
File: compromise.png (747 KB, 962x767)
747 KB PNG
>>18439210
>Any uncircumcised male, who has not been circumcised IN THE FLESH, will be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant. - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2017&version=NIV
Also read where it says it is an everlasting covenant. Why should I trust Paul over actual apostles like James? In fact why should I trust him when he actually does it himself to other men.
>>
>>18439827
Why should you trust the Old Testament if it is known that the "God" in it is actually a projection men made? Haven't you notice that this "God" in the Old Testament has human flaws?

God has no flaws. The Old Testament is rigged.
>>
>>18439827
>Also read where it says it is an everlasting covenant.
"Everlasting" is stronger than the actual Hebrew word here. It essentially means "that which is or will be ancient". In Genesis 49:26 for example it's used of the hills, as can be seen here: https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gen/49/26/t_conc_49026 and in Genesis 6:4 it's used of the Nephilim as can be seen here: https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/gen/6/4/t_conc_6004 despite the fact that the Nephilim in question prior to the Flood were of course destroyed by the Flood, im Joshua 24:2 it's translated as "since ancient times" as can be seen here: https://www.blueletterbible.org/niv/jos/24/2/t_conc_211002

It can refer to things that won't end, but doesn't do so automatically; "everlasting" is a stronger word in English than this word is in Hebrew. It most certainly doesn't mean something will not end.
>>
File: 20260221_233127.jpg (33 KB, 559x447)
33 KB JPG
>>18439210
>"circumcision of the heart."
I don't like this word because jewish rabbinical circumcision became baby torture 100 years after Jesus death. Circumcision used to be less radical than it is now, now they skin the entire dick and exported this blood ritual to the west.

So I like the expression "re-adjustment of the heart" more.
>>
>>18441333
Yes. The very word is tainted in this day and age.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.