>>18439439He was based for genociding Kalmyk mongs out of Europe
>>18439439Depends, are you a communist? No because believe it or not he did everything in his power to ruin communism, the USSR under him was strong enough at a couple points in time to liberate all of Europe successfully. He preferred cooperating with capitalists every chance he got. He even gifted mantions to his friends. Once you learn that you realize he is a bastard that didn't deserve to inherit the Soviet Union. Lenin himself said so.Based for Russia? Yes, even as a Georgian he is the person who set up Russia specifically inside the Union to be the strongest member even during the war. Some Russian infantrymen died, yes, but the vast majority of deaths were ukrainian, Siberian, Caucasus people, faux poles (Belarussians), etc. unironically white Russians died the least out of all the people in the Union. If not for him, the Soviet Union and Russia would have been a took for true internationalists like Trotsky.Is he a based man in a vacuum? Yes, absolutely. Almost no men in history would be able to do what he did if they were dropped into his shoes in his teens. Napoleon, Caesar, Hitler, George Washington. Not a single one of them could have achieved even a single thing Stalin achieved if they were dropped into his shoes and facing the same circumstances. But one can easily imagine Stalin successfully filling the shoes of other great men.Tl;dr he is not based when it comes to communism. But he is based as a great leader, in the 1% of the 1% of great men.
>>18439450Holols and Polacks too
>>18439459>dying while peeing his pantHe wasn't exactly great.
>>18439450>t. pimp slaphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdzlGeIVJQg
Based on what?
>>18439462And a ton of pidorashkas, gruzin power.
>>18439439He had some based moments
>>18439468Based nvke!
>>18439468Everyone shits and pisses themselves when they die. Especially as old as he was.
