Contrary to what you read online that opposition to Shia-Sunni unity is just a Wahhabi phenomenon, we see clear examples of this not being the case every single day even in Western cities that are filled with non-Wahhabi Muslim immigrants.There are next to no Gulf Arab "Wahhabis" in the West.Generally speaking Syrians, Algerians, Pakis, Afghans, Bangladeshi, Somalis, Iraqi Sunnis, Moroccans, Libyans, Black Africans, Yemeni Sunnis, and Turks are not "Wahhabis". Even though you may get Wahhabis among them, by and large they are Hanafi, Maliki or Shafi'i.And yet anywhere you find a population of such Muslims they do NOT mix with Shi'ites and see Shi'ites as odd and weird unusual people.How common is it to find a Paki or a Sudanese Muslim married to a Shi'ite? How common is it to find a Nafri who has Shi'ite relatives or friends? These things don't happen.In reality, it's far from just the Wahhabis/Salafis who hate Shi'ites and distance themselves from them. It's not just the Wahhabis who hate Iran.That doesn't mean all these Sunni Muslims want to slaughter the Shi'ites or harm them. Some may even see them as fellow Muslims, but they do NOT mix with them or marry into their families or have them around their children. They do not pray with them. Shi'ites are seen as like a weird cult and a bunch of strange people, especially for their views concerning the companions.Try it out for yourself, go to Tower Hamlets in London or Small Heath in Birmingham. There are no Iran flags and nobody mixes with the Shi'ites. Even pro-Palestine Sunnis are very suspicious of Shi'ites and Iran.So how can you state that this is only a Wahhabi political move to keep your distance from Shia?
>>18441089>"Should we momentarily look over our differences to form a united front for causes that both of us wish to support and agree are good?">"NO! Wabashallah you will taste my shoe!"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TnRfYtv-2E
>>18441089The unity amongst the sons of God is natural. Resistance to this unity is the works of the ego.
>>18441089K
>>18441089How many times are you going to post this duplicate thread?
>>18441105By that logic muslims might as well ally with israel since both of us hate iran
>>18441089It isn't. Sunnis are the biomass of the Middle East and the only ones with braincells are the Shia. Iran are finally winning against the US when it told the Sunni Arabs to go fuck themselves.
>>18441422You watched too many ai tiktok videos, reality is that the bombings have caused hundreds of billions worth of damage in Iran which they wont be able to rebuild at least in the next 100 years and their economy is collapsing
>>18441089>Saaar you have to hate Shias and Iran please saarrrWhy do you have to make the same thread every single day?
>>18441426Yes, and Iran has caused even more damage to the US and has shown just how much they can destroy the world economy. Oil prices are not going back down in our life times.
>>18441434>and Iran has caused even more damage to the USNot really, but either way the US has the ability to recover while Iran doesn't.
Yet another Iran thread from the Birmingham jeet. Once a day, right on schedule
>>18441089I don’t get why Shias like Sunnis so much (see Iranian simping for Palestine, Qutb, etc.). It is the saddest one-way relationship in history
>>18441427Who's saying YOU have to hate them? I'm simply giving you the reality on the ground. Most of those who are online like Haqiqatjou who are affirming that anti-Shia views are strictly a Wahhabi propaganda position are severely misinformed or being purposely dim.The average Muslim immigrant living in the UK, Germany, France, Netherlands, Denmark, etc are NOT Wahhabis. They are nominal Sunnis from a Hanafi, Maliki or Shafi'i background. They are NOT Gulf Arab "Wahhabis" from UAE or Saudi.But yet for them the Shia are complete oddballs who they don't associate with or mix with, let alone marry and cooperate with.This does not mean that all these Sunni Muslim diasporas want to massacre Shi'ites or even that they view them all as non-Muslims, they are simply seen as people that don't really have anything to do with the Muslim community. It's a bit like seeing a Somali man marrying a Christian woman or a Nafri man marrying a Jew woman. Sure it's permissible for them but how often does it ever happen? Sunnis mix and marry and mingle with other Sunnis, with Shi'ites being seen as oddball aliens with nothing in common.If Shia-Sunni unity was natural as Haqiqatjou and co make out then we would see a Paki Sunni or a Libyan Sunni or an Egyptian Sunni marrying his daughter off to an Iranian Shi'ite without a second thought but this will never happen.
unity with Iran?
>>18441418sunnis have allied with israel. I'm not really sure why. I will never understand why you hate Iranians more than you hate jews. But you clearly do and are willing to enslave yourselves to israel.
>>18441521Saaar I'm just giving you the reality on the ground saaar
>>18441530I hate Iranians more than Israel since as a Sunni Arab they hate me and my people and they make it clear every day, both pro-regime and anti-regime Pahlavist Iranians. All of them are the same and the hatred they have is 10x that which the Jews have. So why wouldn't i hate them back? People who want to eradicate me and my people and i'm supposed to say "oh never mind let's unite with them"? For all their hatred and vileness the Jews are at least our Semitic cousins we can coexist with them once the vile magians are out of the picture. Once we annex Ahwaz to Iraq and shift the Sunni regions in the South to Pakistan/Balochistan the rest of Iran can go up in flames. If it is the Jews that do it I won't be dancing for joy with them but i won't be crying for the Iranians either. Both can be destroyed. Both are cancers in the Middle East but the Jews are redeemable but must be weakened.
>>18441568Whatever, jeet
>>18441530All good things about Iranian Shia politics are based on the fact that they're Persian, with Persian ingenuity, moral clarity, strong national identity, strong sense of right and wrong, self reliance and endurance. It is no wonder that Islamic golden age happened when Persians were under the helm.Iranian homegrown nuclear program, build in defense of themselves and wider Muslim world is more honorable and righteous than whatever gaudy infrastructure projects gulf Sunni Arab sheikhs build using western architects, Indian slaves, and petrodollar money bribes while ignoring the suffering of their fellow Arabs (including Christians like Lebanese) and Muslim brothers in the north.Remember when they said, "a whole civilization will die tonight", they understand that the target isn't merely "the regime" It's the strength and power of Shia Persian civilization that has rooted itself in Iran since at least 500 years since Safavid dynasty.They want either Iran reduced to rubble or westernized to the point the civilizational spirit no longer exists, and it just be another globohomo puppet pawn of the west.Next after Iran, ex-Israeli PM explicitly said the next target is Turkey, which is understandable because they're independent and have their own civilizational power, but not any Arab countries since they're already subdued, this is how pathetic the situation has become.
>>18441568shabbos goyed again award
>>18441089You're a paki that lives in birmingham, OP, the cursed genetics from a century of inbreeding are a greater existential threat to your community than whatever the iranians are getting up to
Why are the Shia's the only group currently backing Palestine?Hamas are sunni no?
>>18441656From I can see from threads like this, Sunnis are basically the Islam equivalent of Evangelical Protestant. Very pro-Israel and America, and strongly against Shias for the crime of fighting them
>>18441089Actual differences between Muslims are not at the level of Sunni and Shia. It is at the level of aqidah such as Twelver, Ashari, Athari, Maiturdi and so on. This was politically important and was used as a reason to enslave and kill each other. This is ignoring things like caste such as found in biraderi and the practice asharaf, pretending to be from a foreign area or have descent from a foreign culture. Really basic questions such as who has the legitimate authority to lead the Muslim community after the Prophet Muhammad? It also connected to theological and ritual differences such as whether Allah really had 2 right hands and shins like Athari Muslims claim and whether Wali or Islamic saints could be praised, which ones and how. The following difference also intersected with madhab or legal school but often legal school was imposed.
>>18441089Historically, the idea of Shia and Sunni as unified blocks reflected later political , specifically national developments and that these religions tended to be enforced top down. Islam now a days is a lot more homogenous than historically and often was more tribal in organization with variant texts and practices with some tribes having different authotiries to do things in the religion. Modernization for example saw a narrowing of Koran standardization that built on the various oirat variants. Historically, there were more and there are variants in meaning. However, standardization lead to the belief that they are roughly the same. This search for standardization often involved a top down approach to enforcing the religion and focus on political institutions on this task. For example, The Cairo edition, or the King Fu'ād Quran or the Azhar Quran, is relatively recent, it was published in July 10, 1924.
>>18441905>whether Allah really had 2 right hands and shinsThere are Muslims who think God has a physical form?
>>18441656>Why are the Shia's the only group currently backing Palestine?Shias being the minority group know they have no chance of displacing Sunnism, but that they will be at least somewhat better-off if Islam as a whole achieves more global victories and exerts cultural influence over more countries.Same reason why Iran runs propaganda for Pakistani/Arab-aligned Muslim and leftist causes in countries like the UK despite the fact that Islamic immigrants in Europe are swaying towards salafi fundamentalism which despises Shias.
>>18441994Yes, very few Muslims actually know it. In Atharī theology, specific hadith are affirmed exactly as they appear, without asking how (bi-lā kayf) and without likening Allah to creation. For example, in Sahih Muslim (Book of Qadar), the Prophet ﷺ said: “Allah created Adam with His two hands, and both of His hands are right” (also reported with similar wording in Musnad Ahmad). Another well-known narration in Sahih al-Bukhari (Book of Tafsir, on Qur’an 68:42) and Sahih Muslim states: “Our Lord will uncover His shin, and every believer will prostrate to Him…”, which Atharīs affirm as a real attribute befitting Allah’s majesty, without interpreting it metaphorically or imagining a physical limb. It is God's limb and he has one but it is not a limb like yours. In contrast, Ashʿarī scholars accept these same hadith as authentic but interpret them to avoid any bodily implication: Ashʿarīs adopt tafwīḍ, affirming the wording while leaving the exact meaning to Allah. They basically, say it says he has limbs and has limbs but what that means does not refer to limbs as you know of them. They are not Godily limbs in their perspective. Debates about Allah's face and the color of his clothes are very prominent in this intersectarian debate.
Here are some examples of these. These are prominently in Sunni materials but they also appear in Shia materials. These are all considered authenticated by the way.“Allah created Adam in His image, sixty cubits tall. When He created him, He said to him: ‘Go and greet that group of angels…’”Source: Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 6227.“Allah created Adam in His image, his height being sixty cubits…”Source: Sahih Muslim, no. 2841.“Our Lord will come to them in a form other than the one they saw the first time, and He will say: ‘I am your Lord.’ They will say: ‘We seek refuge in Allah from you…’ Then He will come to them in the form they recognize…”Source: Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 7439.“Our Lord will uncover His shin, and every believer, male and female, will prostrate before Him…”Source: Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 4919.“…Then the shin will be uncovered, and every believer will prostrate before Him…”Source: Sahih Muslim, no. 183.
“The hearts of the children of Adam are between two fingers of the Most Merciful, as one heart; He turns them wherever He wills.”Source: Sahih Muslim, no. 2654.“Allah created Adam with His Hand…”Source: Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 7418.“Those who are just will be seated upon pulpits of light… at the right hand of the Most Merciful—and both His hands are right hands…”Source: Sahih Muslim, no. 1827.“Hell will continue to say, ‘Are there any more?’ until the Lord of Glory places His foot over it…”Source: Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 6661.“There will be none among you but his Lord will speak to him directly, without an interpreter…”Source: Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 7443.That one above is interesting because it is connected to the debate of whether Allah will only speak Arabic to people,
>>18441427there is an ongoing damage control campaign. Expect more forced poasts shilling Wahhabism on /his/, in the coming days, counter-signaling recent buzz done surrounding the matter.
All existent Shia aqidah hold that Athari and Ashari Aqidah are polytheistic. Shia theology argues that God’s attributes are identical to His essence, so there is no real multiplicity within God. They critique Ashʿarī and Atharī views for affirming distinct, eternal attributes, which they see as introducing multiple eternal realities alongside God. From this perspective, such multiplicity risks compromising pure tawḥīd, and is therefore philosophically compared to a form of shirk. Athari and Ashari claim that denying real, distinct attributes in order to preserve unity can go too far and involves rejecting the Koran such as denying that Allah has a specific throne that will be carried by angels.Such as in the example below. Athari critique Ashari as well on the grounds that ascribing attributes as unknowable does violence to the Koran while Ashari will argue that they are anthropomorphizing Allah and heretical. Not as bad as Shia though for many other theological reasons.Those who bear the Throne, and all who are round about it, hymn the praises of their Lord [...]Quran 40:7Then on that Day, the Resurrection will occur, And the heaven will split [open], for that Day it is infirm. And the angels are at its edges. And there will bear the Throne of your Lord above them, that Day, eight [of them].Quran 69:15-17
Māturīdī are often critiqued from multiple directions because it allows for the use of philosophy. Ashʿarīs argue that it gives too much authority to human reason, especially in moral knowledge, while Atharīs criticize it for relying on philosophical theology (kalām) and reinterpreting some divine attributes instead of affirming them as they appear in scripture. Both of these are seen as introducing shirk and this gets more critical becuase of their view of saints. From a Shia perspective, Māturīdīs, like Ashʿarīs, are seen as not preserving absolute divine unity strictly enough, since they affirm real, eternal attributes distinct from God’s essence, which could imply a kind of multiplicity. Famously, they are seen as more polytheistic than Christianity in their theology. Each attribute having it's own nature but also accessible through reason makes it similiar to something like Hellenistic paganism from their view. It is sometimes seen as honest version of the Ashari.
>>18441089>unity is le bad, akhi.. b-b-bcz it just is! a-anyway here is some Lefty-lengthed Gulf-sponsored walls of textslop and manipulation-by-omission quotations to spread FUD and trick the gulliblewere immune to your propaganda jeetOP is a Wahhabifaggoy
All Sunni as a whole see the general Shia view of imamate as heretical at best or polytheism at worst. From a Sunni perspective, both Twelver and Sevener (Ismāʿīlī) doctrines of the Imamate are critiqued for elevating the Imams to a level seen as lacking clear basis in the Qur’an, Sirah and Hadith. Sunnis argue that claims of divinely designated, infallible (maʿṣūm) Imams go beyond what is religiously warranted, and that leadership after the Prophet should be determined by the community (shūrā), not by hereditary designation (naṣṣ). They also question the historical continuity and evidence for specific lineages of the Imams, Islam holds that texts must be read literally and seen as eternally unchanging, and see no such evidence of this being maintained in the texts of the Imams. They are especially critical of Twelvers for the doctrine of occultation especially and seeing it as polytheism and magic. The absolute authority of the Imams is seen as going aganist the Seal of the Prophets and the argument is that Shia Madhabs are inherently violative of it. Even Sunni aqida who do have the concept of saints hold that the Shia view of saints is polytheistic.
>>18442318An interesting philosophical detail out of all of this is that philosophicallly speaking the Trinity has analogically attributes in Latin Christianity while in Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Christianity, the attributes are negative; this ironically means that both are simpler metaphysically speaking, than either Sunni or Shia models of God. Reformed Judaism would be even more so and in a sense could be more monotheistic if you think in terms of simplicity, in so far as we think of simple substances. Some types of Orthodox Judaism are somewhat close to Ashari and Māturīdī in their view of attributes but this is because they all tapped into the same Greek philosophical resources.
>/his/>looks inside>sudden daily newsletter-sized ramblings about shia polytheism>new forced meme on the 'log just in time when Iran is under War>sudden cozying-up of takfiris to using BBS pornographic forums on the webz>daily werk-tier amount of time dedicated to preaching on 4chud>prooving how kikes theologically/technically better than shia>counter-signaling every single enemy of one exact Middle Eastern "country" with auto-generated "reasons">0 peeps about "sunni" lands establishing actual Shiva penis-worshiping jeet hindushrinessus
>>18442303OP is a well-known autistic shitposter on this board. He has some kind of tard rage relating to Shias and Iran and can't shut up about them. Even if there is a damage control campaign, that's not why OP posts these threads every day
>>18442339In dawahtard/brumpaki's defence he's been seething about them for years now
>>18442345this anon is prolly different. analyze the way he writes, and contrast it with other text walls on this thread, or earlier older ones. to me it sounds very different. i genuinely suspect this is anon is arab and not a paki
>>18441568Iranians do more to support sunni Palestinians than the entire rest of the sunni world combined. They are seemingly the only muslims that actually believe in all that ummah business. The rest of you happily stab one another in the back for jew gibs.
>>18442358It's literally the same autistic structure every time with this anon.>If X is true, then why do some people believe Y?>Bangladeshis, Pakis, Yemenis, and 10 other nationalities believe Y!>So how can X be true!
>>18442366>The rest of you happily stab one another in the back for jew gibs.trvkei mean posts in this thread literally make arguments on how "israel and jews are cousins, family and more loved than iran and its twelver sects to a Sunni"
>>18442358As the other anon said it's the same shit he's been posting about for years nowhttps://desuarchive.org/his/thread/16781863/I'm guessing he's just embarrassed that (Shia) Iran seems to have ended up the final boss against the Great Satan, and not his based Sunni co-religionists
>>18442303>>18442339You don't need a campaign when autistic jeets exist. OP does his daily posts because he needs to sperg out somewhere, and /his/ is the board he has chosen to spam on a daily basis
>>18442366How can the Iranians be Muslim when they never mention Allah? They call out to Hussain and Fatima, so how is this any different than a Christian calling out to Jesus? It isn't.Even if we accept your feeble point that the Iranians are doing more for Palestine, how does that change their status as non-Muslims? Ireland does a lot to raise awareness, should we start calling Ireland part of the Ummah? You do understand that Palestine is not the religion of Muslims, right? You do understand Islamic belief is not the Palestine issue? That's not the criteria.Are there Muslims in Iran? Of course. But there are also Muslims in Britain, France and Ethiopia. Are they Muslim nations now?
>>18442495So standing up for your oppressed coreligionists during a genocide is not a criteria of Islamic belief for Sunnis, but it is for Shias? No wonder Shias are so based
>>18442547Not only Shias, even Christians and seculars have been doing what they can. But Sunnis just have some kind of cruel apathy towards Palestinians. The Palestinians are just an obstacle to securing closer ties with Israel
>>18442697>But Sunnis just have some kind of cruel apathy towards Palestinians.>Egypt enforces the Gaza famine by blockading Gaza from their side of the border>Syria has a security agreement with Israel to work together against Palestinian militant groups>Turkey operates the gas pipeline that Israel depends on for energy>Gulf Arab countries have public ties with Israel, including military and intelligence tiesIt's much, much worse than apathy. These countries could have stopped the genocide if they wanted, but their ties to Israel are more important. As OP said, genocide of fellow Sunnis next door doesn't have any religious significance, it's totally alright to ally with Israel against Palestinians
>>18442366Arab countries send billions in aid to Palestine each year, you don't hear much about it because its genuine and not just for updoots like Iran nor is it done to advance their own agenda. It's obvious that Iran's ''support'' is two-faced and pretentious because Palestine is the only Arab and Muslim country they supposedly care about, how come there wasn't this sympathy towards the Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen or Lebanon which were killed in much larger numbers by their terrorist militias collaborating with America? Well obviously because the latter was an obstacle to their regional project.
>>18442914Yeah saar Iran is totally getting bombed into the stone age by US/Israel for updoots. Arabs don't send shit Hamas, they just send billions to Israel and some money to Israel backed groups
>>18442918Iran is getting bombed because it bit the hand that fed them and helped them spread like a cancer to Arab nations. And because they outlived their usefulness anyways
>>18442933Yeah the US was totally feeding them by placing them under embargo for 47 years. India really aren't sending their best jeets to London are they?
>>18441568The jews are raping and killing sunni arabs in Palestine for decades and the only ones to really step up in their defense are the shia Hezbollah and shia Iran. You sunnis are pathetics and deserve to become goyslaves. Thankfully for you Iranians don't think that and are actually doing something.
>>18442945Saar im pure white aryan and fight against the great satan except when they sell me weapons to fight saddam saar
>>18442965Yeah Iran traded American hostages for weapons, Saddam was getting them from free. Nice try jeet, look up some basic history next time
>>18442964please refer to>>18442914
>>18442971please do not redeem and please refer to >>18442780
>>18441597This is a delusional take. The Gulf Arab states are the most advanced civilization in human history. Saudis, Qataris, and Emiratis live in unimaginable luxury, the best lifestyles on Earth. There is no internal dissent/tension in these nations, and they (especially Saudi and Qatar) have spread their ideology globally. I don’t know how you could be more successful than them, as a country. They blow Iran out of the water.
>>18442969No they didn't lmao, nice alt history to cope with collaborating with the great satan you made up though
>>18442981Lmao did you not learn that part of the Iran-Contra scandal? Why do you think it was such a big scandal in the US? This is embarrassing for you that you didn't know that haha
>>18442978Who sends more aid to Palestine, GCC or Iran?
>>18441518I don't get it either. Iran, for the first time ever, has a good reputation and standings against the US solely because they stopped giving a fuck about Sunnis and focused on their own. Even protecting Lebanon was for the Shias.
>>18442990It would've been too controversial to admit iran was an israeli puppet, so instead they made up this to rationalize sending arms to an ''enemy''. If they really wanted to they could've just helped Iraq overthrew the regime
>>18442992GCC except Qatar does not support Hamas, Iran actually sends financial and military aid. Whatever the GCC sends is sent to Israel, which decides how to administer it. In contrast Iran supports Hamas and PIJ, groups actually involved in fighting Israel. Next question?
>>18442997Hahaha a moment ago you didn't even know about the arms-for-hostages deal, but it only took you a second to come up with this conspiracy theory with no evidence. Great work, amazing coping skills
>>18442993Iran doesn't give a shit about anyone but themselves see>>18442914
>>18443008The Iranian government has spent the last 50 years picking fights with the US and Israel with zero gain for their own country. They are retarded for supporting Palestine at their own expense but they are in fact doing it.
>>18442998See pic rel>>18443003It's true, there would be no reason to send weapons to an enemy country instead of just backing the country fighting them, makes no sense
>>18443010How have they picked fights with the US and Israel when they helped the US invade Iraq and Afghanistan and fought their enemies for them while they never fired a single shot at israel for their whole existence until like last year
>>18443014They backed Iraq with open funding and arms sales. I can't believe you don't know that either lol. Iran didn't have that luxury, they had to trade hostagesAnd yes, I already said, the GCC don't supply arms or support Hamas. They just pledge funds that will go through Israel, who will decide how the money gets spent.
>>18443019>They backed Iraq with open funding and arms sales.Still less than they sent to Iran, a supposedly hostile nation>And yes, I already said, the GCC don't supply arms or support Hamas. Hamas doesn't equate Palestine. Do Palestinians who don't support Hamas not deserve any humanitarian aid? Rhetorical question since we already know what Iran's terrorist militias did to the people who opposed their terrorism
>>18442965So by that logic Saddam and Sunnis were even worse than Iran, since he objectively got more aid, and he didn't trade hostages for aid. Saddam was just getting straight up aid. You're going to be consistent in your logic, right?
>>18443023>Still less than they sent to Iran, a supposedly hostile nationFactually untrue, and you could have saved yourself the embarrassment by googling first >>18443027And yes, supporting Hamas is real aid for Palestine, unlike sending money through Israel for it to spend however it wants.
>>18443027Last time i checked it wasn't Saddam who referred to America as the Great Satan
>>18443031Its hard to estimate to what extent the military aid to Iran was since conveniently a lot of evidence of the operation was destroyed. Its funny how for all these decades they have antagonized Iran and such but never to the extent that the regime collapses, despite the fact that i think the US has the ability to do it
I have ZOGbot fatigue
>>18441521>If Shia-Sunni unity was natural as Haqiqatjou Why dont you reply to him directly to this instead of bringing it to /his/ where nobody cares and nobody was advocating Daniel’s view to begin with?
>>18442979>They blow Iran out of the water.Temporary luxury inflated with oil money is not sophistication. The GCC has a negligible economy aside from petroleum products.They will be completely uninhabitable in a month if the US Iran ceasefire breaks down, the US begins striking Iranian infrastructure and Iran destroys GCC power infrastructure in response (no water, no AC).
>>18443066It's a thinly veiled /pol/ thread. He could post there, nobody would complain, but he insists on posting the same thread here every day
>>18442547BASED ngl the Wahabbi flavor of "Salafi" "sunnis" are evil cruel subhumans speaking from experience.
>>18443066Anon would never want to take it up to Daniel's doorstep and debate it there. This archetype BY DESIGN refuses to debate or confront their critics. It's not a bug, it is a feature. https://yewtu.be/APA0htT-AV0?t=7688... straight from the sauce.
>>18443042>The US armed Iran to fight Saddam>Ok Iran was trading American hostages for arms but behind that they were secretly friends working against Saddam>Ok Saddam was armed by the US too but it wasn't as much as what Iran got>Ok Iraq was openly getting billions in aid but I still feel like Iran was America's REAL ally and must have gotten more somewhere!
>>18441568>I hate Iranians more than Israel>the Jews are at least our Semitic cousins we can coexist>If it is the Jews that do it I won't be dancing for joy with them but i won't be crying for the Iranians>"I won't be dancing for joy with them but">"but">but the Jews are redeemable>[...] the hatred they have is 10x that which the Jews have>>18441521>[...] marrying a Jew woman. Sure it's permissible for them>"it's permissible for them" >>18441522/threadIYKYK
>>18441089Pardon my ignorance, but what is the correct denomination: Shia or Sunni? Please help and enlighten a curious kafir.
>>18443657There were some significant succession disputes and wars after the death of Muhammad. The defining feature of the Sunnis is they love all sides of the civil wars and say they were all on the right side. The Shias on the other hand are partisans of Ali and dislike the other factions that fought him. They don’t believe in the concept of “all sides were good”, they just follow Ali and his family since they were also the Prophet’s family. That’s the historical basis, and the theological differences build from there.
>>18442979Just wait till the oil money runs out
