You spend a lot of time looking down on us and calling us Jeet, but you venerate this "Indo-European" thing while ironically, our living oral tradition of the Vedic Sanskrit Brahmanas is far more rigorous than that of the Homeric traditions, and ANYTHING EUROPEAN. The R̥gvaidaprātiśākʰyám and Sāmavaidaprātiśākʰyám (~1000 BC) and the Aʂʈādʱyā́yī of Pā́ɳiniʂ (~700 BC) explicitly distinguish the svárās both in the 'recitation' cʰándas of the R̥gvaidás (~1900-1300 BC)In fact, the writing of tones in the Greek alphabet around 700 BC does not equate to the contemporary development of an accentuation system. All Indo-European studies are possible practically due to Vedic Sanskrit, not Greek, not Germanic, not Slavic. The same with mythology and any kind of reconstruction of PIE, which again depends immensely on the Indic. It's ironic that you accuse us of being LARPs while you worshipped Semitic gods and threw all your pagan tradition in the trash and somehow, you are the true Aryans kek
>>18441800you are a meme
Whites are culture vultures. More news at 10.
>>18441800Poo in loo, jeet.
>>18441800Yeah you guys got a chance to convert to Christianity with St. Thomas and largely rejected it. Hence Islam came in wrecked your shit. How is worshiping rats working out for you? Your country is just the latest Zionist project. They had wanted China, but they got tossed out. So yours will have to do.
>>18441820You posted a retarded meme without any historical accuracy or impartiality seal. Congratulations! By the way, you didn't even have the capacity to understand the thread, lol.
>>18441835>I want historical accuracyyou can't handle it
>>18441800Hindi is actually less conservative than Icelandic or Lithuanian and the ancestors of those languages at the time the Rigveda was composed were most likely more archaic than Vedic. Now everyone knows Proto-Indo-Iranic (PII) is not an early break-off from PIE at all but emerged about 1000 years AFTER PIE was spoken.
>>18441846Nobody mentioned Hindi, and besides, this isn't just our isolated opinion, but that of most modern Western linguists. See the related photo. Vedic is still treated as having more archaisms.
>>18441849Maybe in 1800, yes.But Lithuanian is widely considered the most conservative living Indo-European language.
>>18441800Whoa those inferior Greeks invaded India in 327 BC. How did India invade the West 2000+ years later? By crying about how mean the Brits were and begging to be let in?
>>18441853this is a nationalistic exageratio
>>18441858Off topic
>>18441858>By crying about how mean the Brits were and begging to be let in?lol never happens
>>18441800Germanic languages exhibit less non-IE substrate than most IE languages.
>>18441881
>>18441800>All Indo-European studies are possible practically due to Vedic Sanskrit, not Greek, not Germanic, not Slavic.This is like saying children are possible only because of mothers or only because of fathers. No woman: no children. No man: no children.Indo-European studies are the product of the comparative method. That means there is nothing Indo-European to talk about until one branch is compared to the other.That said, a lot of research in the field has historically been the result of comparing Ancient Greek and Vedic data.
>>18441930>Indo-European studies are the product of the comparative methodWhich is, in fact, heavily influenced by Sanskrit>>18441800
Saarnskrit
>>18441820>>18441844trvthnvke
Jeet sub humans ancestor the dravidian were conquered by 6ft tall Aryan who eat Raw milk and were pastoralists and used Chariots to easily defeat them.They then proceeded to develop the hindus valeey civilization which had flush toiletes and other such thing.To keep jeets away from their cows they made them vegans and made them worship their cowsand to humiliate themnthey made them bathe in cow dung.They were selected to be slaves, thats why they always Lost and were conquered every single time.The British raj gave them names like Akshit or sukhdeep for a reason to ridicule them and told them it means victory or whatever.Their genetics are coded in slave morality, scaming poo and rape wss how they d increase their rank
>>18441951Sanskrit may be available for many comparisons, but the point is Indo-European studies is not a mirror for Indo-Aryan language and culture so it can gaze at its own reflection. Every point of data is established by comparing one thing to the other. We cannot know if something is likely to go back to Proto-Indo-Europeans without two or more witnesses.
Could you shit in the street instead of my board next time? Sheesh the gall of you cowpiss drinkers
>>18441800You have to understand that you're a low iq mutt with over 80% non-Indo-European ancestry, you have absolutely fuck shit to do with the real Indo-Aryans that settled in IndiaUnless, of course, you look like this
>>18441825Proto Indo Europeans were white, you retarded retard
>>18441846All those languages are modern, when comparing ancient languages or, even better, proto-languages, you can see how Proto Indo Iranian is the language with the least amount of sound changes from PIE, way less than, for example, Proto Germanic or Proto Balto Slavic, althought the latter is very conservative still
>>18442086No, isn't
them totally severing the religio-cultural continuity with their ancestors. Only Hindus have preserved Indo-European religion. And Sanskrit, the language which is the most conservative (due to effect of Paninian grammer) was also preserved by Hindus. The languages of Europeans
>>18442082Yamnaya were clearly darker than modern Europeans & had black hair & brown eyes for most part. Europeans received these traits from non steppe people like WHG or EEF who mixed with the Steppe peoples. So overall it's clear that only Hindus have the right to call themselves Arya.
>>18442080>>18441969appropriate Hindu tradition by claiming to be "true Aryan" and calling Hindus Dasa, Pajeet or whatever. Dasyu was used for people who didn't perform vedic sacrifices as Hindu scriptures show. So the Europeans will be actually classed as Dasyu or mleccha by actual Aryas of yore.
>>18442152>clearly darker than modern EuropeansThey literally had the same skin tones found in europe according to genetics.Proto-Indo-Iranians were even whiter
>>18442155No, they didn't. They resembled zagrosian pops regarding skin tone>Proto-Indo-Iranians were even whiterLooked like French, at best
>>18442158>No, they didn't.Yes, they did in fact have European skin tones. What you are thinking is that they were swarthier than modern Northern Europeans. This is true but they still had European skin tones.
>Proto-Indo-Iranians
>>18442154Aryans of Yore wouldn’t even classify as you human.>>18442158>they were brown so it’s ok they raped mePathetic. Jeets are so pathetic.Imagine being reduced to arguing the people who raped you were less White than previously thought…lol>that means they were more like meNo. It means swarthy Austrian looking BVLLs were raping you.Arnie black nigger raped you lmaoPot belly full of ghee
Modern Indians and ancient Indians are absolutely not the same people, you are a fallen and corrupted race
>>18441800you're brown, stop appealing to white people for respect. no one will ever like jeets because they're ugly as fuck, physically weak, dirty, and spergy. nothing you can say or do will change how repulsive you are.
Btfo
