Completely justified
Louis did not betray the Revolution, the Revolution betrayed Louis.
You’re trans
So are you
>>18441991https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevali%C3%A8re_d%27%C3%89onHistorically the first famous French tranny. An aristocrat who worked for the old regime.The revolution denied him and he died in exile in Britain.Revolutionaries hated trannies and considered trannyism to be a decadent aristocratic degeneracy. Versailles housed many transvestites and they were all hanged.
>>18442021Degenerate secularist revolutionaries had no worldview to substantiate anti-trannyism, now all their heirs are trannies.
>>18442025They had a hunch and it proved to be correct. The real heirs of the revolution are the fascists, and the real heirs of the old regime are the democrats, christians, republicans, conservatives and other social democrats.
>the democrats, christians, republicans, conservatives and other social democrats.Those are all one thing
>>18442021I deny youJean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès (1753–1824) was Napoleon Bonaparte's primary gay advisor, serving as the Second Consul and Arch-Chancellor of the Empire. As a brilliant legal mind, he helped draft the Napoleonic Code and was trusted with delicate political negotiations,Napoleon always surrounded himself with inordinately handsome young men
>>18442057There is a massive difference between faggots (acceptable) and trannies (not so)>Napoleon always surrounded himself with inordinately handsome young menWell of course, he was French
>>18442064Not that French people tend to surround themselves with young men, but all young French men are inordinately handsome
>>18442064There’s nothing acceptable about being a faggot you faggot
>>18442064Anti Khoimeni is that you
>>18441980Brunswick Manifesto. The nobility threatened the people of Paris, and France, that they'd be slaughtered (genocide) if they touched the royal family (implied, the rest of the nobility). Their agents went and came back to report to Capets about this – and they agreed to have the people of Paris genocided as a consequence. The French royal family always was at odds with the people. The nobility had shown their murderous perfidy & wickedness. The Jacobins had all the proof, claims, and motivation for republicanism through and through that they needed. Everyone who says Louis was betrayed, or his family, or the nobility, is either a degenerate fool who doesn't know nor understand his/her interests, or a counter-republican cipher feudalist. >>18442025>now all their heirs are trannies.Their heirs aren't trannies. You're the confused one.>>18442057>>18442064>>18442065Faggotry is strictly monarchical (hierarchy), not republican.
>>18442403Louis was betrayed, the peasant dominated government refused to protect him, the head of state from a mob of sans cullets who kidnapped him and his family from Versailles and imprisoned him in Paris. He had to turn to someone else for safety.
how are you all so fucked up
>>18442403Keep telling yourself these lies, republican faggot
>>18442403>Brunswick ManifestoThe only bad thing about it is that it wasn't carried out once the Napoleonic Regime fell.
>>18441980You may not like it, but this is the truth.
>>18442413He had no legitimacy because no one was willing to listen to him. And even if they did, he was such an indecisive lemming that the nation would have withered waiting for his orders. The National Guard was the only thing keeping him from being totally deposed during the early stages of the Revolution but he still despised Lafayette. Because Louis was a self-absorbed narcissist like all monarchs. >>18441980>>18442592Louis betrayed France. From the start, even during the constitutional monarchy, he had no intention of working with the legislature or following the constitution. And correspondence revealed that he was coordinating with emigré traitors to invade France and kill Frenchmen. He wanted to keep his throne even if it meant stepping over thousands of corpses to do it.
>>18442438They have no personality beyond hating anything that isn't them
>>18442665Tranny
>>18442499In a monarchy you can't even contest the faggots.You are pretty much stuck with your god-ordained divine monarch who tells you to accept faggots. Meanwhile in a republic I am free to say that as a free citizen i believe we should guillotine all of them.
>>18442665That's rightVive la France
>>18442608>He had no legitimacyHe was the constitutional monarch, the official head of state with the right of veto, basicly the UN security council.>no one was willing to listen to him.Because he was a prisoner of the mob, who could extort him, he was kept as a pet, not a ruler.In these circumstances, he had to make contact with friends and relatives who would protect him.
>>18443385>He was the constitutional monarch, the official head of state with the right of veto, basicly the UN security council.Nobody elected him.>Because he was a prisoner of the mob, who could extort him, he was kept as a pet, not a ruler.If the person isn't the pet of the mob, then that person isn't a ruler. Who voted for him? Nobody.>In these circumstances, he had to make contact with friends and relatives who would protect him.By slaughtering all the people of Paris, notwithstanding the rest of France that were sick, tired, and exasperated being ruled by a hegemonic hereditary nobility. >«No, no, no bruv, you don't understand. Only they have the sole “divine right” to harass, abuse, torture, and kill whomever they want, whenever they want & feel like it, all the rest of us are meant to just endure & accept it “with honor, dignity, and valor” the fate of subservience to them & theirs, simply because the dick & pussy from which we came into this world didn't had self-appointed made-up titulature within the inner walls of castles & palaces exclaimed by their posse companions to witness it, nor the “pedigree” features that act as signals to our place in a society.»Do you hear yourself, cretin?
