why nazis were so weak?
Hitler didnt wanna do what was neccessary>inb4 whatGas the jews but real, if he had actualy done that hed win
>>18441973it took the whole world ganging up on them to stop them from making europe a white ethnostate free of jew control... thank god they lost, lol
>>18441982they got raped by bolshevisk despite the backing of entire europe
>>18441973A Bolshevik is a natural predator of nazis
>>18441973They weren't, they performed well above given the conditions, Hitler just made strategic mistakesIf it was German Mao instead, entirety of Europe would be speaking German today, including Britain, especially Britain
this >>18441976Hitler wasn't extreme enough, too kindly, too compassionate we need to go even further next time
>>18441982Literally the opposite, they had a bunch of countries with them when they invaded the USSR, Finland, Italy, Romania, Slovakia, Hungary, etc. And the USSR still spanked them to the point after less than one year they knew they fucked up and they were going to lose
>>18441990>entire Europe
>>18442456You have to be 18 to post here. And actually engange with history rather than playing HOI IV
>>18442494Nazishits ganged up on the USSR with a plethora of countries behind them, and they got destroyed, that's what happened, now keep crying nazishit, or even better follow your meth-head hero Adolf Shitler
>>18442542>ganged uplets see the collective population of the European Axis powers vs the collective population of the degenerated worker's state.European Axis was outnumbered by 20m in the most generous estimate you give to the Soviet Onion.While also fighting on the Western and African and Balkan fronts, and at sea.the USSR is a paper tiger destroyed by a mere five decades of trying to build a functional economy without free Ameribux.
>>18441973Germany is poor and weak state in comparison to UK and US.>Why?Because Germany wasn't centralized state until late 19th century, it wasn't liberal enough and it hadn't colonies or trade routes that could provide wealth (as Italian city-states had).
>>18441973Bolshevism is just that strong
>>18441973>why nazis wereESL THREADESL THREAD
>>18442009Can you go into detail about this? Unbiased Commie Chinese history is really hard to find, western sources all hate China and screech Mao was a retard and a buffoon and he just won because the other side was even more retarded. "Asian" sources apparently claim Mao won through the magic of friendship and practically didn't even need to fight, people just loved him and Communism that much.How would a German Mao differ? And why do you think a German Mao would win WW2 and even defeat britain? What did Mao do?
