>when shitler breaks non-aggression pacts, it's okay
Besides the fact that this is historically not true? I don't think Stalin made any significant preparation against the Nazis
>implying Stalin did not break a non-aggression pact with Japan>>18442255See Operation Groza
>>18442255>>18442255It's because the Red Army soldiers were deployed in a forward position massed on the border. This is seen as proof they were about to attack. But it's because in the purges Stalin killed or imprisoned all the skilled generals, and the ones who were left thought layering the units to provide deep defenses so you could get the enemy to overextend was seen as cowardly and anti-Communist. In the Tukhachevsky he was accused of trying to conspire with the enemy and weaken the Red Army by doing this. Yes, it had no rational reason why those troops were all up there on the border. Also following the line of reasoning that the Soviets were going to invade Germany because of how the troops were placed, they would have had to be planning them to mobilize offensively imminently around the same exact time as Operation Barbarossa.
>>18442255>this is historically not truehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barbarossa>Soviet armies>Frontline strength (22 June 1941)>2.6–2.9 million personnel>11,000 tanks>7,133–9,100 military aircraft
>>18442247I know he's a gook that doesn't know anything about history, but why the fuck would he reference a non aggression pact with Poland in defence of Germany?!?
>>18442317And that is proof the Soviets were about to invade Germany, how?
Yeah... why would the soviets station troops on the border of an agressive neighbor who's attacking all his other neighbors? truly a mystery lost in time.
>>18442354It's not like those troops were dug in, with well supplied defensive formations. Taking that into account unless the Soviet army just enjoyed Poland that much, gearing for an offensive operation can be assumed.The Soviets were also making threatening demands of Romania at this time, a member of the axis and Germany sole source of strategic oil&petroleum.
This gook is beyond retarded.
The jewish state was a menace by simply existing
>>18442422What Jewish state?
>>18442422Cool, so thankfully there wasnt one then.
>>18442247
>>18442529poolish national identity is a fake and gay facade created and maintained by jews to weaken both europe and russia.whiteness is the only meaningful identifier which is why it is the only group identity actively suppressed in this modern age of so called progressive tolerance
>>18442540>whiteness is the only meaningful identifier
>Why are you preparing wor a war against a guy who got in power by writing a best selling book about how he's going to invade you and kill or enslave everyone
>>18442556>hitler wrote the Talmuddoubt.jpg
seriously modern neonazi revisionist is so retarded, we literally have thousands of speeches literature and art presenting very clearly that hitler started ww2 because he wanted more "living space" for the germans.Holocaust denial makes more sense because at least they weren't advertising it.
>>18442557he wrote mein kamp and multiple chapters when he explains that germany needs to destroy "Inferior" slavic civilisation to create living space for the germans.
>>18442570You know, you jews need a new playbook... accusing everyone else of what you are yourselves doing can only get you so far, and only anywhere with retards
>>18442570Slavs as a race have been mentioned two times in Mein Kampf, in both instances when Hitler talked about Austria-Hungary being a multi-ethnic empire. The Nazis certainly had racial biases agaibst the slavs, that was unfortunally very gommon across all of Western Europe, but they were not in any way unique in their hatred.
>>18442577Do you people mindlessly believe anything you read on the internet as long as it's antisemitic? Do you even check if the stupid shit you post is in any way real?
>>18442583Poles, Czechs and Russians are all mentioned multiple times and pretty much never in a positive light.
>>18442585>he said from the idf cyber intelligence center located at tel aviv while knowingly shilling false information on the internet
>>18442589I'm currently attending a public event, so I cannot consult all the chapters I have marked, but I try to mention everything I remember. When I get home, I'll add whatever I forgot:Russia was treated as an adversary in the book. There were indeed racist elements when talking about Russia (such as the passage where he attributed Russia's successful culture to the supposed significant Germanic Elements in the Aristocracy), but it was not treated as an existential Threat, at least not anymore than France or Britain. Hitler even mentioned the possibility od Russia allying with Germany, but struck it down later in the book due to Russia not being logistically able to support the German War effort. Oh, and that the backwardness of the Russians (noteable, he focused on material such as illiteracy and poverty, not purely racial factors thoigh obviously like most Western Europeans at the time Hitler would have seen a correlation between the two) made them susceptible to "Jewish Influences" after the Aristocracy was defeated.Poland was mentioned a few times. One time as a neutral example ("a German catholic will always be German like a Polish, Hungarian, Czech Catholic will always be Polish/Hungarian/Czech), one time as already mentioned in Austria-Hungary where he ranted about the multi-cultural nature of Austria-Hungary (even there he focused mostly on the jews). The most negative passage about slavs I can remember was a general condemnation against German Laws for citizenship where he mentioned Polish children along many other races being classified as German citizens because they were born on German soil. Even then, no action followed this thought as nazi racial laws did not officially discriminate against slavic-German Citizens already residing inside the German borders. It was a lot more muddy in the later conquered Slavic territories, but obviously no conqueror is going to treat conquered people as equals.
>>18442602>Word limit>Hitler even mentioned the possibility od Russia allying with Germany, but struck it down later in the book due to Russia not being logistically able to support the German War effort.I wanted to add that something similar also was stated about Poland.>Halb war die Polenpolitik. Man reizte, ohne jemals ernstlich durchzugreifen. Das Ergebnis war weder ein Sieg des Deutschtums noch eine Versöhnung der Polen, dafür aber Feindschaft mit Rußland.(=Half was the Polish policy. They provoked without seriously acting. The result was neither a German victory nor a reconciliation with Poland, but a hostile relation with Russia).There is still a racial sentiment in that yegment, but it should show that the nazis did not consider slavs a mortal enemy.Lebensraum was a strategic decision to establish Germany as strong enough to resist foreign influences (Britain, France, Russia and whatever else the nazis failed to reconcile with) after the German colonial project in Africa and Asia failed and Germany realised they cannot match Britain on the sea, even mentioned as such in Mein Kampf. I will cite the specific pages when I'm at home.
>>18442602>The most negative passage about slavs I can rememberLet's not mention the: "I'd rather strangle a Pole than suffer him to speak German. Them speaking our language is the most dire threat to our people and it was our good luck that the Austrian experiment largely failed before it could be taken too far."-bit.
>>18442583Thats just not true, he talks about how russian are subhuman slavs who created a state by copying germans and then it was take over by jews, and that slavs cant have a nation without it being run by jews so they need to be destroyed.I really don't know why you have to lie.
>>18442247The USSR broke the pact first with the invasion of Northern Bukovina
>>18442640It isn't. The most negative thing Hitler stated about Russia was that it was subverted by jews, nowhere were Russia or any other Slavic country considered an unique enemy worthy of extermination. To some extent, he even wrote in a sympathetic light.>Das furchtbarste Beispiel dieser Art bildet Rußland, wo er an dreißig Millionen Menschen in wahrhaft fanatischer Wildheit teilweise unter unmenschlichen Qualen tötete oder verhungern ließ, um einem Haufen jüdischer Literaten und Börsenbanditen die Herrschaft über ein großes Volk zu sichern. (Page 358, volume 1)In English: "The most dreadful example of this kind is Russia, where he (the jew which he refers to as tyrant of the cultures in this specific chapter), in truly fanatical savagery, had thirty million people killed or left to starve—partly under inhuman torment—in order to secure the rule of a gang of Jewish literati and stock-exchange bandits over a great nation." Again, I'm not denying the nazis held racist views against slavic people. But the basis for the later genocidal policies during WW2 were not motivated out of ideological reasons. For all intents and purposes, Eastern Europe could have been populated by French people or whatever and the Nazi foreign policy wouldn't have changed. Slavs were not a primary factor in Nazi ideology, they merely inherited the German-typical anti-slav hatred from the previous German goverments without any modifications to it.
>>18442639You are missinterpreting. The quote is bullshit, I don't know from where you have pulled it, certainly not Mein Kampf. Here is the actual quote:>Unfortunately, a policy towards Poland, whereby the East was to be Germanized, was demanded by many and was based on the same false reasoning. Here again it was believed that the Polish people could be Germanized by being compelled to use the German language. The result would have been fatal. A people of foreign race would have had to use the German language to express modes of thought that were foreign to the German, thus compromising by its own inferiority the dignity and nobility of our nation.It certainly includes racist rhetoric, but it was by no means a declaration against the existence of Polish people. Especially when you consider the wider context, that it was just a random example he mentioned to dispute Human-blank-slateism.
>>18442357They were allies up until 1941. The Soviets celebrated hitters victories over the west, saying he was smashing captialism
>>18442577Yet it is Russia that is killing off Russian speakers in ukraine and importing muslims to places like Mariupol
>>18442357The hilarious part is they didn't
>telling the Truth makes judes meltdown
>>18442791Now post the part when he said that russians were unable to form a civilization and needed Germanic blood to create anything of worth.
>>18442402>They weren't ready to defend therefore they must've been about to attackAn arguement completely without logic, especially the bit about defensive supplies, there was basically no difference between "defensive" and offensive supplies, you're basically acknowleding they were prepared to attack. And the main reason why the soviets weren't ready was Barbarossa had been delayed due to Italian failures in the south, soviet spys had reported the original date of invasion to Stalin, and when nothing happened they were accused of being double agents and killed. Then when new reports of the new date of invasion arrived in Moscow, Stalin refused to believe them and had those spies killed as well. >The Soviets were also making threatening demands of Romania at this time>At this timeIt was nearly a full year prior retard, and when Romania asked Germany for support or to protest the soviet action Hitler refused.
>>18442910Why don't you. I kept citing excerpts from Mein Kampf while you called me a liar.
>>18442991I never called you a liar. >why don't youI'm on my phone and can't find it, but I'm sure this part is there. He talks about Rurik and German elites being responsible for Russian achievements.
>>18442564What’s that little guy in Romania supposed to be?
>>18442247>>18442317>>18442402>"Let us invade Germany comrade">"What About those million men in Japan?">"Nah fuck them, we would not want too much of an advantage">"Should we bring up the thousands of tanks near Kiev forward?">"No need comrade, a soviet tank is worth 10000 german ones">"What about shooting at all the german aircraft flying Over head?">"What are you crazy then how would the germans know we are coming?"
>>18442810>The result would have been fatal. A people of foreign race would have had to use the German language to express modes of thought that were foreign to the German, thus compromising by its own inferiority the dignity and nobility of our nation.He's saying that ESLs are memetically corrupting the American Way of Life whenever they talk English with their funny accents.That's somewhat racist, I imagine, and there aren't many safeguards against it, other than making the Poles stop drawing breath.
Those aren't early war tanks
>>18442247Actually the Soviets reneged on the Ribbentrop Molotov pact on September 1, 1939 already by _not_ attacking Poland together with Germany. Hitler was pretty certain that Britain and France would not intervene because they would have to realistically declare war against both Germany and USSR in that case and that would not have been a winnable scenario for them. Hitler lost everything on that day as a two front war for Germany became certainty.Mind you that the Soviets were just faster on the trigger (and HOW fast they were - the pact lasted a week kek); it's not that Germany didn't intend to attack them in the near future anyway.
>>18442247>>when shitler breaks non-aggression pacts, it's okayno one said this and Germany never did this.The Soviets violated the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact first.>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_occupation_of_Bessarabia_and_Northern_Bukovina>The Soviet invasion of Bukovina in 1940 violated the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, since it went beyond the Soviet sphere of influence that had been agreed with the Axis.[7]
>>18442810>>18443166These are actually very wise words, the niggerification and mudification of European speech is a testament to this.Browns will of course see this as a cultural victory, but the logical conclusion is Europeans will descend out of liberalism and into the same tribal warfare mode of thought that dominates browns, except Europeans will actually be capable of racially replacing browns through hard power, nukes, drones, heavy armor divisions, ballistic missiles, etc.Always be chimping as the Alt Right has said.
>>18442564>neonazibuzzword, neonazis dont exist>revisionistYou are the revisionist.>literally have thousandsShow us a single speech where Hitler says "I want to genocide all Eastern Europeans so I can replace them with Germans."He never said this.Also "Lebensraum" was NEVER EVER anywhere near the center of Nazi political policy.National Socialist foreign policy was CONSTANTLY kowtowing to idiots like Poles, Yugroids, Slovaks, and Ukrops.>holocaust denialThere's nothing to deny, we know today the holocaust was a lie because we have video evidence of other jewish lies such as the 40 beheaded babies lie and the Epstein files revealing the numerous lies told about jewish lobbying in American and British politics.jewish unreliability has become a serious problem and we can no longer assume jewish stories are reliable defacto.The holocaust must therefore be proven beyond a doubt, which hasnt been.no one is saying jews never died in war, we are saying there is no reasonable evidence of a concerted effort to attack or annihilate the jewish people in Europe.>but wordsWords are not evidence.Words are not evidence of state policy.Words are not evidence of actions.Furthermore, the quick kill is easy, Lebensraum isnt possible with Germany's population. The decision to go east wasnt made in 1933, it was made in 1941.>they were always planning itcan we see military plans for an invasion of Eastern Europe drawn up before 1935?no? Then we MUST conclude there was no long term plan against East Europe.America had plans to invade the UK in 1920.Is this evidence of an imminent American war against Britain in 2026?If Germany had literally no plans, then what does that say about Germany's actual foreign policy?You're wrong.There was no GPOThere was no HolocaustThere was no genocide against SlavsSlavs chimped out, Slavs died in the millions, just like they are TODAY in Orkrain.>baba said it sacred warnope. just more slavic stupidity causing millions dead.
>>18442810Was Shitler unaware of how many Slavs and Balts were assimilated in the Drang nach Osten? Entire noble families with clearly Germanized names served in the Prussian military aristocracy.
>>18442585you didnt disprove the claim or show the evidence was unreliable.>ha silly nazis fall for anythingThis would be true if every prediction they made didnt turn out to be correct.
>>18442543>but I dont think it iswell your enemies do, so adapt or die, Pooland
>>18442498>>18442523The jewish agency established in 1929 called itself "the jewish state".Was it not a jewish state despite being a governing body of an explicitly jewish body furthering jewish interests and pushing territorial claims?It fits the definition of a state.Why dont you know this? Shouldnt jews know their own history like when their state began?>it wasnt recognizedwell neither is israel today so I guess Hezbollah is justified then, you agree right? muslims should overrun israel because its not a real state, correct?
>>18444551you really believe that such a speech would be delivered and then printed? you live in a cartoon world. it's obvious slavic self-aggrandizing, pretending their praise comes from the enemy.
>>18444551There's no claim, there's a fake article allegedly published in a paper that itself might be fake.Why would some rabbi publish such a speech in a newspaper called The Slav? Like I said, you don't ask yourself such questions because you're dumb as fuck.
>>18444558I have no idea what you babble about.
>>18444551>you didnt disprove the claim or show the evidence was unreliable.The only thing floating around on the internet is said speech, according to an article it was published in the magazine in 2001 after a letter of the speech was sent to the newspaper company and yet not a single person online can show even 1 image of that excerpt in the magazine, they only post that html link from Henry Makow in the image(which doesn't work anymore)I found this site: https://gibraltar-messenger.net/ww3/ukraine-war-chabads-strategy-for-slavic-genocide/ which shows a few links which are either dead or lead to some anime gambling site or whatever like this one below(ironically it's the one which is supposed to lead to the speech by Schneerson)https://justice4poland.com/2016/05/17/chabad-leader-messiah-menachem-mendel-schneerson-on-his-plans-for-destroying-ukraine-and-russia-reprint/All in all, the evidence is very lackluster
>>18444548Why do neonazis always say neonazis don't exist? You have just wrote pathetic lies-filled apologetics for your hero Shitler, you are a neonazi. At least have the guts to admit what you are
>>18445492>why are not following the ideology of the strawman we built of you?
>>18442402Those troops were in the process of digging in and building bunkers when they were caught by surprise and destroyed. It makes no sense to build bunkers if you're planning for offensive war. The reality was that Stalin hoped that Germany and the UK would destroy each other first. He had several reports from multiple sources about the imminent invasion and rejected all of them because he didn't believe the Germans would betray him. The USSR was still exporting strategic resources to Germamy up to hours before the invasion. >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov_Line
