How would you calmly counterargue against author of the picture?
>>18445520CSA wasnt fighting to stop the USA from not becoming white, that's what the Union troops and Lincoln were fighting for before a Jew from the CSA killed lincoln to stop him from sending his BULL friends to Liberia
>>18445520By stating the fact that if the Confederacy won the war they would make their side look just as bad as Brazil and America as a whole would be weaker on the international scale and probably not even be able to be a great power like it is today.America right not is definitely far from perfect, but it would be a lot worse if the Union lost.
>>18445524Ohhh, so you're saying that the CSA were LGTBTQP+ intersectionalist rad-feminists with holocaust studies degrees?
>>18445520They'd actually come to the conclusion that all blacks need to be sent to Liberia and that the Jews need to be culled, not that the people wanting to turn the South into Brazil are right.
>"Brother, I am sorry. You were absolutely right about everything. You can keep your nigger pets for all eternity!">"Well shucks, Yank! You ain't half bad.'">Union cuts losses and leaves the South>Union goes on to develop as industrial superpower it was always destined to be>Confederacy develops into... you guessed it, Haiti 2.0! But this time, with negro Communism
>>18445547They're still be dumb Scots-Irish with groid dna, so no it'd be Brazil as this anon already said >>18445538
>>18445566>They're still be dumb
>>18445547We’re saying that the Confederates post war plan was literally to absorb the Caribbean and Central America then import infinite Blacks. Would've just become Haiti.
>>18445604>We’re sayingWho is 'we'? You're butt buddy at Chabad Lubavitch center for international dick sucking?>post war planLook, the whole Generalplan Ost myth was kind of funny, but you can stop now. The same joke isn't funny more than once.
>>18445615The actual spark for the war was southerners wanting to BLACK the new western states. Their desire for BBC was insatiable.
>>18445618Kek
>>18445560This wasn't allowed to happen because it was the North that was economically dependent on the South, while the South would've been vastly better off without the North.>Confederacy develops into... you guessed it, Haiti 2.0It was the war, the abolition of slavery, and the devastation it brought that turned the South into Haiti-lite. Before then it was one of the most modern societies on earth with a lot of potential. You're just writing alt-history fiction to justify your negrophilia.
>>18445921>modern society >still agrarian and still practicing slavery (and outdated practice by the 19th century)Lmao cool delusions.
>>18445604As long as Africans keep selling their slaves to people.
>>18445926It wasn't outdated, it was a highly profitable and efficient system in the American South and West Indies, and was only abolished for ideological reasons. Its replacement with far less productive free Negro labor was an economic disaster for the South; suddenly the spooks got uppity and couldn't be made to work in the same way. The Confederate States constituted the fifth most industrialized society on earth; even the slaves ate better than most Europeans, excepting the English.
>>18445921>it was one of the most modern societies on earthtop kek
>>18445604>Unionboos unironically believe the Golden Circle was a serious thing that was ever actually going to be attemptedEmbarassing, you have no right to pretend you're better than lost causers
>>18445566>>18445538>Brazil began as 65% Englishcan you prove this?>>18445520You cant, giving slaves suffrage was a mistake and has always been a mistake.You kill them or keep them as slaves, never set them free.>THATS LE HECKIN NOT WHOLESOME CHUNGUSwe dont live in boomer America where we have the luxury of bourgeois liberalism, nor do we want to be violently overthrown, which blacks can not do as they have failed numerous revolts and their sole successful revolt out of many thousands was against women and children and was itself supported by a brigade of European soldiers, however this revolt was eventually crushed anyway and its descendants eat mud to this day.All of this to say, liberalism is moral syphilis, it is not progressive, it is regressive, it generates new problems and doesnt even solve old ones.The answer to the slave question, kill them or keep them, it is never abolition.only lefties and literal groids will seethe at this because it offends their feefees.
>>18445520>they were right, we should've imported even more niggersExplain. Why is importing more niggers a good thing?
>>18445560>>Confederacy develops into... you guessed it, Haiti 2.0! But this time, with negro CommunismCan you point to a single example where a 65% English country developed into Haiti but with Communism?>>18445604>post war planis there evidence the Confederate Congress was drawing up policy to do this?What legislation did they pass to prepare for this eventuality?Can you prove this was inevitable? how?>infinite blacksbut you love blacks, you're pretending to be racist to culture-jam the chuds who you think like slavery but dont like blacks, pro tip, no one like that exists.You pretend they do because youre an idiot.You missed the entire 2023 debate within the actual Right and Racist circles where they argued endlessly over if Lincoln was proto-Hitler.your "arguments" would work better on your liberal grandparents who are vaguely racist but still believe in voting and wouldnt support TND.You dont even support TND lol.
>>18446028You know what, youre right, we should have kept them as slaves and banned the importation of new ones, right, going so far as to criminalize smuggling blacks and impose penalties on those who did.You agree with this correct?Surely, the answer isnt giving literal aggressive fauna with an IQ in the low 80s Access to White people right?You do support segregation correct? If not TND entirely?You are racist like me yes, you say "niggers" like I do right?
>>18446043why do you think that the csa would've done any of that?
>the entire country should've been more like the south
>>18445566Why do retards pretend the south is entirely """scots irish""" when they only settled the upland south and they're half english and half lowland scots anyway?the south was always majority descended from southern english settlers.>b-but they have black dnaif southerners have black DNA why do they cluster exactly with southern englishmen?
>>18446090the south in 1860 was whiter than america is today
>>18446082because they were racist and that is what racists do.You are racist arent you? why dont you understand?
>>18446109If they were racists then why did they import so many niggers?
>>18446028>>18446082The CSA banned the importation of slaves retard.>Section 9.1. The importation of negroes of the African race from any foreign country, other than the slaveholding States or Territories of the United States of America, is hereby forbidden; and Congress is required to pass such laws as shall effectually prevent the same.https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America#a1-s9
>>18446127>importing niggers is bad but breeding them is fine>im supposed to believe that these people totally wanted an ethnostate and the niggers magically appeared out of nowhere
>>18446134>>importing niggers is bad but breeding them is fineAre you under the impression that blacks haven't reproduced since the 1860s?>>im supposed to believe that these people totally wanted an ethnostateIn the sense they wanted a state that exclusively served the interests of whites? Yes they did.>>niggers magically appeared out of nowhereNo one said thisBTW I'm not that other anon, I'm not a /pol/tard and I don't like the CSA. I was just exposing how you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
>>18446165>they wanted a state that exclusively served the interests of whites? How is this different from every other society built on enslaving niggers that ended up collapsing and turning into a brown shithole? (except for the muzzies who castrated theirs lmao)
>>18446025>their sole successful revolt out of many thousands was against women and childrenThe massacre of women and children only happened after the victory of the revolution, in 1804The biggest force the haitian revolutionaries had to fight wasnt the haitian whites for themselves (which were easily killed in 1804) but the expeditionary force napoleon sent in 1802, in his betrayal of Louverture.>was itself supported by a brigade of European soldiersClaiming the small number of poles who joined the haitian revolution was the sole reason of their victory is retarded, the biggest factor for the haitian revolution victory is that the ex slaves were trained by the french colonial goverment after the abolition of slavery in 1790s to use them against the spaniard and british colonial forces, unlike most slave rebellions in which slaves didnt have any military training.
Why do southerners love socialism so much?
>>18445520The left scenario only came about because of the Great Migration, which wouldn't have existed without the South, which had fucking counties and states with a majority negro population like Haiti.
>>18445560The Union stupidly forgot to castrate all the freed slaves. Ah shucks.
>>18445520Why is Southerner brown kek ?
>>18445520>You were right brother, we should've continued importing and breeding niggers and spreading them all across the country as livestock until they outnumber us like they did in your states. I'm sorry I didn't listen.Kek. Shut the fuck up you retarded hick.
>>18446406"Forgot"? They would never do such a thing. Breeding their slaves was what let them perpetuate the practice after their import was banned, and even before then, it was cheaper to breed them than to import, not to mention they got to indoctrinate them from birth into their way of life. It's easier to tell a kid his entire life that he is your property, than to import some tribesman and beat it into him.
>>18446351Those niggers were spanked by a numerically inferior force of Whites using clubs and horses against guns.>inb4 they aren’t WhiteThey aren’t Germanic, but they are White to any nigger
>>18446170Well Mexico didn’t collapse. Neither did Cuba.Nor did the Guarantee countries.It’s almost like when you retain power/cull the blacks you get to have both slavery and a functional state.>erm Latam isn’t functionalCompared to Whites, no. Compared to Africans, might as well be Japan.
>>18446134>wanted an ethnostateWho wants you to believe that?They want a White supremacist state. And they had it. And it worked for literally centuries.>>18446170Did Maryland collapse?It enslaved niggers. Where is the collapse?Unless you mean giving blacks rights collapsed America, in which case I agree. But blacks having rights in free countries also collapses those countries.Sweden had slaves and they didn’t collapse until free negroes began showing up.Almost like it’s a black problem.You agree? It’s a racial problem with blacks not necessarily slavery?
>>18446122>racists would never enslave niggersBunkertroons, everyone.
>>18446386Roosevelt wasn’t a socialist.He was a Shabbos goy.>why southerners not anti semiticBecause they lost a war and had to eat blank slate retardation for eight decades.
>>18446459>>18446463What makes the south's way of doing slavery any different from haiti or latin america? Why would the outcome be any different? What is it about the csa that makes it special compared to every other state that tried to build their society on slavery?
>>18446405Trvthnvke.
>one half of America brings them here>the other half frees themwhen the ass shits, both cheeks are stained
>>18446530Do people really think that slavery would've kept going if the north didn't stop it? Everyone else in the world would eventually get rid of it but america would be the special exemption?
>>18446537Retarded hicks thought that, yes. They said that to each other right before downing another bottle of moonshine and collapsing onto the floor in a puddle of their own piss.
>>18446465a dedicated racist would never bring black people to sacred american soil, they'd rather turn it over to aryan homesteadersthe people setting up plantations were greedy liberals who wanted to make a quick fortune
>>18446526>what makes them differentThey were a majority Northern European state with a living aristocracy and a large industrial base (compared to Latam).Look all of this is just postponing the debate.You want us to accept blacks as equals.We never will because blacks aren’t our equals. Not in the North where I live nor in the South have blacks ever bridged the IQ gap or the behavioral gap.Not even abroad.Blacks aren’t like us and they never will be, they’ll always be African. We’ll always be American.We don’t want them here. We don’t need them here. We don’t owe any moral debt to them.They will be lucky if they can leave North America alive.>you won’t do shitAlready doing shit. Zoomer Normies are reposting gypsy crusader to their school PowerPoints.Sorry but the nigger worship will end.
>>18446544And you are a dedicated racist?Can I get a TND from you?I’ll agree with you if you post Total Nigger Death
>>18446556>They were a majority Northern European statelol barely>>18446527go ahead and explain why the csa would be the only nation on the planet that would somehow keep slavery alive despite it dying out everywhere else
>>18446560>barelyBarely?They at most 1/3 black and if we are being particular the CSA was entirely White because non-Whites were barred from citizenship.The CSA, even counting slaves, was Whiter than America today, where blacks still form a underclass btw.Anyway nice goalpost shift.Majority English countries don’t become Haiti or Brazil because Anglos aren’t Haitian or Brazilian.The man makes the country.Sorry you had to find out this way.
most of america is beautiful. stop falling for propoganda.
>>18446565>>18446527
>>18446560>keep slavery aliveWhat does this even mean? Slavery never died, not even in America. The provision on slavery had an addendum adding slave labor could be used by prisons.Slavery is alive in various North African and South East Asian countries.Slavery never died.Slavery in the Confederacy would have been slowly abolished like it was in northern states. It would have taken more time but still would have occurred.If you can not separate social forces and social behaviors from events then I can’t help you, you have african IQ and no amount of educating you can make you see what is beyond your cognitive ability.
>>18446565Ok but can you explain how the csa would resist the worldwide collapse of slavery? The brits pressure every other country to stop slavery, but leaves the csa alone because uh...they just feel like it?
>>18446572>actually slavery is still alive in lawless collapsed shitholesdamn you got me, all the csa needs to do to preserve slavery is to collapse into anarchy
>>18446537>>18446540If the south was allowed to make its own decisions regarding the black population we'd probably still have segregation and if they migrate to the north the north would be apprehensive about the crime they cause, since the south would be sitting there bleeting "told you so, told you so".Of course black people would screech, shit themselves and cry over it and play the victim, but as a whole America would be a much more pleasant place.
>>18446570What?We are going to subdivide the Confederacy now because you found out today it was a majority White country?>these two majority black states meanMean what?Anglos held South Africa, they’re still holding it to this day despite blacks being in power, they were an absolute minority for the entirely of the history of Southern Africa.The Confederacy isn’t even as bad as South Africa.The Confederacy isn’t even as bad as America today.Though I am glad you are finally admitting blacks are ticking time bomb.I think we should enslaved or kill them or return them. Anywhere but here.>but da confederacyWhat about it? they wanted to keep blacks enslaved.Our problem began with abolition. The South was fine for centuries.
>>18446578How would they avoid becoming like south africa? Would they find a way to become totally 100% economically self-sufficient?
>>18446579>actually only two states were majority blackLOLLLLL dixoids holy shit. yeah there were only two majority black states, imagine defending being a minority in your own state
>>18446574What the fuck does that even mean? “Resist the world wide collapse of slavery”What are you talking about?Virginia held a referendum on abolition in 1830, support for removing blacks only increased until the Nig Turner chimpout. The Confederacy would have abolished slavery eventually like Brazil did, and unlike Brazil, they wouldn’t be a 90% shitskin failed state because the Confederacy was majority White.>BritainWhat about Britain?>how would the confederacy surviveLike literally everyone else did.Your posts indicate you believe the confederacy was founded solely on the single issue of slavery and without slavery they’d magically dissolve into warlord states or something.Are you black? Only niggers could be this tone deaf to geopolitical development.>>18446577Yes, lawless collapsed shitholes like the United States where slavery is permitted by penal labor.Lawless collapsed shitholes the Oil states.Of course, no on vacations in the UAE or Qatar, ahhh yes Qatar which had a formalized legal institution of slavery until 1952.Ermmmm how did Qatar survive the British ending slavery?????
>>18446593>majority whiteother than the multiple states that were majority black
>>18446585Where’s your TND? You won’t post it because you’re a nigger lmao.>defending being a minorityWho? I say Whites should outbreed them. Slave majority states should have Whites having more kids.What’s the problem with that?You’re a nigger. That’s why you hate slavery and ostensibly the existence of blacks but you never say what should’ve been done about them.Surely you agree abolition was NOT the correct answer right? We can agree the existence of blacks is not ideal, but giving them any kind of rights is downright stupid. Surely you agree right?You’re going to the breaking barn if you can’t answer.
>>18446603>TOTAL NIGGER DEATH>anyway here's why living in a black majority state is actually fineHow can you be racist but claim to love a country in which blacks become the majority and everyone was fine with it?
>>18446597Nope. The CSA was majority White.>this town is majority White except for the household which is majority non-WhiteThat’s what you sound like.It was majority White with no exceptions. The CSA was a majority White country.Now return the goalposts before I kneel on you.
>>18446610Blacks were never a majority in the Confederacy.Pointless conversation.You shift the goalposts when you find out something doesn’t support your retarded strawman argumentYou engage in bad faithYou won’t even post TNDYou’re a dumb nigger. Your people are slaves because that is how they behave, like dishonest dogs.That is why your continent is the whore the world, taken by Levantines, Arabs, Berbers, Persians, Indians, Latins, and Whites.Dishonesty is not a substitute for accepting reality.You will always be the bottom rung.
>>18446611>>18446620>LALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU NU-UHHere is the official census from 1860 starting that multiple south carolina and mississippi are minority white.https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1860/population/1860a-32.pdfhttps://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1860/population/1860a-22.pdfAgain, why do you support states that replaced their white population with blacks, so much to the point where whites were a minority and blacks were the majority?
>>18446597>multiple states that were majority blackThe South had more negro counties than states before the Great Migration.
>>18446624the most superior race on earth decided to populate the new continent with evolutionary throwbacks that had stayed behind in subsaharran africa while the rest of humanity was evolving, they then decided they were equals, black people have not made a net contribution to the US since civil rightsthe greatest mistake and tragedy in history
>>18445520>How would you calmly counterargue against author of the picture?Southerners were the ones demanding that Blacks be transported all over the US.
