Why are there so few non-fat big breasted women present in western art? Even if depicting bustiness was frowned upon for whatever reason some artists must have not given a fuck about societal norms.
>>18446253Most of the women in these paintings are prostitutes. Think about their upbringing and nutrition. It’s very unlikely they would have had big tits without being big girls. I don’t see the problem though. I literally cannot imagine how wonderful it must have been to blow a load in her pussy while holding onto all that flesh.
>>18446253They weren't brain rotted and liked a woman with a feminine figure.
>>18446300How are small breasts feminine?
PEQUEÑO EL ELEGANTE BUSTO:DELEITE DE GUSTO DILECTO.OBESAS LAS GROTESCAS TETAS:GULLERÍA DE GUSTO INFECTO.
>>18446253Reminder that hyperskinny women with bolted on tits is a fashion norm started and perpetuated by gay male fashion designers in the mid 20th century in addition to experimental dieting pills like dinitrophenol and amphetamines
>>18446471Wouldn't the cocksucking homosexuals logically prefer women with no tits over women with fake tits?
>>18446476They do but they recognize straight guys need SOMETHING to keep them invested. In their little fashion paradise they employ 80 lb anorexic women with B cups at best
>>18446276>THOSE SEXY BIG BREASTED JIGGLY WOMEN WHO NEVER EVEN GLANCED AT ME ARE WHORES!Actual pathetic incel cope.Yeah the skinny weird chick says she likes anime like Death note n shit bro, I'm sure, that means she might like you. Probably
>>18446476EVIL HOMOSEXUALS STRIVE FOR WOMEN TO BE DEFORMED BY HAVING PLASTIC BLOBS IMPLANTED IN THEIR CHESTS, AND, ALSO FOR THEM TO HAVE NO BREASTS AT ALL, WHICH IS WHY THEY ALSO PROMOTE MAMMARY AMPUTATIONS.
>>18446489A ton of muses in art were prostitutes. I don't know what's going on in your life, but you need to take all that pent up anger and change it. Fucking loser.
>>18446522>hypogondal animal thinks caps lock is me screamingYou're trembling. You know the big breasted Eve would overpower you, so you are attracted to the infantile skinny girl.More pedophilic than epstein tbqh
>>18446528Wait, hahaha. You're a big girl, ain't you? That's cute. Show us your folds.
>>18446534I called you an incel sure, but you're a genuine retard if you think I'm a woman. It's just true weak men are attracted to smaller weaker females. Same applies to taller more robust women in the reverse. Both genders enjoy to feel they are fulfilling the role as Man or woman.It's why your ilk prefer the neotenuous prepubescent presenting Asiatic female
>>18446539So are you a tranny, what are you? I'm not into chicks with broad shoulders, Adam's apples, and of course penises, but some other guy, probably one far better than me, obviously, will. If you look at the first post I made I was very much aroused by the woman in the portrait and thought about how wonderful it would be to fuck her. Because, unlike what you think about me, I've had sex with bigger women and like the way their bodies feel against mine.
>>18446253Having porn featuring women like Milena Velba and Abbi Secraa readily available have permanently altered what Western men find attractive. Men of the past were (perhaps blissfully) unaware of how big and sexy breasts could get.
>>18446253sophisticated intellectuals have never been attracted to bimbos, and that's who made the art for thousands of years. they liked either plump fertility symbols or more slender bottom heavy women.so if you like skinny bitches with fat tits you're mentally a pleb with gutter tier opinions
>>18446445Speak English you dumb spic
>>18446445Kek
>>18446253>fatahem, the correct term is "rubenesque"
>>18446253this made me realize that modern pornography is worthless and historical western paintings are 100x more gooning material
>>18446924to me, she's beautiful
>>18446253Khazar milkers have always been a jewish scheme
>>18446253Art is the hobby of the government officials of the past, the nobility to flaunt their status
>>18446253s-source?
>>18447124No more weight remarks, Tony. They're hurtful, and they're destructive.
>>18446445You're a pedophile Kevin?
>>18448034Is being attracted to women with small breasts pedophilia?
>>18448034Yes
>>18448102its a jewish psyop
>>18448102>is being attracted to juvenile features pedophilic? Planning that trip to Cambodia, George?
>>18448034?NO.
>>18446445Somebody translate, please. I don't want to read a chatbot's literalist "translation".
>>18447657I like a woman you can grab onto something
>>18448317Nobody here knows Spanish, let alone understand poetry
>>18446539this post is giving high-iq feminist (female) vibes.>if you think i'm a womanobservant readers will note this is not an actual denial. you could be a woman arguing in bad faith. subtle execution.>you're an incelthis is an argument from holes (you aren't virile enough to acquire penetrative sex from women, voluntary or not, therefore you aren't worth listening to)
>>18446253A part of it is nutrition, but also the rarity of such women. Regarding the taste bit, yes, that is true without a doubt. Many male artists historically, and even today, tend to be weirdoes with very particular and even peculiar tastes, and only the democratization of art changed this. Your pic proves it, since it was drawn by1. a woman 2. in 1932>>18446471>the gays made me like fat tits, I s-swear!What a cuck lolI find it funny how OP's question has been ignored by those sanctimonious faggots virtue signaling about their superior aristocratic tastes (even though they're all plebs, but they're in denial about it) and how they are totally not in denial about their homosexuality, or another preference I would rather not disclose, but everyone knows what it is.
>>18446253Fat was the standard of beauty and it was hard to find non-fat women.
>>18447481zinaida serebriakova
