>each region is a single racial bloc >freedom of movement for members of that race within each bloc >strict racial homogeneity within each racial bloc except for the hispanic bloc, arab bloc, and southeast asian bloc which allows mixed race and limited multi-racial movement >true global diversity >end of racism >racial blocs can subdivide into as many polities as they wish, ending all ethnic grievances
chilean hands made this
>>18446479>Because everyone in the US is whiteYou are a moron, I will not elaborate further
>>18446517The implication is Back-to-Africa
>>18446517You're going back
>>18446479Mozambique
>>18446543>The implication is Back-to-AfricaThe implication is that you are idiot if you think that black people are the only minority in the US>>18446547Suck my cock Groyper
>>18446599The rest are all Hispanics. Hispanics go to Mexico. Blacks go to Liberia and Sierra Leone. Done.
Why is levant separated from mena and why do honkys get so much land?
>>18446479least out of touch /pol/tranny
>>18446479Because you're telling nonwhites to scram from most of the highest cultural and economic centers, to also give up a lot of land that is already theirs because whites ruled it at some point, and dividing them up into eight blocs to prevent them from uniting to revise this terrible deal
>>18446479Giving the whites SA, Namibia and Rhodesia is one thing but why the hell did you give them Mozambique?And what are these races? Why is Afghanistan a part of India and not Persia? Why is the Levant separate from the rest of MENA?>>18446600And the Amerindians?
>>18446479These blocs are shitty and mainly serve to basically cut up the world for blue. Like why the fuck do they get all of Southern Africa?
>>18446645>Giving the whites SA, Namibia and Rhodesia is one thing but why the hell did you give them Mozambique?It'a all based off of "we wuz rulers and whipped their ass as labour serfs.". Which using that logic you might as well .are SEA blue too.
Lol, lmao.
Fixed
There are like, ~10 different races indigenous to sub-saharan africa.
>>18446479>>18446857Leave the Sarts out of your steppe larp, They're Persianate peoples.
>>18446479Just die.
>>18446645America is only 1% Amerindian. There's more actual Indians than Amerindians. Literally irrelevant.
>>184468571. Why is America in the European federation? Youre 50% white2. Why is Central Asia in the European federation?3. Why is South America split? There really is no difference between the southern cone and the rest of Latin America>inb4 LE EUROPEAN MIGRATIONThe majority of European immigrants to that region were temporary agricultural workers who returned to their countries later on.I must admit though, the flags are kino. Especially the European federation’s
>>18446866Very few of them are big enough to maintain their own sovereign state relative to all the others, so you have to put them all in one state anyways. Massive pan-African state with ethnofederalism like Ethiopia makes the most sense
>>18446600African-Americans are basically bleached "ancient" Yorubalanders. They should go to Nigeria.
>>18446873Yeah, for the most part. They should only be allowed in Yorubaland or Igboland if they're actually willing to learn the languages tho, otherwise they go to Liberia or Sierra Leone.
>>18446872True, but they should at least seperate the Cushites from everyone else.
>>18446871>I must admit though, the flags are kino. Especially the European federation’sTy anon, I made that one. I wish the EU wasn't gay and retarded
>>18446875I honestly think the Somalis and Oromos are probably better off under Pan-African rule than as sovereign states. Same with Nilo-Saharans etc. Best to pool their efforts. Amharas and Tigrays should he independent tho.
>>18446876Youre welcome>I wish the EU wasn't gay and retardedCool, but you’re American why should you care
Honestly just give African Americans their Rhodesia with New Afrika in Mississippi and Alabama. Not like those lands are worth much in resources anyways. Give the Spics New Mexico and Arizona so they can stfu about the Aztlan revanchanism.You slavs need their own land. Your not gonna get Europe and them working together nor agreeing on anything.Either way nothing stopped Spics from forming the super nation in your pic except retarded superficial differences they imposed on themselves and thats why it wont work anywhere else either.
>>18446879Why? Last I checked, Somalia was one of the better countries in SSA. I could just be gobbling propaganda though.
>>18446479>Racial Blocs>That massive blue blob in South AfricaYou do know that area is 90% black, right? Just send all the saffers back to the Netherlands. Much easier. Also kick Chile out, they're a mestizo nation. You can keep Argentina, but I'll bet you you'd want them out sooner rather than later. And you should include Uruguay.
>>18446882> Mississippi and AlabamaWhy those two states in particular?
>>18446880I'm a fucking leaf actually. Our government's actually trying to join the EU right now because of global shenanigans.
>>18446883Somalia has been in a perpetual state of civil war since independence. Somaliland is a little bit better I think
I think ethno-nationalism is bad, actually
>>18446888Leafs are based. You are (or were, sorry) America but europeanised.
>>18446895We're being Indianized now unfortunately
>>18446893This is not ethno-nationalism. What OP is suggesting would likely devastate Africa due to racial and ethnic conflicts.
>>18446899(Ethno-nationalism is actually good)
>>18446479dividing the world into racial groups is something only a low-iq individual who you would want excluded from your racial group could come up with. A geographical grouping makes 100x more sense than grouping Russia with Argentina and Australia. Furthermore your groupings are even more arbitrary than a broad racial grouping... Most "mestizo" countries are actually majority European. You got the "argentina is white" meme but you fail to include Uruguay in the "white" country despite it being the whitest country in latin america. The Levant could just as easily be grouped with the rest of the MENA countries, but Lebanese and Israelis would not like to share a state with so many Muslims. Iran gets to be their own country for some reason??? In Africa you are bunching all different categories of Africans other than North African countries and "white" south Africa?(even in south africa white people make up a small portion of the population, it's even smaller in Mozambique, a country that speaks Portuguese.) South East asia presents a pretty obvious roadblock to "racial" grouping, as soon as you start looking at ethnicities it becomes difficult to justify grouping Burmese peoples with Malay and especially Papuans. India is already enough of a clusterfuck, grouping afghanistan in with them is beyond retarded. Finally I have to mention Haiti being included in the "mestizo" country makes no sense racially or linguistically. /pol/tards stay on /pol/.>>18446870and that's why Greenland was included in the white country???
>>18446905Greenland can't be independent. It has a couple tens of thousands of people.
>>18446887A lot of HBCUs and Black historical places.
>>18446857Why did whitey took all steppe except mongolia and 75% of turkey?
>>18446921
people can't even agree on what is white, black etc, and even if you somehow hammered in a concreate definition you then run into the problem of said racial groups are a massive umbrella term for various different groups with their own languages and beliefs which would inevitably cause any said federation to fail, especially when you have the inevitable crisis of people being forced to move to certain areas just because of their race
>>18446479>each region is a single racial bloc They're not>freedom of movement for members of that race within each bloc You have people within this bloc you made up, arguing about it and hating people that engage in it, right now, at this very instant. There are literally people in the state I live in that might shoot me or at least be violent towards me not for being a Kiwi but for moving to this state from first living in California. >strict racial homogeneity within each racial bloc except for the hispanic bloc, arab bloc, and southeast asian bloc which allows mixed race and limited multi-racial movement Race as it is culturally understood is not a thing and the more you try to define it the stupider it gets. >true global diversity We already have it>end of racism You literally made it entirely about race>racial blocs can subdivide into as many polities as they wish, ending all ethnic grievancesAnd then you made it pointless and stupider.
>>18446479The only way this could plausibly work. >allows europeans and east asians and maybe jews to move to any racial bloc >racial blocs are containment zones of the other races >within the blocs are potentially hundreds of nations
>>18446938>and maybe jewsNigga kys
>>18446479Because race doesn't exist as a scientific concept that means anything to anyone socially.That isn't to say that "black people" and "white people" and "yellow people" don't exist, it means that what we consider people pertaining to those groups look like is largely a cultural and socially understood nebulous definition that has a wide range of physical characteristics. And the more you try to define what is a race, and put up barriers, and lines, that deem one segment pure and another impure. The more you end up with tiny parts of a population in several countries being "pure" members of X race. Which begs the question that if all these members of the "same" race exist in wildly different nations already living peacefully and coexisting with other races and engaging in cycles of prosperity and ruin...of what possible use is the definition???Did England not prosper irrespective of racial homogeneity? Did China not do so as well?Did the United States not do so? What possible evidence can be provided that a mythic "racially homogeneous" empire can or necessarily must be more prosperous than a racially diverse one???
>>18446949You don't need the colonies to be racially pure, but the metropole needs to be or at least the good neighborhoods.
>>18446953Why?
>>18446956Because if the imperial metropole (the people who the empire is supposed to benefit) doesn't have a homogenous sense of ethnic identity, then what is the point of the Empire? England and America went to shit when the colonial subjects were allowed to move into the metropole.
>>18446960>homogenous sense of ethnic identity>ethnicI thought you were talking about race.
>>18446962They're both social constructs really and pretty synonymous, but they're both as real as class or legal personhood, etc.
>>18446960>when the colonial subjects were allowed to move into the metropoleWho exactly do you mean? The Welsh?
>>18446965There was never that many Welsh, but you could definitely make a case for the Irish moving into Liverpool and East London being the beginning of the end.
>>18446964Except one is inclusive without clinging to appearance and the other is rooted in it. I can be member of an ethnicity and that ethnicity can have no racial basis with a great amount of diversity of appearance noticeable or unnoticeable to individuals within the ethnic group and outside it. So you moved the goalpost.Why'd you do that?
>>18446972Every ethnicity has some racial component. Ethnicity is hereditary by definition. If it's hereditary, that means it's racial. It's a very loose concept, but it's important because everybody believes in it. Even race abolitionists acknowledge that White people and black people exist and that these categories are easily visible and important. Your perception of your own race/ethnicity and those of others impacts your behavior.
>>18446976>If it's hereditary, that means it's racial.If someone inherited my house are they part building now?
>>18446969>but you could definitely make a case for the Irish moving into Liverpool and East London being the beginning of the end.Ah yes, the 13th and 14th centuries, Truly the beginning of the end of the English empire. Indeed no greater heights can be climbed for them.
>>18446977If someone inherits your predisposition for liver cancer, then that's racial, for example. A lot of diseases have racial components. Basically anything that's biologically hereditary in humans that isn't common to absolutely everybody is racial.
>>18446872>Very few of them are big enough to maintain their own sovereign state relative to all the othersBased off what numbers? Is 7 million too small?
>>18446982No ethnic group forms even a plurality in Kenya or Tanzania for instance. You can't make these into nation-states and you can't break them into microstates or it would just be constant war and no economic development. You need a big multiethnic state with maximal ethnic/regional autonomy.
>>18446980You are messing up your definitions lol.
>>18446984>You can't make these into nation-states several were statea before they got conquered or forcefully absorbed into the colonial predecessors for those states.>You need a big multiethnic state with maximal ethnic/regional autonomy.This always ends up just handing power to a scant few and often times ends up empowering foreigners.
>>18446976The fact you insist on including a racial component when you haven't defined race to begin with should already trouble you. Since that is the entire point of the OP and indeed this thread and since you immediately shifted the goalpost to "ethnicity" in your 2nd response to try and sidestep that indefensible hill. An ethnicity can have a component of appearance rooted in it, it may even be a major part of it. But that alone does not define it and it has a trait that race intrinsically does not. It's mutable.
>>18446990>This always ends up just handing power to a scant fewDon't know how to break it to you but that's literally every country everywhere all the time.
>>18446991How can race not exist and be immutable?
>>18446982>Is 7 million too small?Yeah.Canada has near 30 million and there's plenty of people that think it's too small to exist.
>>18446898No.
>>18446949>>18446933>>18446930>>18446905>race is a social construct This place is gen x central. You old people lost the debate and we are all just waiting for you to die.
>>18446995That's actually different though.
>>18447002>You old people lost the debate and we are all just waiting for you to die.So you can agree with what they said about it being a racial construct?
>>18446976>It's a very loose concept, but it's important because everybody believes in itMany either don't belive it but have to play into shitty Western politics or have their own take on it that's equally as stupid.
>>18446998see>>18446949White people are white, you will not never be white if you were born white. White people exist as a race and the definitionally achieved existence of this group within the context of this conversation serves no purpose other than to identify that this group exists. It's like telling me some tea kettles are white. I can agree that there are in fact white tea kettles, but in so far as that helps me classify tea kettles in ways that improve my overall quality of life or help me reach my goals it's not very useful. Unless I'm trying to match appliances to my decor.
>>18447008If you "don't believe in race", but functionally act as if you do, then you just believe in it.
>>18447009What if you physically inhabit a White tea kettle which you cannot escape from? Then you would have a vested interest in White tea kettles as a collective.
>>18447020No then I would hate the white tea kettles with short spouts and square handles.
>>18447014>then you just believe in it.You don't though. You can still use the words and find the overall framework total bunk.
>>18447027Ethnicity/race exist as ideas. If you use the words, then you're acknowledging the existence of the ideas.
>>18447031>Ethnicity/race exist as ideasYes they do. Thank you for pointing out ideas exist and are things. And why does basing all civilization around either concept instantly solve everything? Or anything even?
>>18447035If everyone considers you to belong to a category and you are incapable of escaping that category then you should work with the other people in that category to maximize your collective interests thereby furthering your individual interests.
>>18447039Oh so you're a humanist, very progressive of you.
>>18447039>If everyone considers you to belong to a category>If everyone>everyoneA lot of assumptions there.
>>18447031>If you use the words, then you're acknowledging the existence of the ideas.Haha. Not even close. There's plenty of people who respect pronouns but atill think it's total bunk for various reasons. Same for many racial/ethnic categories.
>>18447039what if people within your group make up arbitrary categories so the category they arbitrarily designated as their own can be more easily controlled by them against the other arbitrary categories, thereby maximizing their interests against everyone else's interests? Wouldn't that be really weird? And they could even make sure their rule of their arbitrary category is never threatened by more competent individuals in other arbitrary categories because he made sure that people in other categories can't be art of his category. It's only natural you see.
>>18447047Well no, at its most basic level using the word does acknowledge the existence of the word. See, there it is ======> word right there ======> wordI'm looking right at it.
>>18447048And? That's literally what I'm proposing.
>>18447054So to be clear, you're proposing the creation of mutually exclusive arbitrary categories of people ruled by individuals exclusively of those categories regardless of their ability to manage anything relative to individuals of other categories?
>>18447057No, if I was in a position to choose categories, I'd create a totally peaceful world-state. Instead we have to work with the pre-existing categories that we have already been assigned. If they fade away one day, that would be nice, but I doubt racial categories will cease to exist until we discover aliens or something.
>>18447058>if I was in a position to choose categories, I'd create a totally peaceful world-stateOh my sweet summer child
>>18447049>at its most basic level using the word does acknowledge the existence of the wordThat'a like saying Santa Claus the myth exist because his name exists.
>>18447071The tradition of putting gifts under trees and attributing it to Santa Claus does exist
>>18447071clearly the myth does exist, you're citing the mythical figure within the myth when you say "Santa Claus"
>>18446984Africa should be largely composed of decentralized states imho.
Fixed better
>>18446479dis nigga thinks whypeople live in mozambique lmao
Why is the levant separate from mena? Why is turkey in honkey team?
