[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: TikTok.jpg (71 KB, 1280x720)
71 KB JPG
>English
>Bald
>Go from commie to lolbert by researching Hitler
>Go to Objectivist Cult meeting
>Be eaten by 32th degree randroids
Was he right? Was Hitler a socialist? Also What is the best AT weapon historically when considering pure AT role as in just sticking to tanks?
YES besides not going to the lolbert comicon instead,YES and the pak 43 because penis sausage waffen was unironically the best at tank busting since commies made decent heavy tanks and krauts had good optics to make use of good AT.
>>
File: 1614459383779.gif (60 KB, 516x241)
60 KB GIF
>>18446940
*TIK hits blunt*
>The Roman Empire was Socialist because they collected taxes and built roads
>>
>/his/ doesn't even seethe about actual historians >just youtubers that skim wikipedia articles
grim
>>
>>18447007
Are your historians bald?
>>
>>18446940
This guy still at it?

>>18447007
Wouldn't say I hate him but HOLY SHIT he's such a Thatcherite fundamentalist he comes off as a bad parody. Except he's
serious. Like he LITERALLY thinks a military logistics system would work better if instead of Box of Guns A goes to Battlefield B, we should decentralise supply and let every commanding officer should buy what they need from big cache of shit on MilitaryAmazon's Fulfillment Center.

I'm just glad he does stick to skimming wiki articles.
>>
>>18447032
>military amazon ran by bald englishmen
why not?
also doesn't he constantly cite glanz and the vampire economy?
>>
>>18447032
>we should decentralise supply and let every commanding officer should buy what they need
isnt this what the IRGC does?
>>
>>18447032
>a military logistics system would work better if instead of Box of Guns A goes to Battlefield B, we should decentralise supply and let every commanding officer should buy what they need from big cache of shit
He literally didn't say that.
-Days since socialists didn't use blatant lies of the most primitive and easiest to disprove kind to defend their failed ideology: 0
>>
>>18447041
Because. Would you rather:

A. Have more than enough ammunition and artillery an hour away for a firefight
B. Order online and then wait a day or more more for the ammunition to be delivered to your location when your unit is low on ammo. And then you run through your savings cause you aren't the richest NCO, and the asshole at MilitaryAmazon jacked up prices to make money, so you end up having to throw rocks.

And that's not even getting into all the corruption problems you'd cause with this kind of "efficient" system.
>>
>>18447051
>the asshole at MilitaryAmazon jacked up prices
is why you would
>Have more than enough ammunition
on another note
>Order online and then wait a day
this would likely be the main problem as military command structure either foregoes suprise and coordinates supply and establishes proper supply dumps, making probably the best army at attrition warfare or it goes smaller armies that are less logistically heavy and more independent of each other with it's load of benefits and downsides.
As opposed to a centrally planned army with possible coordinated surprise manoeuvres, shit logistics and corruption
>not even getting into all the Corruption problems you'd cause with this kind of "efficient" system.
It would be nice of you if you could.
>>
>>18447044
And Ukraine
>>
>>18447032
He calls racism socialist and pretends like tribalism is communism. I think his true ideology is globohomo.
>>
>>18447032
>>18447045
cont; in other words say: timestamp or GTFO
>>
>>18446940
>Was Hitler a socialist?
What is is about Hitler that doesn't make him a socialist? The examples always given is that he didn't do things according to Marxist theory and that he compromised, but that only holds up if you believe Marx invented socialism and that pragmatism cancels out any previously held beliefs.
>>
>>18447032
I mean he is a professional logistics guy. And he is right on that one point.
>>
>>18447459
Nobody can even define 'socialism'.
>>
>>18447493
Why of course, socialism is when the government does stuff
>>
>>18447459
Its hair spiltting from marxists
>>
File: tik logic.jpg (82 KB, 734x445)
82 KB JPG
>>
>>18447669
this.
>>18446940
He was right and his content was well researched. Too bad he fucked off



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.