[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1777071333025156.png (2.85 MB, 1398x1160)
2.85 MB PNG
Why were Germanics so easily able to fight off muslim invaders but meds always capitulated to them?
>>
While semites know of freezing temperatures on desert nights, they've never experienced such humidity and rain + winters.
It's why Arabs never took Anatolia either.
For Turks Anatolia was an upgrade.
Arabs stopped wherever climate got too different from Arabia.

Gives credence to Alexander, he's the only pre modern empire to conquer across wildly diverging climates.
>>
File: IMG_5138.jpg (133 KB, 1200x800)
133 KB JPG
>>18447001
Wrong
>>
File: Magyarország.jpg (297 KB, 724x496)
297 KB JPG
>>18446967
>Muslims always lost to steppeniggers
>Germans raped by steppeniggers for an entire century
>Magyar blood in every German man
>???
>>
>>18447143
Lechfeld
>>
Last I checked the Visigoths were btfo by the Arabs and pretty luch left history just after.
>>
>>18446967
I mean the Visigoths lost all of Spain to the Muslims, so they weren't THAT successful. They did eventually reconquer it, but it took almost a thousand years.
>>
>>18447271
>they

It was the Iberians who did it, not the Visidorks



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.