[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_4053.jpg (172 KB, 1920x1080)
172 KB JPG
How do other languages compared to themselves 400-500 years ago compare in the difference between English now and the same length of time? Or, do the 400-500-year old versions other languages have the same effect on the reader of those languages as the King James Version of the Bible would on the modern English reader?
Also, do you think there is enough patrimony of Lutheran liturgy to warrant their own Ordinariate?
>>
>>18447363
I don't know enough about non-European languages to comment, but it seems to have been a fairly consistent phenomenon across Europe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_French#Phonological_history
>>
>>18447387
Except Hungarian.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.