[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 62456464345.png (307 KB, 1080x1080)
307 KB PNG
Why is it so hard for capitalist stooges to admit that Stalin saved European civilization?
>>
>>18447721
>saved European civilization
>End of european civilization now imminent
Some saving he did.
>>
>>18447741
Europe is more peaceful and prosperous than any other time in history though?
>>
>>18447745
Also more brown and at lower birth rates.
Seriously though, that's the entire point about neonazis. European and probably western culture as it exists right now is doomed to fail, it's only a matter of time, and it's obvious to see for anyone willing to admit it (even for some who consider that a good thing). Hitler is seen as a point of diversion, where the west could have evolved into something radically different and, just possibly, sustainable. If the modern west was viable to continue existing, people wouldn't be looking to some failed radical ideology for guidance.

Mind you, that radically different thing would indeed be barely recognizable and probably not worth living in for the average modern european. So in a sense, stalin did save european culture as it exists in 1940+86 - for the short time that it will still continue to exist now.
>>
File: ep.png (251 KB, 672x422)
251 KB PNG
>>18447721
>>
>>18447721
Stalin allied himself with Hitler, that alliance only ended when Hitler (quite predictably) stabbed that retard in the back and caught the red army totally by surprise.
>>
>>18447773
Kek saved. Who's the guy on the right?
>>
Stalin is in hell
>>
>>18447764
>Hitler is seen as a point of diversion, where the west could have evolved into something radically different and, just possibly, sustainable.
I honestly doubt Germany winning would have changed anything, the course was set already waaaay before WW2, at best he might have prolonged the period of "normalcy" but I doubt since Germany would have liberalized and basically become like the US with their own Boomers(post-war kids growing up in prosperity and peace) and this is not even counting how Germans are very prone to liberal and socialist views, America was even more racist and conservative than Nazi Germany when it came to beliefs about race, family unit, etc. all up until the 60s and yet look at it now, it's a subversion of everything White Americans held dear for most of their existence
>>
>>18448202
Kaganovich
>>
>>18448218
>America was even more racist than Nazi Germany
No it wasn't lmao
>>
>>18448218
America wasn't literally "more racist than Nazi Germany." This is a pretty retarded take.
Even if you're defining racism solely on treatment of black people (not on Slavs or Jews or anything else?) the Nazis actively sterilized their black minority to remove them from existence. The most Americans did was make them drink out of a different water fountain
>>
>>18448218
Desegregation began almost as soon as WW2 ended retard. By the Korean war the US armed forces were racially mixed
>>
File: 1420053874461.jpg (20 KB, 306x306)
20 KB JPG
>>18448218
>America was even more racist than Nazi Germany
What level of contrarian revisionism are we on now
>>
>>18448218
African-American music was literally the US's main cultural export in the 1930s
>>
File: 1752847698291843.png (3 KB, 177x217)
3 KB PNG
go back to tranniechan. and stailin culled way more white people before the war even started
follow their example and shoot yourself trough the head because you have the means to post here bourgeois swine
>>
>>18448630
desu honest interracial marriage was banned in some states as late as the late 60's. my mother was alive
>>
>>18447721
The soviets were a little anti-white in that they didn't respect racial identity at all. This was for ideological reasons under lenin, and for power/economic reasons under stalin and beyond. They certainly weren't hoping that whites would eventually disappear or anything, despite what /pol/ would have you believe.
>>
>>18448656
as bad as that was it is not anywhere near the equivalent of nazi germany creating murder factories to kill millions of people for being born into ethnic groups they didn't like
>>
>>18447741
>Stalin saves european civilisation
>Stalin then dies and his nation is undermined, eventually collapsing.
>70 years later Europe has a problem
Doesn't sound like Stalin's fault, personally I'd blame the anti-communists.
You people are beyond retarded, imagine for instance someone saying Bismarck destroyed Germany because 40 years later Hitler lost ww2 and destroyed Germany lmao



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.