[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why is Polish art so bad compared to Russians and Ukrainians? I’m not trolling, this is demonstrable. I’m mostly talking about their traditional art. There is no Polish equivalent of Russian vyaz calligraphy, or iconography, or faberge eggs, or matroyshka dolls, or khokhloma, etc. Even art that originated in Poland, like pisanki eggs, are overshadowed by Ukrainians who elevated the craft beyond what polacks were doing.
>inb4 Beksiński
I am referring to historical traditional arts
>>
>>18447820
>Russian vyaz calligraphy, or iconography, or faberge eggs, or matroyshka dolls, or khokhloma, etc.
Disgusting shit.
>I’m mostly talking about their traditional art
Poland was influenced of Renissance, Russia wasn't. That's all what you need to know.
>>
>>18447833
Russian art is gorgeous. Poles seem legitimately inbred and ugly and stupid and evil.
>>
>>18447833
>Poland was influenced of Renissance, Russia wasn't
They were actually you stupid pshek, Russian iconography became very Westernized in the 17th century directly because of Peter’s exposure to Renaissance art of the west. He forced the church to paint images in western style. You are blatantly wrong, apologize now.
>>
>>18447820
Because Poland didn't actually exist for most of history and everything associated with it is part of something else. As in your own post associating art with only Ukraine that was developed in both.
A lot of your examples are considered weird silly exaggerated art. Vyaz, icons, matroshka dolls to make politicians look stupid. Poland has decorative cookware and most of your examples are just not done because they're bad or they're not given a name.
It's very hard to distinguish cultures from each other and most are basically the same and only the names and places change.
>>
>>18447843
>They were
They weren't
>you stupid pshek
Are you american?
>in the 17th century
It's classicism, not renaissance.
>directly because of Peter’s exposure to Renaissance art of the west
Peter the Great? He wasn't a Tsar before 1689.
>>
>>18447859
preposterous hairsplitting and trying to weasel out of uncomfortable truths like a jew. its not even worth dignifying. this is why you are a historical laughingstock.
>>
File: orthodox ''art''.jpg (3.96 MB, 2276x2798)
3.96 MB JPG
>>18447841
>>18447820
Traditional Russian art is pure dog shit. Gaudy, never strayed from the religious theme, and just bad on a purely technical level (perspective, depth)
Russian art only became good when they started Westernizing and copying the West under Peter the Great.
>>
>>18447934
post the amazing polack iconography then. you got the nigger madonna, that ugly licheń madonna, and uhhhh…hmm…nothing else at all. post the mindblowing polish devotional art like…uh…the divine mercy image?
>>
>>18447999
I'm not simping for Polish art, I don't know or care for it, I just know Orthodog art fucking sucks.
>>
>>18448001
Theres nothing to simp for



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.