[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


I don't think any white is saying "crime didn't exist back then" they are acknowledging bad things happened, crimes happened, but are merely saying that it's safer back then than now. They are saying there's much less chance of you being pushed in front of a moving train by a black schizophrenic, stabbed to death on a bus, much less chance of being randomly stabbed while walking through a city at night, much less chance of women being raped, children beaten to a pulp by black thugs in schools, etc. How can anyone say they are wrong? Simply owning a pair of working eyes shows you they are right.
>>
>>18451381
Sure as long as you ignore all the Lynching, Beating and raping wives, Beating and raping slaves, Murdering queer people, Casual and institutionalized racism, sexism and homophobia, and much more.
>>
>>18451381
>>18451405
>things were more peaceful back when we were literally trying to uplift the Negro into a conquering race by spraying them with the Roman's favourite sweetener

Peak delusion.
>>
>>18451405
why it is wrong again?
>>
>>18451422
Because Elohim said so
>>
>>18451430
>Exodus 21:20-21
> 20 “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result,
>21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.
>>
>>18451381
whiny crybaby chud
>>
File: images (3).jpg (7 KB, 213x236)
7 KB JPG
>>18451442
"Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses, saying: "He married a Cushite woman!"

As the cloud withdrew, Miriam was stricken with snow-white scales.[46] Moses cried out to God, "O God, pray heal her!"[47] But God said to Moses, "If her father spat in her face, would she not bear her shame for seven days? Let her be shut out of camp for seven days."

Ummmm Christxisters...what's our response?
>>
File: img-2026-04-28-10-02-18.png (1.74 MB, 2240x2800)
1.74 MB PNG
>>18451381
>that it's safer back then than now.

It's not
>>
>"vgh the past was better and safer"-bros when they're transported to 1970s south bronx
>>
>>18451405
>Beating and raping slaves,
In the 1950’s? Dumb retard baby.
>>
>>18451492
>1979
did you even read your own chart, get one that goes back to the 1950s
>>
>>18451381
>there's much less chance of you being pushed in front of a moving train by a black schizophrenic, stabbed to death on a bus, much less chance of being randomly stabbed while walking through a city at night
That's very unlikely to begin with. Your chances of being a victim of random murders or rapes in the US are very very low.
>>
>>18451405
how is any of that my problem

>Lynching
>Murdering queer people
they had it coming

>Beating and raping wives
no different from some meth addict domestic disturbance call, except in the 1950s it wouldn't affect me

>slaves
1950s not 1850s, not that there was anything wrong with the antebellum south, I'd gladly invest in a cotton plantation as I am sure you invest in companies linked to third world sweatshops, brown people exist to serve the master race as they surge ahead technologically, same then as now

>Casual and institutionalized racism, sexism and homophobia
these terms have lost all meaning, not serving you a sandwich is not "oppression", black people can become NBA superstars and rap stars just fine without it, the same with women and homosexuals with whatever it is they do
>>
>>18451405
>50s
>slaves
>>
>>18451405
Not to forget white house bombings, communist revolts etc.
>>
>>18451381
This isn’t even true because crime exploded in the 60’s, it’s statistically safer now
>>
>>18451405
>/pol/tranny thread fell apart at the seams with this one post
>>
>>18451381
>dumb ass doesn't know what unreported/underreported means
Violent crime was at an all time low in the 2010s.
>b-but some niggers in Chicago shot up a liquor store and the news said....
I don't give a shit. The prior decade was the safest in American history up until the final year. This is backed by various sets of data from different sources so I don't wanna hear your tranny whining about bias either.
>>
>>18451381
>They are saying there's much less chance of you being pushed in front of a moving train by a black schizophrenic, stabbed to death on a bus, much less chance of being randomly stabbed while walking through a city at night
Why are you bringing up cities when whenever the '50s are romanticized, it's always the suburbs that are referred to?
>>
>>18451381
NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FOR ANY WHITE PERSON LIVING IN AMERICA.
>>
>>18451584
So the 50's and 60's were safer then the 70's, 80's, 90's, and 00's, but since 2010 we've matched and gone below the 50's/60's crime rate
>>
File: file.png (316 KB, 633x490)
316 KB PNG
Why weren't there any school shootings in the 1950s?
>>
>>18451845
There were a lot of school shootings in the 1950s (30 of them to be exact) but none of them resulted in a high kill count, usually only 1 or 2
>>
>>18451848
For a sense of perspective, how many school shootings happened during the 1990s?
>>
>>18451680
>their crime was underreported
>but not today's
It's mind boggling that someone can say this when the officially safest and lowest crime period ever in all of human history happens to coincide with psychotic drug addicts making public transit borderline unusable.
>>
File: 1776943072578944.jpg (5 KB, 130x184)
5 KB JPG
>>18451864
NTA but if anything crime statistics are more accurate today, also victimization rates agree with the data. You lose 50stranny
>>
>>18451864
>statistics are less accurate today than in the 50s
You impressed me with the most retarded post I've read on this board.
>>
>>18451869
>You lose
Popular, bipartisan consensus agrees with me. And this will not change so long as observable reality contradicts official reporting. In fact, doubling down and insulting people for recognizing changes that happened within living memory is the primary reason trust in the veracity of crime reporting evaporated overnight. Telling people not to trust their lying eyes does not work. Unless your goal is to have zero credibility.
>>
>>18451886
>year number bigger
>everything better
>>
>>18451841
We actually went back to nearly 80s crime rates post-covid. I also wouldn't trust this graph going back past 1930 given the lower population. I'm sure it would fluctuate more if they actually adjust for the world pop at the time. Obviously there would be less frequency in crime in a small town of 400 than ~3000.
>>
>>18451895
In case you're not being obtuse...it is indeed retarded to believe data is less accurate during an age of constant data mining and recording than it was back when they used punch cards for everything.
>>
>>18451901
No. What's retarded is thinking technology is the only factor in the accuracy of data. Especially when comparing two eras where virtually all inaccuracies were/are from human error and/or deceit rather than any technological failure.
If a crime went unreported in the 50s, it was because someone chose not to report it, which can and does happen today.
>>
>>18451405
>>18451450
>>18451678

ywnbaw
>>
>>18451897
>We actually went back to nearly 80s crime rates post-covid
Not '80s levels and it's already bounced back.
>I also wouldn't trust this graph going back past 1930 given the lower population
These are rates, not absolute numbers.
>>
>>18451869
personal experience takes precedent here actually. If public transit is felt to be less safe, then its equivalent to it actually being less safe in its economic and social effect.
50sBVLLs have won, decisively.

suffrage was a mistake
>>
>>18452213
>feelings don't care about facts chud just believe every rape accusation OK???
>>
>>18451405
>Lynching
Annual Black-on-White murders exceed the number of total lynchings of Blacks.
>Beating and raping slaves
>in the 1950s
Most historically literate Redditor.
>Murdering queer people
Good. Homosexuality is a mental illness.
>Casual and institutionalized racism
Good. Racism is just pattern recognition on a tribal level, and the past decades have shown that a society demonizing it leads to higher crime rates, unsustainable welfare, and a masochistic guilt cult.
>sexism
You mean the acknowledgement of the fact that women are naturally more adapted to motherhood whereas men are suited for combat and hard labour? Even leftists acknowledge that "sexism" (quotation marks because it's a bullshit term made up by Marxists) is justified by acknowledging that men are more violent and limiting conscription to them (like in Germany).
>homophobia
Good, as explained previously.
>>
>>18451678
>>
>>18451547
The 70s were already pozzed so this really isn't an own.
>>
>>18452072
/pol/tranny meltdown



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.