>>18451872buck breaking proves that slaves are not natural, they need to be buck broken first
Some, but even one freeman being subject to slavery isn't worth it.
MOST HUMANS ARE NOT PERSONS; MOST HUMANS ARE PEOPLE, BUT THAT DOES NOT ENTAIL THAT SLAVERY IS A NATURAL STATE OF BEING, NOR THAT ENSLAVEMENT IS A JUSTIFIABLE PRACTICE.
>>18451872Depends on what you mean by natural. Slavery predates agriculture though its growth goes hand in hand with the growth of agriculture, with the abundance of food and work making slavery more beneficial to have.
>>18451872Yes. Most people to this day are wage slaves. This only began once the parasitic model of agrarian feudalism was inefficient Now, what do you think will happen when AGI and advanced robotics makes them obsolete? The dignity of man is a superfluous thing. We exist for God, not the other way around.
>>18452170What about our dignity as base man, as God created us? Is it an affront to God to change the level of dignity divinely attributed to man. You aren't a god and neither are you a burden animal. Even if one is a slave, one shouldn't mistreat man both upwards and downwards
>>18452648all this to say that oppressing slaves would be akin making one a tranny
>>18451872Yeah. There are more slaves alive today, all we did as society was hide them from plain sight so we could feel morally better about ourselves. Mission accomplished.
>>18452170You exist for a fairy tale? Like you'd give your life for a fairy tale from iron age Judea?
>>18451872there are slaves now
>>18451872Yes, go outside and talk to some of these utter normalfags to learn what a slave by nature is. Political participation is not only wasted on them, but a tool of demagogy and tyranny for faceless institutions. Doesnt mean you get to chain them up or rape them or other fucked up shit like that.
i mean, are houses natural? are wagons natural? its a stupid question
>>18451872You're a slave of your own mind and senses, and you consider this natural, but it is not.
no, slaves are supernaturallike werewolves
